search for: modulea

Hi all, I'm trying to use a function defined in one LLVM module from another module (in the JIT) but for some reason it's not working out. My sequence of activity is roughly like this: 1) Create moduleA 2) Create moduleB with "func()" 3) execEng = ExecutionEngine::create( new ExistingModuleProvider(moduleB)); 4) execute "func()" (this works fine) 4) add "func()" to moduleA as a declaration (no code blocks) with External linkage. 5) execEng->...

Michael Muller wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm trying to use a function defined in one LLVM module from another module > (in the JIT) but for some reason it's not working out. My sequence of > activity is roughly like this: > > 1) Create moduleA > 2) Create moduleB with "func()" > 3) execEng = ExecutionEngine::create( > new ExistingModuleProvider(moduleB)); > 4) execute "func()" (this works fine) > 4) add "func()" to moduleA as a declaration (no code blocks) with External >...

...Michael Muller wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to use a function defined in one LLVM module from another module >> (in the JIT) but for some reason it's not working out.  My sequence of >> activity is roughly like this: >> >>   1) Create moduleA >>   2) Create moduleB with "func()" >>   3) execEng = ExecutionEngine::create( >>          new ExistingModuleProvider(moduleB)); >>   4) execute "func()" (this works fine) >>   4) add "func()" to moduleA as a declaration (no code blocks)...

...CommonModule | ----------------- | | ModuleA Module B 1) Create and verify common module. 2) Create ModuleA, Link CommonModule to ModuleA and verify the new module. 3) Now we have a problem. Even though we wanted to repeat step (2) for Module B this fails due to CommonModule being "damaged" as the documentation says. Even thou...

...here is my experimental code: runOnModule(Module &M){ ... LLVMContext& context = getGlobalContext(); llvm::raw_fd_ostream osA("A.bc", "", llvm::sys::fs::F_None); llvm::raw_fd_ostream osB("B.bc", "", llvm::sys::fs::F_None); llvm::Module *ModuleA = new llvm::Module("A", context); llvm::Module *ModuleB = new llvm::Module("B", context); ModuleA->setDataLayout(M.getDataLayout()); ModuleA-->setTargetTriple(M.getTargetTriple()); ModuleA-->setModuleInlineAsm(M.getModuleInlineAsm()); ModuleB-->setDataLay...

...uden.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to use a function defined in one LLVM module from another module >> (in the JIT) but for some reason it's not working out. My sequence of >> activity is roughly like this: >> >> 1) Create moduleA >> 2) Create moduleB with "func()" >> 3) execEng = ExecutionEngine::create( >> new ExistingModuleProvider(moduleB)); >> 4) execute "func()" (this works fine) >> 4) add "func()" to moduleA as a declaration (no code blocks) with...

...>>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm trying to use a function defined in one LLVM module from another module >>> (in the JIT) but for some reason it's not working out. My sequence of >>> activity is roughly like this: >>> >>> 1) Create moduleA >>> 2) Create moduleB with "func()" >>> 3) execEng = ExecutionEngine::create( >>> new ExistingModuleProvider(moduleB)); >>> 4) execute "func()" (this works fine) >>> 4) add "func()" to moduleA as a declarati...

On 3 February 2010 14:13, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > I have not used the C api or the interpreter, but via JIT one can use > ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping(...) after the function decl in the > foreign module. See if there is an equivalent in the C API, which will > probably work for the interpreter given that this method is declared in >

Is there a preferred approach for an LLVM-based JIT-compiler to make calls from run-time generated functions in module A to bitcode-loaded functions in module B? A naive CallInst across the boundary fails verification. Calling it as an external function fails to resolve, even if both ModuleA and ModuleB are in the same ExecutionEngine. I can think of two ways around this: 1. Create a constant function pointer in ModuleA using the value from EE.getPointerToFunction(FunctionB). This seems trivial, but I am concerned it will prevent many optimizations. 2. Copy functions from ModuleB...

