Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "mlyle".
Did you mean:
lyle
2009 Sep 07
2
[LLVMdev] 2.6 request - Bug 4879
...LAs is horribly
broken without r81058 (at least on x86-64). I don't know if it has
any other implications but it's definitely greatly stabilizing for our
code base.
Thanks,
Mike
PS -- I am not subscribed to this list.
--
Michael P. Lyle
Chief Executive Officer
Translattice, Inc.
mlyle at translattice.com
2009 Sep 08
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 request - Bug 4879
...://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090831/086443.html
into 2.6 when convenient, thanks!
-Chris
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
> PS -- I am not subscribed to this list.
>
> --
> Michael P. Lyle
> Chief Executive Officer
> Translattice, Inc.
> mlyle at translattice.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
2009 Sep 08
2
[LLVMdev] 2.6 request - Bug 4879
...te a bit
and its not causing a regression.
-Tanya
>
> -Chris
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> PS -- I am not subscribed to this list.
>>
>> --
>> Michael P. Lyle
>> Chief Executive Officer
>> Translattice, Inc.
>> mlyle at translattice.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTM...
2004 Aug 06
1
Second patch again CVS version
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:04:03AM +0100, Ricardo Galli wrote:
> Sorry, didn't explain well.
>
> Nagle's algorithm (rfc896) buffers user data until there is no pending acks
> or it can send a full segment (rfc1122).
>
> icecast doesn't need it at all, because it already sends large buffers and
> the time to send the next buffers is relatively very long.
IMO