search for: moduledagtodagisel

...at I've run into is regarding the DAGToDAGIsel pass. We have a different subclass for mips16 and non mips16 ( conceivably later there could be a separate one for micromips). I need to run a different pass depending on whether it's mips16 or mips32. My initial plan was to create a dummy ModuleDAGToDAGIsel whose sole purpose in it's run machine function was to decide which one of these to run and then call an appropriate DAGToDAGIIsel but I'm running into some issue where that class wants to be started up by the pass manager and not another pass. So now I'm think that maybe I should ha...

...e have a different subclass for mips16 and non mips16 ( conceivably >> later there could be a separate one for micromips). >> >> >> I need to run a different pass depending on whether it's mips16 or >> mips32. >> >> My initial plan was to create a dummy ModuleDAGToDAGIsel whose sole >> purpose in it's run machine function was to decide which one of these >> to run and then call an appropriate DAGToDAGIIsel but I'm running into >> some issue where that class wants to be started up by the pass manager >> and not another pass. >> &...

...he DAGToDAGIsel pass. > > We have a different subclass for mips16 and non mips16 ( conceivably > later there could be a separate one for micromips). > > > I need to run a different pass depending on whether it's mips16 or mips32. > > My initial plan was to create a dummy ModuleDAGToDAGIsel whose sole > purpose in it's run machine function was to decide which one of these > to run and then call an appropriate DAGToDAGIIsel but I'm running into > some issue where that class wants to be started up by the pass manager > and not another pass. > > So now I'm t...

...for mips16 and non mips16 ( conceivably >>> later there could be a separate one for micromips). >>> >>> >>> I need to run a different pass depending on whether it's mips16 or >>> mips32. >>> >>> My initial plan was to create a dummy ModuleDAGToDAGIsel whose sole >>> purpose in it's run machine function was to decide which one of these >>> to run and then call an appropriate DAGToDAGIIsel but I'm running into >>> some issue where that class wants to be started up by the pass manager >>> and not another...

...conceivably >>>> later there could be a separate one for micromips). >>>> >>>> >>>> I need to run a different pass depending on whether it's mips16 or >>>> mips32. >>>> >>>> My initial plan was to create a dummy ModuleDAGToDAGIsel whose sole >>>> purpose in it's run machine function was to decide which one of these >>>> to run and then call an appropriate DAGToDAGIIsel but I'm running into >>>> some issue where that class wants to be started up by the pass manager >>>>...