Is there a preferred approach for an LLVM-based JIT-compiler to make calls from run-time generated functions in module A to bitcode-loaded functions in module B? A naive CallInst across the boundary fails verification. Calling it as an external function fails to resolve, even if both ModuleA and ModuleB are in the same ExecutionEngine. I can think of two ways around this: 1. Create a constant function pointer in ModuleA using the value from EE.getPointerToFunction(FunctionB). This seems trivial, but I am concerned it will prevent many optimizations. 2. Copy functions from ModuleB...

..., Michael Muller <mmuller at enduden.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm trying to use a function defined in one LLVM module from another module > (in the JIT) but for some reason it's not working out.  My sequence of > activity is roughly like this: > >  1) Create moduleA >  2) Create moduleB with "func()" >  3) execEng = ExecutionEngine::create( >         new ExistingModuleProvider(moduleB)); >  4) execute "func()" (this works fine) >  4) add "func()" to moduleA as a declaration (no code blocks) with External >     li...

...all addresses right away. With the LLJIT as I finally understand, I will only get the addresses when I have resolved every references, which makes the code way safer. However, another thing of our system is, that each object file was loaded from a different process, so sometimes not all symbols for ModuleA were present because ModuleB was not loaded/requested yet. That was okay, so we kept resolving the undefined references of ModuleA until ModuleB was loaded and everything was fine. If I get it right… This would change now to having a single LLJIT representing the entire system. Each process would...

...notherModule = ModuleB.getFunction(callableName);</div><div>    auto functionType = functionInAnotherModule->getFunctionType();</div><div>    auto localFunction = llvm::Function::Create(functionType, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes::ExternalWeakLinkage, callableName, &ModuleA);</div><div> </div><div>    Function seems to be copied, together with complex types its using:</div><div>    ; ModuleID = 'JitModule'</div><div>    source_filename = "JitModule"   </div><div>    %struct._EN12RecordStream...

Hi dear Users, I''ve been looking in internet and on the puppet wiki website but i am still confused about this. Lets say I have 2 Modules: A and B What I want to do is call a class on module A directly from module B. I know it is possible to call different classes within a module by using inheritance and using different .pp config files. But how I do not know how to do the

...all addresses right away. With the LLJIT as I finally understand, I will only get the addresses when I have resolved every references, which makes the code way safer. However, another thing of our system is, that each object file was loaded from a different process, so sometimes not all symbols for ModuleA were present because ModuleB was not loaded/requested yet. That was okay, so we kept resolving the undefined references of ModuleA until ModuleB was loaded and everything was fine. If I get it right… This would change now to having a single LLJIT representing the entire system. Each process would...

Hey everyone, I felt this question is different from my other question - hope this is okay. So - I was playing around with the lookup function of the ExecutionSession and there are some things I don't understand. I have a .BC file with a function "?Sampler@@YAXXZ" referencing a value "?_Plansch_test@@3HA" that is not defined in that module itself. I first planed on not

Hi, I just put together a little mixin to provide pseudo-RESTful services in camping apps. Basically, it looks for a hidden _verb field in form posts, and sets the @method to the supplied value (e.g. put or delete - which browsers don''t support). This lets you define put and delete methods in your controllers. Groovy. Code: http://pastie.caboo.se/22613 Is there any permanent repo of

...all addresses right away. With the LLJIT as I finally understand, I will only get the addresses when I have resolved every references, which makes the code way safer. However, another thing of our system is, that each object file was loaded from a different process, so sometimes not all symbols for ModuleA were present because ModuleB was not loaded/requested yet. That was okay, so we kept resolving the undefined references of ModuleA until ModuleB was loaded and everything was fine. If I get it right… This would change now to having a single LLJIT representing the entire system. Each process would...

Hi group, im updating some modules of puppet, and i found this issue or error, that i cannot get resolved it. My puppetmaster is 2.7.1 and client 2.7.18. I used other modulo to prover apt configurations but i think this is more completed. I know that the error is something missing or my class is not present or something like that, the dependencies of the modulo are installed, stdlib and i