search for: momit

..."static" "-mthread-model" "posix" "-fmath-errno" "-masm-verbose" "-mconstructor-aliases" "-nostdsysteminc" "-dwarf-column-info" "-debugger-tuning=gdb" "-target-linker-version" "305" "-momit-leaf-frame-pointer" "-coverage-notes-file" "/Users/joan/Documents-Local/Relay/RelayNou/main.gcno" "-resource-dir" "/Users/joan/LLVM-9/llvm-project/build/Debug/lib/clang/9.0.1" "-internal-isystem" "/Users/joan/LLVM-9/llvm-project/build/Debu...

..."static" "-mthread-model" "posix" "-fmath-errno" "-masm-verbose" "-mconstructor-aliases" "-nostdsysteminc" "-dwarf-column-info" "-debugger-tuning=gdb" "-target-linker-version" "305" "-momit-leaf-frame-pointer" "-coverage-notes-file" "/Users/joan/Documents-Local/Relay/RelayNou/main.gcno" "-resource-dir" "/Users/joan/LLVM-9/llvm-project/build/Debug/lib/clang/9.0.1" "-internal-isystem" "/Users/joan/LLVM-9/llvm-project/build/Debu...

..."static" "-mthread-model" "posix" "-fmath-errno" "-masm-verbose" "-mconstructor-aliases" "-nostdsysteminc" "-dwarf-column-info" "-debugger-tuning=gdb" "-target-linker-version" "305" "-momit-leaf-frame-pointer" "-coverage-notes-file" "/Users/joan/Documents-Local/Relay/RelayNou/main.gcno" "-resource-dir" "/Users/joan/LLVM-9/llvm-project/build/Debug/lib/clang/9.0.1" "-internal-isystem" "/Users/joan/LLVM-9/llvm-project/build/Debu...

..."static" "-mthread-model" "posix" "-fmath-errno" "-masm-verbose" "-mconstructor-aliases" "-nostdsysteminc" "-dwarf-column-info" "-debugger-tuning=gdb" "-target-linker-version" "305" "-momit-leaf-frame-pointer" "-coverage-notes-file" "/Users/joan/Documents-Local/Relay/RelayNou/main.gcno" "-resource-dir" "/Users/joan/LLVM-9/llvm-project/build/Debug/lib/clang/9.0.1" "-internal-isystem" "/Users/joan/LLVM-9/llvm-project/build/Debu...

...oach (please correct me if I did anything wrong): I am trying to explicitly control the optimisations passes in llvm. I disable optimisation in clang, but instead emit unoptimized llvm IR, and use opt to optimise that. These are what I do: * clang -O0 -S -mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns -emit-llvm -momit-leaf-frame-pointer a.c -o a.ll * opt -(PASSES) a.ll -o a.bc * llc a.bc -filetype=obj -o a.o To evaluate the effectiveness of optimisation passes, I started with an 'add-one-in' approach. The baseline is no optimisations passes, and I iterate through all the O1 passes and explicitly allow...

...9;m compiling with the following clang invocation: > > $ /usr/local/vendor/toolchains/llvm/3.3/armv7m/bin/armv7m-none-eabi-clang > -mcpu=cortex-m4 -mfloat-abi=soft -mthumb -nostdinc -ffreestanding > -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti > -fomit-frame-pointer -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -nostdinc -v -Os -S -o > a.s a.c > vendor-clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final) (based on LLVM 3.3) > Target: armv7m-none--eabi > Thread model: posix > "/usr/local/vendor-20130805-b8d59d2/toolchains/llvm/3.3/armv7m/bin/armv7m-none-eabi-clang" > -c...

