search for: mixr

...when eval() is called from within > funfails(), mc is printnormal(x = thisx, digits = 7) > and the calling environment does not contain thisx. Your functions, both funworks and funfails, did nothing wrong. They are using R as intended, so there shouldn't be anything to fix. I think that mixR::mixfitEM is making a mistake in its use of non-standard evaluation. When working with match.call(), the typical pattern is to eval() the modified call in the parent.frame() (where the call had originated and where, presumably, all its referenced variables still live). mixR cannot use this pattern...

Hi, I ran into a problem with S3 method dispatch and scoping while trying to use functions from the mixR package within my own functions. I know enough to find the problem (I think!), but not enough to fix it myself. The problem isn't really a package-specific problem, so I'm starting here, and will file an issue with the maintainer once I have a solution. Detailed explanation below, but brie...

...dioSonde is expecting. Has anyone used the Radiosonde package on the Wyoming data? Here is a sample of the Wyoming file format: 40179 Bet Dagan Observations at 00Z 22 Feb 2013 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRES HGHT TEMP DWPT RELH MIXR DRCT SKNT THTA THTE THTV hPa m C C % g/kg deg knot K K K ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 70.0 18430 -64.5 265 91 446.1 446.1 59.6 19417 -60.9...

...59.99 55.16 47.32 5 April 1987 60.81 55.85 47.69 6 May 1987 61.67 56.35 48.31 CO.Denver DC.Washington FL.Miami FL.Tampa GA.Atlanta IL.Chicago MA.Boston 1 DNXR WDXR MIXR TPXR ATXR CHXR BOXR 2 50.20 64.11 68.50 77.33 53.55 70.04 3 49.96 64.77 68.76 77.93 54.64 70.08 4 50.15 65.71 69.23 77.76 54.80 70.00 5 50.55 66...