search for: mntget

...one last year > openSUSE tumblweed (with kernel 5.16.2), this umount issue doesn't exist. > So there is a possibility one ocfs2 commit introduced this issue. >You can checkout each mailine version like Linux 6.0, 6.1, ... and try to check if it can be reproduced. I've tried trace mntget/mntput using the following bpftrace script, link-cp output shows it misses a fput. #include <linux/mount.h> #include <linux/string.h> kprobe:mntget { $n = ((struct vfsmount *)arg0)->mnt_sb->s_type->name; if (!strncmp(str($n), "ocfs2", 5)) { @[comm] += 1; pri...

...>>> You can checkout each mailine version like Linux 6.0, 6.1, ... and try >>> to check if it can be reproduced. >> >> I drop this method, my machine cpu is old, compiling kernel will take too much >> time. >> >>> >>> I've tried trace mntget/mntput using the following bpftrace script, >>> link-cp output shows it misses a fput. >>> >>> #include <linux/mount.h> >>> #include <linux/string.h> >>> >>> kprobe:mntget >>> { >>> $n = ((struct vfsmount *)arg0)-&...

...So there is a possibility one ocfs2 commit introduced this issue. >You can checkout each mailine version like Linux 6.0, 6.1, ... and try > to check if it can be reproduced. I drop this method, my machine cpu is old, compiling kernel will take too much time. > > I've tried trace mntget/mntput using the following bpftrace script, > link-cp output shows it misses a fput. > > #include <linux/mount.h> > #include <linux/string.h> > > kprobe:mntget > { > $n = ((struct vfsmount *)arg0)->mnt_sb->s_type->name; > > if (!strncmp(str($n...

...commit introduced this issue. > >You can checkout each mailine version like Linux 6.0, 6.1, ... and try > > to check if it can be reproduced. > > I drop this method, my machine cpu is old, compiling kernel will take too much > time. > > > > > I've tried trace mntget/mntput using the following bpftrace script, > > link-cp output shows it misses a fput. > > > > #include <linux/mount.h> > > #include <linux/string.h> > > > > kprobe:mntget > > { > > $n = ((struct vfsmount *)arg0)->mnt_sb->s_type-&gt...

...ut each mailine version like Linux 6.0, 6.1, ... and try >>>> to check if it can be reproduced. >>> >>> I drop this method, my machine cpu is old, compiling kernel will take too much >>> time. >>> >>>> >>>> I've tried trace mntget/mntput using the following bpftrace script, >>>> link-cp output shows it misses a fput. >>>> >>>> #include <linux/mount.h> >>>> #include <linux/string.h> >>>> >>>> kprobe:mntget >>>> { >>>>...

On 2/24/23 3:52 PM, Joseph Qi wrote: > > > On 2/24/23 3:48 PM, Heming Zhao via Ocfs2-devel wrote: >> On 2/24/23 2:54 PM, Joseph Qi wrote: >>> I can reproduce this in my local VM. >>> I've traced ocfs2_dismount_volume and found that it hasn't been called. >>> So EBUSY is returned in VFS layer. I guess something wrong when doing >>> a copy

...node *inode; > struct super_block *sb; > > this.name = name; > this.len = strlen(name); > this.hash = 0; > sb = movable_mnt.mnt_sb; > patch.denty = d_alloc_pseudo(movable_inode_mnt->mnt_sb, &this); > patch.mnt = mntget(movable_inode_mnt); > > inode = new_inode(sb); > .. > .. > inode->i_mapping->a_ops = a_ops; > d_instantiate(path.dentry, inode); > > return alloc_file(&path, FMODE_WRITE | FMODE_READ, f_op); > } > &gt...

...node *inode; > struct super_block *sb; > > this.name = name; > this.len = strlen(name); > this.hash = 0; > sb = movable_mnt.mnt_sb; > patch.denty = d_alloc_pseudo(movable_inode_mnt->mnt_sb, &this); > patch.mnt = mntget(movable_inode_mnt); > > inode = new_inode(sb); > .. > .. > inode->i_mapping->a_ops = a_ops; > d_instantiate(path.dentry, inode); > > return alloc_file(&path, FMODE_WRITE | FMODE_READ, f_op); > } > &gt...

On 06/16/2016 11:07 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:12:07AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 06/16/2016 05:56 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:15:04PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>>> On 06/15/2016 08:02 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at

On 06/16/2016 11:07 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:12:07AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 06/16/2016 05:56 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:15:04PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>>> On 06/15/2016 08:02 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at

...struct qstr this; struct inode *inode; struct super_block *sb; this.name = name; this.len = strlen(name); this.hash = 0; sb = movable_mnt.mnt_sb; patch.denty = d_alloc_pseudo(movable_inode_mnt->mnt_sb, &this); patch.mnt = mntget(movable_inode_mnt); inode = new_inode(sb); .. .. inode->i_mapping->a_ops = a_ops; d_instantiate(path.dentry, inode); return alloc_file(&path, FMODE_WRITE | FMODE_READ, f_op); } And in our driver, we can change vma->vm_file with...

.../0xd5 [ext3] Jul 19 06:25:21 placka kernel: [207743.756056] [<ffffffff81102de9>] ? d_alloc_and_lookup+0x3a/0x60 Jul 19 06:25:21 placka kernel: [207743.756056] [<ffffffff8110388d>] ? walk_component+0x219/0x406 Jul 19 06:25:21 placka kernel: [207743.756056] [<ffffffff811103c2>] ? mntget+0x17/0x1c Jul 19 06:25:21 placka kernel: [207743.756056] [<ffffffff81104721>] ? path_lookupat+0x7c/0x2bd Jul 19 06:25:21 placka kernel: [207743.756056] [<ffffffff81036628>] ? should_resched+0x5/0x23 Jul 19 06:25:21 placka kernel: [207743.756056] [<ffffffff8134f274>] ? _cond_res...

Hi, Is the http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6-xen.hg tree still being updated? if not, what''s the preferred Linux tree to track that has all of the Xen bits? Thanks, Muli _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel