search for: mmap_disabled

I wasted too much time today doing this, but they do show a few interesting things: 1) mmap_disable=yes is faster than mmap_disable=no. I didn't expect this. I'm not yet sure why this is, but possibly because then it updates the mail index by reading the changes from dovecot.index.log, instead of reopening and re-mmaping dovecot.index. At least that's the biggest difference between

Greetings, On http://wiki.dovecot.org/MainConfig I read: "mmap_disable = no Don't use mmap() at all. This is required if you store indexes to shared filesystems (NFS or clustered filesystem). " Does that mean: 1. mmap is required when using NFS or 2. it is required to don't use mmap at all when using NFS? Sorry if this is obvious. Best regards. -- *Marcio Merlone*

v1.1 plans have changed a bit. I'll release v1.1.alpha1 soon and hope to have a stable v1.1 in a month or two. The rest of the features that didn't make it into v1.1 will go to v1.2. I'll write more about this when v1.1 alpha is released. I also did a bit of benchmarking. v1.1's performance improvements are looking pretty great, it seems to be twice as fast as v1.0. v1.0:

Version: 1.0test53 .. 1.0.rc14 (ie. all 1.0alpha, 1.0beta and 1.0rc versions so far). 0.99.x versions are safe (they don't even have mmap_disable setting). Problem: When mmap_disable=yes setting is used, dovecot.index.cache file is read to memory using "file cache" code. It contains a "mapped pages" bitmask buffer. In some conditions when updating the buffer it allocates

Version: 1.0test53 .. 1.0.rc14 (ie. all 1.0alpha, 1.0beta and 1.0rc versions so far). 0.99.x versions are safe (they don't even have mmap_disable setting). Problem: When mmap_disable=yes setting is used, dovecot.index.cache file is read to memory using "file cache" code. It contains a "mapped pages" bitmask buffer. In some conditions when updating the buffer it allocates

Hi all, I'm experimenting with having the mail store on a 9p file system that lacks mmap() functionality. So I disabled it in dovecot: mmap_disable = yes However, I keep getting the following error messages in my log: Oct 15 16:55:00 computer-name dovecot: imap user at domain.com[192.168.1.3] Error: mmap() failed with file

Hello list, we continue our tests using Dovecot on a RHEL 6.1 Cluster Backend with GFS2, also we are using dovecot as a Director for user node persistence, everything was ok until we started stress testing the solution with imaptest, we had many deadlocks, cluster filesystems corruptions and hangs, specially in index filesystem, we have configured the backend as if they were on a NFS like setup

Hi All, I have Dovecot 1.0 Alpha3 running on x86_64 Linux 2.6 multi-CPU box using Maildir folders. Moving messages from one folder to another in Thunderbird 1.0.7, regardless of their size (usually small), produced error 83, "Out of memory", when both of these parameters were unset (default): mail_read_mmaped, mmap_disable. The log line before the error was pool_system_malloc():

Hello, I'm migrating from 1.1.16 running in 4 debian lenny servers virtualized with xenserver and 1 core and 5GB of RAM to 2.1.5 running in 4 ubuntu 12.04 servers with 6 cpu cores and 16GB of RAM virtualized with VMWare, but I'm having lots a performance problems. I don't think that virtualization platform could be the problem, because the new servers running in xenserver has

Hello, I'm deploing a new email cluster using Dovecot over GFS2. Actually I'm using courier over GFS. Actually I'm testing Dovecot with these parameters: mmap_disable = yes mail_fsync = always mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_nfs_index = yes lock_method = fcntl Are they correct? RedHat GFS support mmap, so is it better to enable it or leave it disabled? The documentation suggest the

http://dovecot.org/test/ - vpopmail authentication fix - many mmap_disable=yes fixes and a few optimizations - pop3 hang fix - mbox fix for "last-uid lost" error (hopefully last one) - mbox fix for losing dirty flag, causing lost message flags mmap_disable=yes seems to be finally working pretty well. There should be no more cache file related errors with it enabled. I'm still

Hello all, We are facing extremely slow GFS2 issues in Redhat 7 64 bit. Backend is 16 Gbps FC SAN so no issues there. I have scoured the entire (anyways most of the) Internet and arrived at the following settings. mmap_disable = yes mail_fsync = always mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_nfs_index = yes mmap_disable = yes lock_method = fcntl Did a systemctl restart dovecot and did not find any major

Hi all, I've a little pb with 1.0-stable on nfs share without lockd : with : - lock_method = dotlock - mmap_disable = yes I've : - dovecot: Jul 22 11:58:33 Error: IMAP(xxxxxxxx): open() failed with index file (null): Bad address with : - lock_method = dotlock - mmap_disable = no I've : - dovecot: Jul 22 11:59:47 Error: IMAP(xxxxxxxx): lock_method=dotlock and

http://dovecot.org/test/ - "Maildir sync: UID < next_uid (446 < 447, file = .." errors should be fixed - fixes for detecting changes in uidvalidity and external uidnext changes - several fixes and cleanups in index file handling. less code than before and now changes to index header also go through transaction log. that should mean that soon I can get mmap_disable = yes

Some new features in CVS HEAD are: - v1.0 saves most of the data to dovecot.index.cache only when the client is FETCHing the messages. With mboxes the message headers are saved while parsing the mbox, which is almost the same thing. With CVS HEAD the dovecot.index.cache file is updated already when the new messages are being saved (with deliver or IMAP APPEND). This avoids reading the message

dovecot-1.1.beta16]# gcc imaptest.c -o imaptest -g -Wall -W -I. -Isrc/lib-mail -Isrc/lib -Isrc/lib-imap -Isrc/lib-storage/index/mbox -DHAVE_CONFIG_H src/lib-storage/index/mbox/mbox-from.o src/lib-imap/libimap.a src/lib-mail/libmail.a src/lib/liblib.a imaptest.c: In client_append function: imaptest.c:1492: error: too many arguments for i_stream_create_limit function

I have two servers pointing to an NFS mounted mail spool with dovecot.? Since I recently switched from using Dovecot v1.X, I have been experiencing high CPU use with the two Dovecot servers. I am not certain why they are not well behaved.? Here is the configuration information. This configuration is currently running at a load average of 17. /usr/sbin/dovecot -n # 2.1.15:

Hello - I know I am not the only one that will be trying, or has tried this before. Here are my questions! NFS Clients, multiple servers running dovecot - linux with 2.6 kernel with relevant patches (utime, etc) Backend - netapp filer End users - various clients all running IMAP It looks like 1.0.beta8 is definately the way to go. I have a few questions with regards to setup. Is it now

Hi I have "problem" with dovect 2.2.13 from repo debian8 and I don't know how to solve it ... Server is a virtual (kvm) with debian 8.11 (postfix + dovecot from repo) and storage is mounting via nfs (I have use only one dovecot with external storage) All works fine but sometime ( after a few hours ) I have got a problem with dovecot cache (i use indexes) logs ->

How can I configure the dovecot for working with maildir's through NFS? If I add option "index_mmap_invalidate = yes" (as in doc/nfs.t) then in log I have this message: "Error: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot.conf line 296: Unknown setting: index_mmap_invalidate" If I try to get the mail without option "index_mmap_invalidate" then I have in log this