search for: molloy

.... It wouldn't take the LTO option; however, I can get it to inline using -cppgen=inline. However, when I run clang the second time it gives me an error, stating that it expects a top level entity. I think I've run into this issue before. Any ideas? On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:30 AM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > I see. Well, that shouldn't be an issue. If you link the bitcode files > together with llvm-link you can then do several things: > > (1) Run clang on it as you normally would with -O3 for maximum inlining > (2) Run '...

James, Sure. I want to inline functions in a C program that has no external node, or "main". So the "top" function is not main and there does not exist a main in the file. Thanks. On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:23 AM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > > Do you know if it's possible to inline functions without an external > node? > > Sorry, I don't know to what you're referring here. Could you please > rephrase? what do you mean be "external node"...

...um link time optimisations. (3) Run 'opt' manually with -O3, LTO which will produce another bitcode file, which you can then again give to Clang to codegen. Cheers, James ________________________________________ From: Ryan Taylor [ryta1203 at gmail.com] Sent: 12 March 2012 18:25 To: James Molloy Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Compiling Multiple Files James, Sure. I want to inline functions in a C program that has no external node, or "main". So the "top" function is not main and there does not exist a main in the file. Thanks. On Mon, Mar 12, 20...

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Tony Molloy <tony.molloy at ul.ie> wrote: > So any ideas. I may have missed this but what model laptop are we talking about? Brandon Vincent

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:25 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > > Also, if it can segfault for some pathetic input > > Surely that's a bug though, not seriously designed behaviour? > No. That is a design choice. > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 at 19:24 Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >...

...t with links embedded in e-mails. I use evolution. Embedded links do not appear in the e-mail but if I hover over a link location then it appears in the text box at the bottom of the page and I can select it. I suspect I'm missing some common font(s). Any ideas. Regards, Tony -- Tony Molloy <tony.molloy at ul.ie> Home

I believe it might actually. Do you know if it's possible to inline functions without an external node? It doesn't appear to be so. On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:24 AM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Ryan,**** > > ** ** > > I would just compile to multiple IR files then link them together with > llvm-link.**** > > ** ** > > Would that work for you?**** > > ** ** > > Cheers,**** > > ** ** > > Jame...

On Tuesday 22 November 2016 18:32:14 Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/22/2016 07:23 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > I am looking for a laptop to run CentOS 6/7. My university was a > > traditional Dell site so I've used Latitude laptops for years, > > currently E6500/E6510. > > Dell's Linux laptops are listed here: > > http://www.dell.com/learn/us/en/555/campai...

...Linux > for some time, I am a complete beginner to compiling etc. > > Do you have notes left? > You can install MATE for CentOS 8 from the stenstorp repo https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/stenstorp/MATE/ I've been using it for some time with no problems. Tony -- Tony Molloy <tony.molloy at ul.ie> Home

...ions without an external node? Sorry, I don't know to what you're referring here. Could you please rephrase? what do you mean be "external node"? Cheers, James ________________________________________ From: Ryan Taylor [ryta1203 at gmail.com] Sent: 12 March 2012 17:58 To: James Molloy Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Compiling Multiple Files I believe it might actually. Do you know if it's possible to inline functions without an external node? It doesn't appear to be so. On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:24 AM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com<mailt...

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:41 AM, James Molloy <james.molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi John,**** > > ** ** > > While this is a good idea, wouldn’t it logistically take longer to get the > microphone to the person involved than for the presenter to repeat the > question? > Have folks queue up in front of a fixed mic...

...on that it won't solve my problem and that we are failing into option (2). So to summarize, I would be nice if someone can confirm that debug informations generated on this specific case are correct for x86 32-bit and that I would have to deal with that. Thanks Best Regards Seb 2012/3/7 James Molloy <james.molloy at arm.com> > Hi Seb,**** > > ** ** > > I’m going to reiterate – Clang can decide when it wants to optimise away a > variable. You asked for that behaviour when you specified –O2. You can’t > expect deterministically the same behaviour on both x86 and x86-...

On 8 February 2016 at 19:25, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: >> For 16275, the fix is to disable loop vect. for no-fast-math + hasUnsafeAlgebra. > > Do you think there is a set of people that care about IEEE accuracy in so far that they don't want FTZ, but *are* happy to reassociate FP operations? That s...

Yeah, that's the fault...got the answer...... Thanks James for the help... Struggling with this for so many days....... On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:02 PM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Sarath,**** > > ** ** > > It would have really helped if you had removed the commented out code and > inlined the calls to your homemade helper functions before sending it...** > ** > > ** ** > > You are doing this, in L...

...cause, coincidentally, Clang's stdint.h uses the same layout and pre-processor built-ins as GCC. This is an implementation detail. Do not rely upon it. You should use Clang's stdint.h. Cheers, James From: Seung-yeon Choe [mailto:sychoe at gmail.com] Sent: 24 November 2011 05:42 To: James Molloy Cc: Anton Korobeynikov; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] arm neon intrinsics cross compile error on windows system Hello, I totally understood about this problem. codesourcery codebench arm eabi version uses newlibc. but, arm gnu/linux version uses glibc. hm.. actually there is no p...

On 29 February 2012 11:47, James Molloy <james.molloy at arm.com> wrote: >> (But if we only care about >> running on x86-64, this won't be a problem.) > > Please, no. We have a cortex-a9 native buildbot already in lab.llvm.org and > as manufacturers emit faster ARM chips we (ARM) will want to have LLVM run...

...); > > > /* > * create call to SHL function > */ > mCurrentFunction = previousFunction; > mBuilder.SetInsertPoint(previousBlock); > > return mBuilder.CreateCall2(shlFunction, aLHS, aRHS); > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com>wrote: > >> Hi Sarath, >> >> Your example will break. >> >> If the values are held internally as doubles casted to void* (which >> incidentally will only work on 64-bit systems), just casting void* -> int* >> will not ge...

...t standard library full set, right? On the other hand, even if I want to use other toolchain's glibc function, I have to replace them with headers in /lib/clang/*/include folder, right? Please show me the lights of solution one more time. :) Thanks and regards, Seung-yeon. 2011/11/24 James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> > Hi,**** > > ** ** > > Just to clarify, some header files are compiler specific. Stdint.h is one > of them. The reason your Ubuntu stdint.h works is because, coincidentally, > Clang’s stdint.h uses the same layout and pre-processor built-ins a...

...nt I'd raise is: if your value is stored as a double inside the Value structure, then why are you bitcasting to i64*? Why not bitcast to double* then load and perform a proper fptosi? Cheers, James From: sarath chandra [mailto:sarathcse19 at gmail.com] Sent: 22 September 2011 11:18 To: James Molloy; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Need help in converting int to double On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:46 PM, sarath chandra <sarathcse19 at gmail.com<mailto:sarathcse19 at gmail.com>> wrote: Hi James, First i converted the void * to int* and then did FPToSI...then did SHL......

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:16 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > > Correct > > Out of interest, how does LLD itself handle error reporting when invoked > from the command line, and how does it avoid segfaulting in that case? > It generally reports an error and exit, or in rare circumstances it just...