search for: modification

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [root@divide mdonada]# smbldap-populate Using builtin directory structure adding new entry: dc=auroraalimentos,dc=com,dc=br failed to add entry: modifications require authentication at /usr/sbin/smbldap-populate line 389, <GEN1> line 2. adding new entry: ou=Users,dc=auroraalimentos,dc=com,dc=br failed to add entry: modifications require authentication at /usr/sbin/smbldap-populate line 389, <GEN1> line 3. adding new entry: ou=Groups,dc=auror...

...) entry dc=gruporesasco,dc=local already exist. entry ou=People,dc=gruporesasco,dc=local already exist. entry ou=Groups,dc=gruporesasco,dc=local already exist. adding new entry: ou=Machines,dc=gruporesasco,dc=local failed to add entry: modifications require authentication at /usr/sbin/smbldap- populate line 499, <GEN1> line 22. adding new entry: ou=Idmap,dc=gruporesasco,dc=local failed to add entry: modifications require authentication at /usr/sbin/smbldap- populate line 499,...

When a file of same length already exists at the destination then the command 'rsync --archive --size-only' (--archive is same as -rlptgoD) may change the modification time of the destination file even if no modification was made. Type the following commands in a terminal in order to reproduce the problem: $ mkdir source $ mkdir target $ echo "file one" > source/file $ echo "file two" > target/file $ srcstamp=201111110000.11 $ tgtsta...

Recently, our backup software oddly decided to rebackup a good portion of our file server instead of just doing an incremental. When I examined various sets of presumably identical files, I discovered that the modification dates on these files were no longer the same. Many files were re-dated to exactly one hour later such that if a file had been modified on 3/24/04 at 2:24:53 PM, it's modification date had somehow been changed to 3/24/04 at 3:24:53 PM. A point to note that is that this server is actually two...

Hi all I have a problem where notification about file modification (edited text file) is not passed from one Windows7 to another Windows through Samba. Monitoring is done via custom application that recursively watches for all events on certain directory watchfolder. Strangely all events are passed through fine in watchfolder itself (including file modification)....

Hi My code is as following: #include <R.h> #include <Rinternals.h> //* the Projector part *// void Projector(double *L, int *dimL, double *G, int *dimG, double *W, int *dimW, int *xymod, int *dimxy, double *modif, int *dimif, double *Lsum) { ...} //* the interface part *// #define getDim(A) INTEGER(coerceVector(getAttrib(A,R_DimSymbol), INTSXP)) SEXP Projector5(SEXP L, SEXP G,

How do I transfer just the modification times with rsync? I now the file content is the same but the modification times are different. Is there a way to do this? Every way that I have tried causes the whole file to transfer as well. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.s...

...% sure your file data matches you should not be using --size-only. On 06/11/2017 09:28 AM, max.power--- via rsync wrote: > When a file of same length already exists at the destination then the > command 'rsync --archive --size-only' (--archive is same as -rlptgoD) > may change the modification time of the destination file even if no > modification was made. > > Type the following commands in a terminal in order to reproduce the > problem: > > $ mkdir source > $ mkdir target > $ echo "file one" > source/file > $ echo "file two" > targ...

...your suggestion the times do transfer over. I don't know why... B ________________________________________ From: rsync [rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org] on behalf of Kevin Korb via rsync [rsync at lists.samba.org] Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 2:58 PM To: rsync at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: modification times questions If you are sure the content is correct you can run rsync with both --times and --size-only. This will cause rsync to "fix" the timestamps on files that are the same size on both ends. On 04/07/2017 02:53 PM, McDowell, Blake via rsync wrote: > How do I transfer just t...

In order to get the Oneac UPS (models ON700XAU, ON1000XAU, ON1500XAU) to work with NUT, I had to make a few minor modifications to the oneac driver. I've attached a patch with all the modifications. I tried to ensure that my modifications would not break any existing functionality, but I could not be sure without a legacy Oneac UPS to test against. In my investigation, I found out that the ONEAC Serial Interface scan...

