Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "modula3".
Did you mean:
modular
2015 Oct 17
3
The future of LLVM's C APIs: Notes and BoF.
(Moving this to llvm-dev)
On Friday, October 16, 2015, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote:
> Some users of llvm-c want stable API interfaces into various parts of
> the LLVM infrasture, others want further ABI guarantees about this
> usage, and still others simply want a way to bind to LLVM through their
> language frontend’s existing FFI support for C.
>
> If
2015 Oct 22
2
The future of LLVM's C APIs: Notes and BoF.
...hope to have a good idea of what people are actually
>> using
>> these APIs for, and both to support stable API users less haphazardly
>> and to make unstable API more thorough and/or easier to create.
>>
>>
> One actual use:
>
> A couple of us in the Modula3 support community are working on splicing a
> llvm back end onto our Modula3 compiler front end. We have zero-thickness
> bindings written in Modula3 which match C bindings like core.h. In our
> front
> end executable, we only build llvm IR in memory, then use
> LLVMPrintModuleToFi...
2008 Sep 10
2
Fixing cvsup bus error
I'm getting the bus error mentioned in PR bin/124353 and I need a bit
more detail on how to apply the patch.
Right now I'm getting the following error when I try to do a make on
cvsup-without-gui:
Fatal Error: bad version stamps: SupTCP.m3
I put the changes in the
/usr/local/lib/m3/pkg/m3core/src/unix/freebsd-4.amd64/Unix.i3 file
I created the file
2014 Dec 05
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Semantic changes in the Metadata/Value split
> On 2014-Dec-05, at 00:39, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 06:44:36PM -0800, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote:
>> As of Monday, I finally got a preliminary patch passing check and
>> check-clang with the metadata-value split.
>
> Do you have the Go bindings enabled? Because of the changes you made to the
> DIBuilder
2004 Oct 26
5
please test: Secure ports tree updating
CVSup is slow, insecure, and a memory hog. However, until now
it's been the only option for keeping an up-to-date ports tree,
and (thanks to all of the recent work on vuxml and portaudit)
it has become quite obvious that keeping an up-to-date ports
tree is very important.
To provide a secure, lightweight, and fast alternative to CVSup,
I've written portsnap. As the name suggests, this