Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "mmptr".
Did you mean:
memptr
2020 Apr 04
0
[PATCH 1/6] amdgpu: a NULL ->mm does not mean a thread is a kthread
...mdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
index 13feb313e9b3..4db143c19dcc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ uint8_t amdgpu_amdkfd_get_xgmi_hops_count(struct kgd_dev *dst, struct kgd_dev *s
pagefault_disable(); \
if ((mmptr) == current->mm) { \
valid = !get_user((dst), (wptr)); \
- } else if (current->mm == NULL) { \
+ } else if (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD) { \
use_mm(mmptr); \
valid = !get_user((dst), (wptr)); \
unuse_mm(mmptr); \
--
2.25.1
2020 Apr 04
0
[PATCH 5/6] kernel: better document the use_mm/unuse_mm API contract
...dkfd.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
index bce5e93fefc8..63db84e09408 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
@@ -192,9 +192,9 @@ uint8_t amdgpu_amdkfd_get_xgmi_hops_count(struct kgd_dev *dst, struct kgd_dev *s
if ((mmptr) == current->mm) { \
valid = !get_user((dst), (wptr)); \
} else if (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD) { \
- use_mm(mmptr); \
+ kthread_use_mm(mmptr); \
valid = !get_user((dst), (wptr)); \
- unuse_mm(mmptr); \
+ kthread_unuse_mm(mmptr); \
} \
pag...
2020 Apr 16
0
[PATCH 2/3] kernel: better document the use_mm/unuse_mm API contract
...dkfd.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
index b820c8fc689f..b063bd7f41d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
@@ -192,9 +192,9 @@ uint8_t amdgpu_amdkfd_get_xgmi_hops_count(struct kgd_dev *dst, struct kgd_dev *s
if ((mmptr) == current->mm) { \
valid = !get_user((dst), (wptr)); \
} else if (current->mm == NULL) { \
- use_mm(mmptr); \
+ kthread_use_mm(mmptr); \
valid = !get_user((dst), (wptr)); \
- unuse_mm(mmptr); \
+ kthread_unuse_mm(mmptr); \
} \
pagefault_enab...
2020 Apr 04
14
improve use_mm / unuse_mm
Hi all,
this series improves the use_mm / unuse_mm interface by better
documenting the assumptions, and my taking the set_fs manipulations
spread over the callers into the core API.
2020 Apr 04
14
improve use_mm / unuse_mm
Hi all,
this series improves the use_mm / unuse_mm interface by better
documenting the assumptions, and my taking the set_fs manipulations
spread over the callers into the core API.
2020 Apr 16
8
improve use_mm / unuse_mm v2
Hi all,
this series improves the use_mm / unuse_mm interface by better
documenting the assumptions, and my taking the set_fs manipulations
spread over the callers into the core API.
Changes since v1:
- drop a few patches
- fix a comment typo
- cover the newly merged use_mm/unuse_mm caller in vfio
2020 Apr 16
8
improve use_mm / unuse_mm v2
Hi all,
this series improves the use_mm / unuse_mm interface by better
documenting the assumptions, and my taking the set_fs manipulations
spread over the callers into the core API.
Changes since v1:
- drop a few patches
- fix a comment typo
- cover the newly merged use_mm/unuse_mm caller in vfio
2018 Nov 02
1
[PULL] vhost: cleanups and fixes
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:10 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds at linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Don't you take over the VM with "use_mm()" when you do the copies? So
> yes, it's a kernel thread, but it has a user VM, and though that
> should have the user limits.
Oooh. *Just* as I sent this, I realized that "use_mm()" doesn't update
the thread