...id anything wrong): > > I am trying to explicitly control the optimisations passes in llvm. I > disable optimisation in clang, but instead emit unoptimized llvm IR, and > use opt to optimise that. These are what I do: > > * clang -O0 -S -mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns -emit-llvm > -momit-leaf-frame-pointer a.c -o a.ll > * opt -(PASSES) a.ll -o a.bc > * llc a.bc -filetype=obj -o a.o > > To evaluate the effectiveness of optimisation passes, I started with an > 'add-one-in' approach. The baseline is no optimisations passes, and I > iterate through all the O1...

...he following clang invocation: >> >> $ /usr/local/vendor/toolchains/llvm/3.3/armv7m/bin/armv7m-none-eabi-clang >> -mcpu=cortex-m4 -mfloat-abi=soft -mthumb -nostdinc -ffreestanding >> -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti >> -fomit-frame-pointer -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -nostdinc -v -Os -S -o >> a.s a.c >> vendor-clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final) (based on LLVM 3.3) >> Target: armv7m-none--eabi >> Thread model: posix >> "/usr/local/vendor-20130805-b8d59d2/toolchains/llvm/3.3/armv7m/bin/armv7m-none-eabi...

...llowing clang invocation: > > > > $ /usr/local/vendor/toolchains/llvm/3.3/armv7m/bin/armv7m-none-eabi-clang > > -mcpu=cortex-m4 -mfloat-abi=soft -mthumb -nostdinc -ffreestanding > > -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti > > -fomit-frame-pointer -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -nostdinc -v -Os -S -o > > a.s a.c > > vendor-clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final) (based on LLVM 3.3) > > Target: armv7m-none--eabi > > Thread model: posix > > > "/usr/local/vendor-20130805-b8d59d2/toolchains/llvm/3.3/armv7m/bin/armv7m...

On 8 February 2013 14:28, David Given <dg at cowlark.com> wrote: > Debian's clang packages are totally broken on armhf --- the compiler > emits a confused warning about the platform being unrecognised, and then > generates softfloat code --- so I was wondering about LLVM itself. I'm using Ubuntu on Pandas and Chromebooks and LLVM itself behaves well, with the right set of

...ld/Debug+Asserts/bin/clang" -cc1 -triple armv4t--linux-gnueabi -E -disable-free -main-file-name hello.c -mrelocation-model static -mdisable-fp-elim -mconstructor-aliases -target-abi aapcs-linux -target-cpu arm7tdmi -mfloat-abi soft -target-feature +soft-float-abi -target-linker-version 2.20.1 -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -v -resource-dir /home/jedd10-04/TOOC/LLVM-3.1/llvm-3.1.src/build/Debug+Asserts/bin/../lib/clang/3.1 -isysroot /usr/arm-linux-gnueabi -fmodule-cache-path /var/tmp/clang-module-cache -internal-isystem /usr/arm-linux-gnueabi/usr/local/include -internal-isystem /home/jedd10-04/TOOC/...

Hi, I am trying to compare the loop vectorizers effectiveness for different targets relative to each other. That way, I am hoping to find loops that are not vectorized - but could be - on my target by finding other targets doing this successfully. With some luck, there might be something in the Target files that could be fixed with improved vectorization as a result... I would like to do

...quot; -cc1 -triple armv4t-unknown-linux-gnueabihf -S -disable-free -disable-llvm-verifier -main-file-name test.c -mrelocation-model static -mdisable-fp-elim -fmath-errno -mconstructor-aliases -fuse-init-array -target-abi aapcs-linux -target-cpu arm7tdmi -mfloat-abi hard -target-linker-version 2.22 -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -v -coverage-file /home/dg/shared/workspace/calculon/test.s -resource-dir /usr/bin/../lib/clang/3.2 -fmodule-cache-path /var/tmp/clang-module-cache -internal-isystem /usr/local/include -internal-isystem /usr/bin/../lib/clang/3.2/include -internal-isystem /usr/include/clang/3.2/in...

...putchar (0, ch); } I'm compiling with the following clang invocation: $ /usr/local/vendor/toolchains/llvm/3.3/armv7m/bin/armv7m-none-eabi-clang -mcpu=cortex-m4 -mfloat-abi=soft -mthumb -nostdinc -ffreestanding -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fomit-frame-pointer -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -nostdinc -v -Os -S -o a.s a.c vendor-clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final) (based on LLVM 3.3) Target: armv7m-none--eabi Thread model: posix "/usr/local/vendor-20130805-b8d59d2/toolchains/llvm/3.3/armv7m/bin/armv7m-none-eabi-clang" -cc1 -triple thumbv7em-none--eab...

Hello list I think I really finally found a way to crossbuild a binary for ARM using Clang/llvm. This message would be a documentation for someone who may concern for the same issue with me. - Target : TOSHIBA AC100 / Ubuntu 12.04 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/** TEGRA/AC100 <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/TEGRA/AC100>) - Host : i386 Desktop PC / Ubuntu 12.04 - Toolchain on host : sudo

...osix "/opt/kernelgen/bin/clang" -cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -emit-obj -mrelax-all -disable-free -main-file-name showdebug.c -mrelocation-model static -mdisable-fp-elim -fmath-errno -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases -munwind-tables -target-cpu x86-64 -target-linker-version 11 -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -v -coverage-file showdebug.o -resource-dir /opt/kernelgen/bin/../lib/clang/3.2 -fmodule-cache-path /var/tmp/clang-module-cache -internal-isystem /usr/local/include -internal-isystem /opt/kernelgen/bin/../lib/clang/3.2/include -internal-externc-isystem /include -internal-externc-...

.../data-race-test/clang_build_Linux/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -emit-obj -mrelax-all -disable-free -main-file-name t.c -mrelocation-model static -mdisable-fp-elim -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases -munwind-tables -target-cpu x86-64 -target-linker-version 2.20.1 -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -coverage-file t.o -resource-dir /usr/local/google/tsan-llvm/data-race-test/clang_build_Linux/Release+Asserts/bin/../lib/clang/3.1 -fmodule-cache-path /var/tmp/clang-module-cache -internal-isystem /usr/local/include -internal-isystem /usr/local/google/tsan-llvm/data-race-test/cla...

...clang -S -O3 -o test.s test.c -march=native -ccc-echo result: "D:/work/trunk/bin/Release/clang.exe" -cc1 -triple i686-pc-win32 -S -disable-fr e -disable-llvm-verifier -main-file-name test.c -mrelocation-model static -mdis ble-fp-elim -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases -target-cpu corei7 -momit-leaf- rame-pointer -coverage-file test.s -resource-dir "D:/work/trunk/bin/Release\\.. \lib\\clang\\3.1" -fmodule-cache-path "C:\\DOCUME~1\\ADMINI~1\\LOCALS~1\\Temp\\ lang-module-cache" -internal-isystem D:/work/trunk/bin/Release/../lib/clang/3.1 include -internal-isystem "C...

...const&) + 230863896 Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /Users/andreas/STM8S-Discovery/llvm-stm8/Debug +Asserts/bin/clang -cc1 -triple stm8-unknown-elf -S -disable-free - main-file-name hello.c -mrelocation-model static -mdisable-fp-elim - mconstructor-aliases -target-linker-version 85.2.1 -momit-leaf-frame- pointer -resource-dir /Users/andreas/STM8S-Discovery/llvm-stm8/Debug +Asserts/bin/../lib/clang/2.9 -ferror-limit 19 -fmessage-length 274 - fgnu-runtime -fdiagnostics-show-option -fcolor-diagnostics -o ../ hello.s -x c ../hello.c 1. <eof> parser at end of file clang: error: una...

Renato Golin wrote: [...] > Try setting armv7a-unknown-linux-gnueabihf and see if it works better. No, that doesn't work either. [...] > JIT was never the forte of ARM and I haven't tried yet, but I doubt > it'll be any Debian misconfiguration. The whole architecture > configuration is a bit odd... Debian's clang packages are totally broken on armhf --- the compiler