search for: monstad

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "monstad".

Did you mean: consta
2007 May 24
1
all users prompted for username and passwd
Hi there, I've recently configured a new server on our network...still having some (newbie) samba issues: Whenever anyone tries to access the new share they get prompted for a username and password (these would smb users and passwords and not the windows AD details, right?). I want the share to be accessed by anyone with the correct group permissions without this prompt... I did
2007 May 22
2
kerberos_kinit_password -- Preauthentication falied ??
Hi, I'm fairly new to samba so apologies if this is an old problem.... When I try 'net ads join -U administrator' I get the following: [2007/05/22 12:15:15, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_add_machine_acct(1368) ads_add_machine_acct: Host account for storage4 already exists - modifying old account Using short domain name -- ABSOLUTESTUDIOS [2007/05/22 12:15:15, 0]
2006 Sep 22
0
Manually authenticate single user?
...o accounts in active directory are identical - apart from the two new groups. I cannot see where one user account trips up whereas the other is OK. Can anyone suggest what might be the culprit here? While the "wbinfo -a" route works, Id rather know more! Thanks you for any help, Kris Monstad
2007 May 24
1
User/group enumeration range not being used
Hi all, Samba newbie again...I thought I was sorted out yesterday but a few more thing are plaguing me.... I have in my smb.conf: idmap uid = 10000-20000 idmap gid = 10000-20000 and winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes however, 'getent passwd' shows users within the default enumeration range (ie:16777550 or something like that!).This goes for groups too. I can't
2007 May 18
0
Samba shares OK- but only after 'getent passwd' ?
Hi there, I have just configured Samba on a new server and Im having a bit of trouble with it - after it boots, it dosn't want to share until I've issued the 'getent passwd' command...? Otherwise, it appears to be running fine; 'wbinfo -g' and -u are showing the correct info (that is, the same as 'getent...' ) Anyone have any idea why this could be? Thanks,