search for: module_

...nient. Here's a screenshot of what it looks like: [image: llbrowse.png] And here's what the node class for displaying variables looks like, as an example: class VariableItem : public TreeItemBase { public: VariableItem(const llvm::Module* module, const llvm::GlobalVariable* var) : module_(module), var_(var) {} // Overrides int GetIcon() const; wxString GetCaption() const; void CreateChildren(wxTreeCtrl* tree, const wxTreeItemId& id); bool CanCreateChildren() const; void ShowDetails(DetailsView* detailsView); private: const llvm::Module* const module_; const ll...

...t looks like: > > [image: llbrowse.png] > > And here's what the node class for displaying variables looks like, as an > example: > > class VariableItem : public TreeItemBase { > public: > VariableItem(const llvm::Module* module, const llvm::GlobalVariable* var) > : module_(module), var_(var) {} > > // Overrides > > int GetIcon() const; > wxString GetCaption() const; > void CreateChildren(wxTreeCtrl* tree, const wxTreeItemId& id); > bool CanCreateChildren() const; > void ShowDetails(DetailsView* detailsView); > > private: > const l...

...ke: > > [image: llbrowse.png] > > And here's what the node class for displaying variables looks like, as an > example: > > class VariableItem : public TreeItemBase { > public: > VariableItem(const llvm::Module* module, const llvm::GlobalVariable* var) > : module_(module), var_(var) {} > > // Overrides > > int GetIcon() const; > wxString GetCaption() const; > void CreateChildren(wxTreeCtrl* tree, const wxTreeItemId& id); > bool CanCreateChildren() const; > void ShowDetails(DetailsView* detailsView); > > private: &...

...ooks like: > > <llbrowse.png> > > And here's what the node class for displaying variables looks like, as an example: > > class VariableItem : public TreeItemBase { > public: > VariableItem(const llvm::Module* module, const llvm::GlobalVariable* var) > : module_(module), var_(var) {} > > // Overrides > > int GetIcon() const; > wxString GetCaption() const; > void CreateChildren(wxTreeCtrl* tree, const wxTreeItemId& id); > bool CanCreateChildren() const; > void ShowDetails(DetailsView* detailsView); > > privat...

...s like: > > [image: llbrowse.png] > > And here's what the node class for displaying variables looks like, as an > example: > > class VariableItem : public TreeItemBase { > public: > VariableItem(const llvm::Module* module, const llvm::GlobalVariable* var) > : module_(module), var_(var) {} > > // Overrides > > int GetIcon() const; > wxString GetCaption() const; > void CreateChildren(wxTreeCtrl* tree, const wxTreeItemId& id); > bool CanCreateChildren() const; > void ShowDetails(DetailsView* detailsView); > > private:...

...P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: widyono@seas.upenn.edu QAContact: rsync-qa@samba.org CC: widyono@seas.upenn.edu "list = no" correctly hides via rsync _server_::, however if one tries rsync _server_::_existing-module_/ and does not have permission, one gets @ERROR: access denied to _user_ from _client_, whereas an attempt for a non-existent module emits @ERROR: Unknown module '_non-existent-module_' If "list = no" is used for security purposes (can't think of another reason at the moment),...

...gt;> >> And here's what the node class for displaying variables looks like, as an >> example: >> >> class VariableItem : public TreeItemBase { >> public: >> VariableItem(const llvm::Module* module, const llvm::GlobalVariable* >> var) >> : module_(module), var_(var) {} >> >> // Overrides >> >> int GetIcon() const; >> wxString GetCaption() const; >> void CreateChildren(wxTreeCtrl* tree, const wxTreeItemId& id); >> bool CanCreateChildren() const; >> void ShowDetails(DetailsView* d...

...etails removed for clarity): void CodeGenerator::setDebugLocation(const SourceLocation & loc) { if (loc != dbgLocation_ && dbgContext_.isScope()) { dbgLocation_ = loc; if (loc.file == NULL) { builder_.SetCurrentDebugLocation(llvm::DebugLoc()); } else if (loc.file == module_->moduleSource()) { TokenPosition pos = tokenPosition(loc); // ** Comment out this line and the DIE errors disappear ** builder_.SetCurrentDebugLocation( DebugLoc::get(pos.beginLine, pos.beginCol, dbgContext_)); } } } As noted in the comment above, if I comment...

...ks like: > > <llbrowse.png> > > And here's what the node class for displaying variables looks like, as an > example: > > class VariableItem : public TreeItemBase { > public: > VariableItem(const llvm::Module* module, const llvm::GlobalVariable* var) > : module_(module), var_(var) {} > > // Overrides > > int GetIcon() const; > wxString GetCaption() const; > void CreateChildren(wxTreeCtrl* tree, const wxTreeItemId& id); > bool CanCreateChildren() const; > void ShowDetails(DetailsView* detailsView); > > private:...

