search for: monolitically

On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:49:46PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I have no problem with that. For example, can we teach > > the DMA API on intel x86 to use PT for virtio by default? > > That would allow merging Andy's patches with > > full compatibility with old guests and hosts. > > Well,

On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:49:46PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I have no problem with that. For example, can we teach > > the DMA API on intel x86 to use PT for virtio by default? > > That would allow merging Andy's patches with > > full compatibility with old guests and hosts. > > Well,

...e arch-specific code for i386 and x86-64; other architectures are going to need some minor cleanup in setup.c or the equvalent. The current git tree includes a number of utilities, like dash (sh), which aren't used by the default kinit configuration. Additionally, right now kinit is built monolitically, in other words there isn't a CONFIG_ option to turn off nfsmount, for example. Again, I'm more than willing to put the tree in any particular state that makes sense. 3. Path: it probably would make sense to push this into -mm first? It's taken this long, I'd like to make thi...

On Nov 10, 2015 7:02 AM, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:49:46PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I have no problem with that. For example, can we teach > > > the DMA API on intel x86 to use PT for virtio by default? > > >

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:54:21AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Nov 10, 2015 7:02 AM, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:49:46PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > I have no problem with that. For example, can we teach

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:54:21AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Nov 10, 2015 7:02 AM, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:49:46PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > I have no problem with that. For example, can we teach

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:35:27PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 13:35 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > E.g. on intel x86, there's an option iommu=pt which does the 1:1 > > thing for devices when used by kernel, but enables > > the iommu if used by userspace/VMs. > > That's none of your business. > > You call the DMA API when

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:35:27PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 13:35 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > E.g. on intel x86, there's an option iommu=pt which does the 1:1 > > thing for devices when used by kernel, but enables > > the iommu if used by userspace/VMs. > > That's none of your business. > > You call the DMA API when

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:09:47PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:40 +0900, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > Am 28.10.2015 um 16:17 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin: > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:38:57PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > This switches virtio to use the DMA API unconditionally. I'm sure > > > > it breaks

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:09:47PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:40 +0900, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > Am 28.10.2015 um 16:17 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin: > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:38:57PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > This switches virtio to use the DMA API unconditionally. I'm sure > > > > it breaks

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:54:21AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Nov 10, 2015 7:02 AM, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:49:46PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: >> > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:37:47PM

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:18:56PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 11:01 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Example: you have a mix of assigned devices and virtio devices. You > > don't trust your assigned device vendor not to corrupt your memory so > > you want to limit the damage your assigned device can do to your > > guest, >

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:18:56PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 11:01 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Example: you have a mix of assigned devices and virtio devices. You > > don't trust your assigned device vendor not to corrupt your memory so > > you want to limit the damage your assigned device can do to your > > guest, >

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 21 July 2016 at 02:06, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > >> Checking out all of it is bad, > > > > Define bad? > > Time? > > Disk space? > > Bandwidth? > > > > I mean, we already assume you have a lot of each anyway? > > This