Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "mnost".
Did you mean:
nost
2004 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] More Encoding Ideas
...e bytecode file size if we could
eliminate the redundant (namespace) parts of each symbol. Essentially,
we'd be replacing the portion of a symbol's name with a vbr_uint to the
namespace object.
Anyway, this is a larger design question that needs a larger audience.
I'd want to hear from mnost of the other developers on this topic.
>
> Gosh, but at the very least, since it's a special case anyway, we could
> shrink this field down to a byte.
It will go away in version 1.4.
> Come to think of it, you could still have multiple seperate LLVM modules in
> a file with...
2004 Aug 21
2
[LLVMdev] More Encoding Ideas
At 02:05 PM 8/20/2004, you wrote:
>Robert Mykland wrote:
>>Dear Chris and Reid:
>
>Hi Robert.
>
>>Some other random ideas I've had as I've been sifting through the new
>>bytecode format. Please let me know what you think.
>>1) ANSI C allows for char to default to unsigned char. This is I guess
>>not how it normally is in GCC. If char defaulted