Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "mnsq".
Did you mean:
masq
2006 Apr 27
1
? bug in 'sample' (PR#8813)
...is code in Splus, the results
are the same. Also, if I set the size argument to be the same (or
eliminate this line altogether), I get reproducible results.=20=20
=20
I'm using R 2.2.0
=20
Thanks,
-Lori
=20
test.fun<-function(nsamp, mu,q, seed, nsim=3D2){
set.seed(seed)=20=20=20=20
mnsq<-rep(NA,nsim)
for (i in 1:nsim){
y<-rnorm(nsamp,mean=3Dmu)
yboot<-sample(y, size=3Dq, replace=3DT)
mnsq[i]<-(mean(y)^2)
}
return(mnsq)
}
=20
test.fun(50,0,30,12345)
test.fun(50,0,10,12345)
=20
Lori E. Dodd, Ph.D.
National Cancer Institute
Biometric Research Branch
6130 Ex...
2012 Nov 08
0
mirt vs. eRm vs. ltm vs. winsteps
...,"x5","x6","x7")
ltm$loc<-rowSums(ltm)/3
ltm<-round(ltm[order(ltm$loc,decreasing=TRUE),],2)
ltm #I get the following order of item parameters:x2,x3,x4,x7,x1,x5,x6
And this is what I got using winsteps.
| | INFIT | OUTFIT |
item| loc |MNSQ ZSTD|MNSQ ZSTD|
------|---------+----------+----------+
x7 | .49 | .62 -1.4|1.05 .3|
x2 | .30 |1.02 .2|1.27 .9|
x3 | .24 | 1.14 .6|1.05 .3|
x4 | .00 | .88 -.4| .80 -.6|
x1 | -.11 | .91 -.3| .88 -.3|
x5 | -.28 | 1...