search for: modification

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [root@divide mdonada]# smbldap-populate Using builtin directory structure adding new entry: dc=auroraalimentos,dc=com,dc=br failed to add entry: modifications require authentication at /usr/sbin/smbldap-populate line 389, <GEN1> line 2. adding new entry: ou=Users,dc=auroraalimentos,dc=com,dc=br failed to add entry: modifications require authentication at /usr/sbin/smbldap-populate line 389, <GEN1> line 3. adding new entry: ou=Groups,dc=auror...

...) entry dc=gruporesasco,dc=local already exist. entry ou=People,dc=gruporesasco,dc=local already exist. entry ou=Groups,dc=gruporesasco,dc=local already exist. adding new entry: ou=Machines,dc=gruporesasco,dc=local failed to add entry: modifications require authentication at /usr/sbin/smbldap- populate line 499, <GEN1> line 22. adding new entry: ou=Idmap,dc=gruporesasco,dc=local failed to add entry: modifications require authentication at /usr/sbin/smbldap- populate line 499,...

When a file of same length already exists at the destination then the command 'rsync --archive --size-only' (--archive is same as -rlptgoD) may change the modification time of the destination file even if no modification was made. Type the following commands in a terminal in order to reproduce the problem: $ mkdir source $ mkdir target $ echo "file one" > source/file $ echo "file two" > target/file $ srcstamp=201111110000.11 $ tgtsta...

Hello, I have a question about how/why rsync updates modification times, which I haven?t been able to find an answer to. I have two locally connected storage devices running TrueNAS Core: one is new and empty, while the other is filled with files. When I run the following rsync command: rsync -avPh --itemize-changes --stats "${@}" to transfer files...

...he timestamp is different and I'm not fixing it.". If the file wasn't being modified the timestamp wouldn't be different and rsync would have just skipped it. On 10/9/24 14:06, McDowell, Blake via rsync wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question about how/why rsync updates modification times, which > I haven?t been able to find an answer to. > > I have two locally connected storage devices running TrueNAS Core: one > is new and empty, while the other is filled with files. > > When I run the following rsync command: > > /rsync -avPh --itemize-changes -...

Recently, our backup software oddly decided to rebackup a good portion of our file server instead of just doing an incremental. When I examined various sets of presumably identical files, I discovered that the modification dates on these files were no longer the same. Many files were re-dated to exactly one hour later such that if a file had been modified on 3/24/04 at 2:24:53 PM, it's modification date had somehow been changed to 3/24/04 at 3:24:53 PM. A point to note that is that this server is actually two...

...s instance is not back-dating the timestamp of the copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of transfer and leaving it that way. Then any time I rerun that command it always updates the timestamp since it is always making it the time of transfer. I have a source file the has a modification date of 2015 and when I rsync it to day with -a the copied file has a modification date of today. Again, this only happens on files that I use rsync to copy for the first time over to empty storage. If I drag and drop the timestamp stays the same as the source file and any rsync -a commands subseq...

...ating the timestamp of the > copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of > transfer and leaving it that way. Then any time I rerun that command it > always updates the timestamp since it is always making it the time of > transfer. I have a source file the has a modification date of 2015 and > when I rsync it to day with -a the copied file has a modification date > of today. > > Again, this only happens on files that I use rsync to copy for the first > time over to empty storage. If I drag and drop the timestamp stays the > same as the source fil...

Hi all I have a problem where notification about file modification (edited text file) is not passed from one Windows7 to another Windows through Samba. Monitoring is done via custom application that recursively watches for all events on certain directory watchfolder. Strangely all events are passed through fine in watchfolder itself (including file modification)....

