search for: monetari

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 146 matches for "monetari".

Did you mean: monetary
2016 Jan 20
4
[3.8 Release] RC1 has been tagged
On 20 Jan 2016, at 18:23, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: >> Unfortunately I'm having lots of trouble with rc1 at this point: >> * libcxxabi can't build, because it requires unwind.h, which we do not yet have on FreeBSD 10.x (Ed Maste is working on it for 11.x, but
2016 Jan 20
2
[3.8 Release] RC1 has been tagged
Unfortunately I'm having lots of trouble with rc1 at this point: * libcxxabi can't build, because it requires unwind.h, which we do not yet have on FreeBSD 10.x (Ed Maste is working on it for 11.x, but that is not ready for general consumption). * The test-release.sh script has no option to disable only libcxxabi, you can only disable libcxx, libcxxabi and libunwind together (maybe this
2010 Mar 08
2
Monetary support to the R-project (Was: Re: Executable for Production Use)
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Barry Rowlingson <b.rowlingson at lancaster.ac.uk> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Ma Ismail - NewYork-MEAG-NY > <ima at meag-ny.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> A few of the developers on our Quant team are using R for data calculation and to generate a [snip] > ?I've noticed a lot of financial corporates getting into R
2010 Apr 01
1
Make a donation via PayPal? (was: [R] Monetary support to the R-project)
Dear R developers I understand that this is not a proper r-devel message, but it still touches to the organisation of the R project. I would like to make a small donation to the project, but I am not comfortable with sending my credit card details via post or mail and, as echoed elsewhere on r-help, would prefer to go through a generally accepted service such as PayPal. Would there be any
2017 Oct 13
2
How to define proper breaks in RFM analysis
> On Oct 13, 2017, at 2:51 AM, PIKAL Petr <petr.pikal at precheza.cz> wrote: > > Hi > > You expect us to solve your problem but you ignore advice already recieved. > > Your data are unreadable, use dput(yourdata) instead. see ?dput > >> test<-read.table("clipboard", heade=T) > Error in scan(file = file, what = what, sep = sep, quote = quote,
2019 Aug 14
9
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 is here
Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc2 was tagged yesterday from the release_90 branch at r368683. In the Git monorepo it's available as the llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2 tag. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc2 Binaries will be added as they become available. The tag went in roughly one week behind schedule (see "Upcoming Releases" at https://llvm.org), but
2017 Oct 13
0
How to define proper breaks in RFM analysis
Hemant's problem is that the indicators are not distributed uniformly. With a uniform distribution, categorization gives a reasonably optimal separation of cases. One approach would be to drop categorization and calculate the overall score as the mean of the standardized indicator scores. Whether this is an option I do not know. I did offer an "eyeball" set of breaks in a previous
2019 Jul 29
10
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 is here
Hi everyone, 9.0.0-rc1 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r367217 (tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1 in the Git monorepo). Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc1 Binaries will be added as they become available. Please file bug reports for any issues you find as blockers of https://llvm.org/PR42474 Release testers: please start your engines, run the
2017 Oct 06
3
Help RFM analysis in R (i want a code where i can define my own breaks instead of system defined breaks used in auto_RFM package)
I'm trying to perform an RFM analysis on the attached dataset, I'm able to get the results using the auto_rfm function but i want to define my own breaks for RFM. as follow r <-c(30,60,90) f <-c(2,5,8) m <-c(10,20,30) but when i tried to define my own breaks i got the identical result for RFM i.e 111 for every ID. please help me with this with working R script so that i can get
2019 Sep 13
4
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 5 is here
Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc5 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371837. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc5 Binaries will be added as they become available. There is only a single change from rc4 to rc5. Once more, the hope is that this will be the last release candidate and that we can
2019 Dec 14
5
LLVM 9.0.1-rc3 has been tagged
Hi, I've just tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc3. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. This will be the last release candidate unless there is a major problem. I'm planning to tag the final release on Dec 19. -Tom
2017 Oct 23
1
How to define proper breaks in RFM analysis
hello, I'm confused what you guys are talking about. i just want to set ideal threshold values for my RFM scores which can be done using Quantiles but i don't want to use quantiles because my data is not normally distributed so it will lead to wrong ranges of breaks. to fix this problem I'm looking for an approach which can define the ideal range to breaks to categorize RFM scores into
2017 Oct 05
0
RFM Analysis Help
Hi Hemant, As I suspected, the code broke when I got to the line: result <- rfm_auto(df, id="user_id", payment ="subtotal_amount", date="created_at") Error in rfm_auto(df, id = "user_id", payment = "subtotal_amount", date = "cr eated_at") : could not find function "rfm_auto" It looks like you are using the hoxo-m/easyRFM
2019 Sep 10
15
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 4 is here
Hello again, 9.0.0-rc4 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r371490. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc4 Binaries will be added as they become available. There are not a lot of changes from rc3 to rc4, and there are again no open release blockers, so I'm hoping this will be the last
2019 Nov 23
5
LLVM 9.0.1-rc1 Release has been tagged
Hi, I've tagged the LLVM 9.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload binaries. I've also updated the test-release.sh script to pull from GitHub instead of SVN, if you run into any issues with the new script, let me know. -Tom
2019 Dec 20
7
LLVM 9.0.1-final has been tagged
Hi, I've just tagged the 9.0.1-final release. Testers can begin uploading binaries. -Tom
2019 Aug 30
9
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 is here
Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc3 was tagged today from the release_90 branch at r370450. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc3 Binaries will be added as they become available. There are currently no open release blockers, which means if nothing new comes up, the final release could ship soon and this is
2019 Dec 07
6
LLVM 9.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
Hi, I've tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc2. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. If all goes well, this will be the last -rc. -Tom
2006 Jun 28
3
how do I validate currency format if I am storing in cents?
Hi all - To avoid floating point issues, I''ve decided to store monetary values in cents in the database. However, the user will enter these in dollars and cents. Two questions: 1) How do I do the validation for the currency format? It looks like ActiveRecord truncates the cents since it thinks the field type is a Fixnum. Am I forced to do validation in the controller? 2) Where
2019 Sep 17
18
[9.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 6 is here
Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc6 was just tagged from the release_90 branch at r372100. In the Git monorepo, it's tagged as llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc6 This is the same as rc5 plus one very minor change (r371969) that still seemed good to pick up. I'm not allocating extra time for testing this one, expecting to tag