search for: mnost

...e bytecode file size if we could eliminate the redundant (namespace) parts of each symbol. Essentially, we'd be replacing the portion of a symbol's name with a vbr_uint to the namespace object. Anyway, this is a larger design question that needs a larger audience. I'd want to hear from mnost of the other developers on this topic. > > Gosh, but at the very least, since it's a special case anyway, we could > shrink this field down to a byte. It will go away in version 1.4. > Come to think of it, you could still have multiple seperate LLVM modules in > a file with...

At 02:05 PM 8/20/2004, you wrote: >Robert Mykland wrote: >>Dear Chris and Reid: > >Hi Robert. > >>Some other random ideas I've had as I've been sifting through the new >>bytecode format. Please let me know what you think. >>1) ANSI C allows for char to default to unsigned char. This is I guess >>not how it normally is in GCC. If char defaulted