Hi My code is as following: #include <R.h> #include <Rinternals.h> //* the Projector part *// void Projector(double *L, int *dimL, double *G, int *dimG, double *W, int *dimW, int *xymod, int *dimxy, double *modif, int *dimif, double *Lsum) { ...} //* the interface part *// #define getDim(A) INTEGER(coerceVector(getAttrib(A,R_DimSymbol), INTSXP)) SEXP Projector5(SEXP L, SEXP G,

How do I transfer just the modification times with rsync? I now the file content is the same but the modification times are different. Is there a way to do this? Every way that I have tried causes the whole file to transfer as well. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.s...

...% sure your file data matches you should not be using --size-only. On 06/11/2017 09:28 AM, max.power--- via rsync wrote: > When a file of same length already exists at the destination then the > command 'rsync --archive --size-only' (--archive is same as -rlptgoD) > may change the modification time of the destination file even if no > modification was made. > > Type the following commands in a terminal in order to reproduce the > problem: > > $ mkdir source > $ mkdir target > $ echo "file one" > source/file > $ echo "file two" > targ...

...your suggestion the times do transfer over. I don't know why... B ________________________________________ From: rsync [rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org] on behalf of Kevin Korb via rsync [rsync at lists.samba.org] Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 2:58 PM To: rsync at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: modification times questions If you are sure the content is correct you can run rsync with both --times and --size-only. This will cause rsync to "fix" the timestamps on files that are the same size on both ends. On 04/07/2017 02:53 PM, McDowell, Blake via rsync wrote: > How do I transfer just t...

In order to get the Oneac UPS (models ON700XAU, ON1000XAU, ON1500XAU) to work with NUT, I had to make a few minor modifications to the oneac driver. I've attached a patch with all the modifications. I tried to ensure that my modifications would not break any existing functionality, but I could not be sure without a legacy Oneac UPS to test against. In my investigation, I found out that the ONEAC Serial Interface scan...

...?* > > If you pass -build-id to the linker, the linker computes a hash of an > entire output file and append it to a .note section. This is not intended > to be a checksum but more like just a unique identifier. But you might be > able to use it as a checksum and detect any post-link modification by > recomputing build-id and compare it with the content of a .note section. > > *What kind of post-link modification are you expecting?* > > The first thing that comes to mind is strip command which removes debug > info and symbol table. But it looks like you are expecting more...

...matches you should not be using --size-only. > > On 06/11/2017 09:28 AM, max.power--- via rsync wrote: >> When a file of same length already exists at the destination then the >> command 'rsync --archive --size-only' (--archive is same as -rlptgoD) >> may change the modification time of the destination file even if no >> modification was made. >> >> Type the following commands in a terminal in order to reproduce the >> problem: >> >> $ mkdir source >> $ mkdir target >> $ echo "file one" > source/file >> $ e...

...r and also net ads join worked well I can access shares based on the user in my DC, I am not using ACL, only the permission in the system and DC. My problem can be described in the following way. - getent group and getent passwd work well , when I add or delete a user from one group the modification is displayed with getent - I chown user:group over a file in samba the user from that group can access it - BUT when I delete the user from the group in my DC ,he/she can still acces the share even after 24hours until I restart samba and winbind - after restart he/she is...

Hi. I have to make some minor modifications to the text.tree function - I don't like the way it prints the split labels (they are too long in my case and overlap). I tried to make s simple modification to the text.tree function so that it will limit the number of significant digits in tree labels, but could not - the original function u...

Hello list, is there any way to retrieve the last modification time from a Xapian::Database object? TIA Ralf Mattes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.xapian.org/pipermail/xapian-de...

...aded from 2.2.3 (or whatever Debian stable has) to 3.0.4 (using the Debian packages available via the Samba mirrors). I'm running it on Debian GNU/Linux stable x86, kernel 2.4.25. I noticed that whenever I open a file using a Windows (I'm using Windows 2000) application, Samba changes its modification time to the current time. The old modification time is restored when the windows application quits / closes the file. This causes all kinds of trouble, especially with Emacs' auto-revert-mode. Is there a way to disable this behaviour? -- Hannu