search for: monsignor

Hello. We have a file server running Samba version 3.5.4-0.70.el5 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.6 that is bound to our AD domain and uses AD for authentication and file ownership. Additionally, we have a few other Linux VMs of similar vintage (RedHat 5.x) that are bound to AD using Winbind (Samba v 3.0, 3.3, 3.5). Our present AD environment is running at 2003 functional level.

...-file- server-as-member.html for how I set it up. On 19 September 2017 at 00:31, Jamie McParland via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > “Of course we must fear evil men, but there is another evil that we must > fear more… and that is the indifference of good men.” -- Monsignor > >> We’ve just recently moved over to Samba 4. It looks as if “force directory >> security mode” doesn’t work in samba 4. So I’m trying to setup the Windows >> ACLs on our groups share. >> >> I’ve been working on this for a few days. I’ve read over the docs, it &gt...

...> > > On 19 September 2017 at 00:31, Jamie McParland via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > “Of course we must fear evil men, but there is another evil that we > > must fear more… and that is the indifference of good men.” -- > > Monsignor > > > >> We’ve just recently moved over to Samba 4. It looks as if “force > >> directory security mode” doesn’t work in samba 4. So I’m trying to > >> setup the Windows ACLs on our groups share. > >> > >> I’ve been working on this for a few days....

Hello Rowland, I do not have support contract with RedHat, and due to some application dependency i have to be on 5.8. No choice for me to upgrade the OS. I have choice to upgrade Samba from 3.5 to 3.6.6 through RPMs, but i am not really sure whether it solves my core issue. Coming back to my original query " CIFS Null Session vulnerability ", just i would like to understand whether

...ptember 2017 at 00:31, Jamie McParland via samba < > > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > “Of course we must fear evil men, but there is another evil that we > > > must fear more… and that is the indifference of good men.” -- > > > Monsignor > > > > > >> We’ve just recently moved over to Samba 4. It looks as if “force > > >> directory security mode” doesn’t work in samba 4. So I’m trying to > > >> setup the Windows ACLs on our groups share. > > >> > > >> I’ve been wor...

...cParland via samba < > > > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > “Of course we must fear evil men, but there is another evil that we > > > > must fear more… and that is the indifference of good men.” -- > > > > Monsignor > > > > > > > >> We’ve just recently moved over to Samba 4. It looks as if “force > > > >> directory security mode” doesn’t work in samba 4. So I’m trying to > > > >> setup the Windows ACLs on our groups share. > > > >> > &g...