search for: mlvm

...012 at 15:03, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>wrote: > > In the good old llvmc, the -Wo flag could be used to pass arguments to > the > > optimizer. Is there a similar mechanism anywhere for clang? Is there > also a > > similar mechanism to -Wllc? > -mlvm will handle all of them > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov > Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/...

Hi all, In the good old llvmc, the -Wo flag could be used to pass arguments to the optimizer. Is there a similar mechanism anywhere for clang? Is there also a similar mechanism to -Wllc? Thanks! Harel Cain -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120304/0e5c7267/attachment.html>

> In the good old llvmc, the -Wo flag could be used to pass arguments to the > optimizer. Is there a similar mechanism anywhere for clang? Is there also a > similar mechanism to -Wllc? -mlvm will handle all of them -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

On Saturday 28 November 2009 06:20:39 David Roberts wrote: > > How do you handle tail calls and value types? > > I haven't worried too much about optimisation yet, so it doesn't do > anything special for tail calls (although neither does the java > compiler). LLVM types are translated to their equivalent java > primitive type (or currently it raises an assertion if

> How do you handle tail calls and value types? I haven't worried too much about optimisation yet, so it doesn't do anything special for tail calls (although neither does the java compiler). LLVM types are translated to their equivalent java primitive type (or currently it raises an assertion if there is no equivalent type). -- David Roberts http://da.vidr.cc/ On Sat, Nov 28, 2009

...r me too. > > As Chris said, the LLVM world really needs any fully working solution rather > than a selection of incomplete solutions. I haven't been working on this project for too long - you can't expect it to be perfect on the first release. [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/mlvm/subprojects.html#TailCalls -- David Roberts http://da.vidr.cc/ On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 09:49, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > On Saturday 28 November 2009 06:20:39 David Roberts wrote: >> > How do you handle tail calls and value types? >> >> I haven&...