Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "monstad".
Did you mean:
consta
2007 May 24
1
all users prompted for username and passwd
Hi there,
I've recently configured a new server on our network...still having some
(newbie) samba issues:
Whenever anyone tries to access the new share they get prompted for a
username and password (these would smb users and passwords and not the
windows AD details, right?). I want the share to be accessed by anyone
with the correct group permissions without this prompt...
I did
2007 May 22
2
kerberos_kinit_password -- Preauthentication falied ??
Hi,
I'm fairly new to samba so apologies if this is an old problem....
When I try 'net ads join -U administrator' I get the following:
[2007/05/22 12:15:15, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_add_machine_acct(1368)
ads_add_machine_acct: Host account for storage4 already exists -
modifying old account
Using short domain name -- ABSOLUTESTUDIOS
[2007/05/22 12:15:15, 0]
2006 Sep 22
0
Manually authenticate single user?
...o accounts in active directory are identical - apart from the
two new groups. I cannot see where one user account trips up whereas the
other is OK.
Can anyone suggest what might be the culprit here? While the "wbinfo -a"
route works, Id rather know more!
Thanks you for any help,
Kris Monstad
2007 May 24
1
User/group enumeration range not being used
Hi all,
Samba newbie again...I thought I was sorted out yesterday but a few more
thing are plaguing me....
I have in my smb.conf:
idmap uid = 10000-20000
idmap gid = 10000-20000
and
winbind enum users = yes
winbind enum groups = yes
however, 'getent passwd' shows users within the default enumeration
range (ie:16777550 or something like that!).This goes for groups too. I
can't
2007 May 18
0
Samba shares OK- but only after 'getent passwd' ?
Hi there,
I have just configured Samba on a new server and Im having a bit of
trouble with it - after it boots, it dosn't want to share until I've
issued the 'getent passwd' command...? Otherwise, it appears to be
running fine; 'wbinfo -g' and -u are showing the correct info (that is,
the same as 'getent...' )
Anyone have any idea why this could be?
Thanks,