...?* > > If you pass -build-id to the linker, the linker computes a hash of an > entire output file and append it to a .note section. This is not intended > to be a checksum but more like just a unique identifier. But you might be > able to use it as a checksum and detect any post-link modification by > recomputing build-id and compare it with the content of a .note section. > > *What kind of post-link modification are you expecting?* > > The first thing that comes to mind is strip command which removes debug > info and symbol table. But it looks like you are expecting more...

...matches you should not be using --size-only. > > On 06/11/2017 09:28 AM, max.power--- via rsync wrote: >> When a file of same length already exists at the destination then the >> command 'rsync --archive --size-only' (--archive is same as -rlptgoD) >> may change the modification time of the destination file even if no >> modification was made. >> >> Type the following commands in a terminal in order to reproduce the >> problem: >> >> $ mkdir source >> $ mkdir target >> $ echo "file one" > source/file >> $ e...

...r and also net ads join worked well I can access shares based on the user in my DC, I am not using ACL, only the permission in the system and DC. My problem can be described in the following way. - getent group and getent passwd work well , when I add or delete a user from one group the modification is displayed with getent - I chown user:group over a file in samba the user from that group can access it - BUT when I delete the user from the group in my DC ,he/she can still acces the share even after 24hours until I restart samba and winbind - after restart he/she is...

Hi. I have to make some minor modifications to the text.tree function - I don't like the way it prints the split labels (they are too long in my case and overlap). I tried to make s simple modification to the text.tree function so that it will limit the number of significant digits in tree labels, but could not - the original function u...

Hello list, is there any way to retrieve the last modification time from a Xapian::Database object? TIA Ralf Mattes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.xapian.org/pipermail/xapian-de...

...aded from 2.2.3 (or whatever Debian stable has) to 3.0.4 (using the Debian packages available via the Samba mirrors). I'm running it on Debian GNU/Linux stable x86, kernel 2.4.25. I noticed that whenever I open a file using a Windows (I'm using Windows 2000) application, Samba changes its modification time to the current time. The old modification time is restored when the windows application quits / closes the file. This causes all kinds of trouble, especially with Emacs' auto-revert-mode. Is there a way to disable this behaviour? -- Hannu

I am using a Samba 3.0.21a share to centrally access my source code from multiple Windows workstations. Everything works as expected (in Samba), but there is a slight (but annoying) problem with the modification timestamp of the files on the Samba share. While I have verified that both server and workstation are synchronized to the same time (using NTP), it seems that there is a few milliseconds skew that Samba introduces which is enough to confuse the build utility and causes it to ignore certain depende...

...t 07:19, Volker Lendecke [via Samba] < ml-node+s2283325n4697188h90 at n4.nabble.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:57:34AM -0800, ivenhov wrote: > > Hi > > > > Does anyone had similar issues in the past? > > I still cannot find reason why notification of file modification of > files in > > subdirs is not visible on client machines > > Someone needs to send network traces and debug level 10 logs > for this. And try to reproduce the same against a Windows > server. > > Volker > > -- > SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen &...

...I'm implementing a watermarking feature for lld that computes a hash of loadable segments and places the result in a note section. Ongoing work can be found here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70316 https://reviews.llvm.org/D66426 The purpose of this watermark is to enable detection of post-link modifications to the loadable segments of the binary. Such modifications may produce a binary that relies on functionality that is an incidental detail of the OS that may change in a future update and negatively affect the runtime behaviour of the binary. As well as identifying reliance on unspecified behaviou...

http://www.nabble.com/file/p25336596/Conductivity1.jpeg I need a little help making modifications to the image included with this post. First, rather than using a linear color legend to display the output I would like to use a log-scale legend. Thus, the legend on the right would go from 1 to 1000, for example, with a classic log-scale gradation. What I hope to avoid is taking the log of th...