...gt; void CodeGenerator::setDebugLocation(const SourceLocation & loc) { > if (loc != dbgLocation_ && dbgContext_.isScope()) { > dbgLocation_ = loc; > if (loc.file == NULL) { > builder_.SetCurrentDebugLocation(llvm::DebugLoc()); > } else if (loc.file == module_->moduleSource()) { > TokenPosition pos = tokenPosition(loc); > // ** Comment out this line and the DIE errors disappear ** > builder_.SetCurrentDebugLocation( > DebugLoc::get(pos.beginLine, pos.beginCol, dbgContext_)); > } > } > } > >...

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > I recently started getting this error when I try to debug my LLVM-compiled > program in GDB: > > Dwarf Error: Cannot find DIE at 0x16769 referenced from DIE at 0x1713c > [in module > /home/talin/Projects/tart/build-eclipse/test/stdlib/ReflectionTest] > > I'm not sure if it's something

I recently started getting this error when I try to debug my LLVM-compiled program in GDB: Dwarf Error: Cannot find DIE at 0x16769 referenced from DIE at 0x1713c [in module /home/talin/Projects/tart/build-eclipse/test/stdlib/ReflectionTest] I'm not sure if it's something I did or not. Is there any way to track down the cause of this error? The hex addresses in the error message are

...terisk+festival+installation speech-tools compiles OK, but I got this error when compiling asterisk if I compile without the patch it compiles, but of cause did'nt work with asterisk. any clue ? /Hans-Henrik Andresen Making in directory src/modules/base ... making dependencies -- modules.cc module_support.cc parameters.cc ff.cc pos.cc p hrasify.cc word.cc postlex.cc phrinfo.cc g++ -c -fno-implicit-templates -O3 -Wall -Wno-non-template-friend -Wno-depre cate d -I../include -I../../../src/include -I../../../../speech_tools/include modules .cc In file included from ../../../../speech_tools/inclu...

...re the limit is reached being consistent and > repeatable. My inclination would be to not allow parallel compilation when > opt-bisect is enabled. I don't have a strong opinion here, but just as a data point: my mental model here is to expect bisect to expect a deterministic outcome _per module_. That model isn't threatened by parallel execution. Cheers, Philip > I can imagine cases where you might specifically want to debug something > that only happens in a parallel build, but it's more difficult to imagine > something that only happens in a parallel build and doesn&...

...or::setDebugLocation(const SourceLocation & loc) { >> if (loc != dbgLocation_ && dbgContext_.isScope()) { >> dbgLocation_ = loc; >> if (loc.file == NULL) { >> builder_.SetCurrentDebugLocation(llvm::DebugLoc()); >> } else if (loc.file == module_->moduleSource()) { >> TokenPosition pos = tokenPosition(loc); >> // ** Comment out this line and the DIE errors disappear ** >> builder_.SetCurrentDebugLocation( >> DebugLoc::get(pos.beginLine, pos.beginCol, dbgContext_)); >> } >&g...

....20170105". Peter > > > > > >> >> Peter >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> writes: >>>> > With -Wl,-gc-sections I get this: >>>> > SimpleTest.cpp:(.text.sancov.module_ctor[sancov.module_ctor]+0x1b): >>>> > undefined reference to `__start___sancov_pcs' >>>> > SimpleTest.cpp:(.text.sancov.module_ctor[sancov.module_ctor]+0x20): >>>> > undefined reference to `__stop___sancov_pcs' >>>> > >>>&...

...C) += relocate_kernel_ obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP) += crash_dump_$(BITS).o obj-$(CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ) += numaq_32.o obj-$(CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT_NUMA) += summit_32.o -obj-$(CONFIG_X86_VSMP) += vsmp_64.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PARAVIRT) += vsmp_64.o obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES) += module_$(BITS).o obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SRAT) += srat_32.o -- 1.4.2

...t;> Peter > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> writes: > >>>>> > With -Wl,-gc-sections I get this: > >>>>> > SimpleTest.cpp:(.text.sancov.module_ctor[sancov.module_ > ctor]+0x1b): > >>>>> > undefined reference to `__start___sancov_pcs' > >>>>> > SimpleTest.cpp:(.text.sancov.module_ctor[sancov.module_ > ctor]+0x20): > >>>>> > undefined reference to `__stop___sancov_pcs...

...hed being consistent and repeatable. My inclination would > be to not allow parallel compilation when opt-bisect is enabled. > > I don't have a strong opinion here, but just as a data point: my > mental model here is to expect bisect to expect a deterministic > outcome _per module_. That model isn't threatened by parallel execution. > > Cheers, > > Philip > > I can imagine cases where you might specifically want to debug > something that only happens in a parallel build, but it's more > difficult to imagine something that only happe...

Greetings! As the generic Pass Instrumentation framework for new pass manager is finally *in*, I'm glad to start the discussion on implementation of -opt-bisect through that framework. As it has already been discovered while porting other features (namely, -time-passes) blindly copying the currently existing legacy implementation is most likely not a perfect way forward. Now is a chance