search for: mixabl

I love the pointer analogy. Presumably the additional complication of scope breaks this however. * itself would have been a nice operator for this were it not prone to ambiguity (`a * *b` vs `a**b`, from which @ does not suffer). Would this extension require that function authors explicitly enable auto-quoting support? I somewhat envisioned functions seeing the resolved unquoted object (within

...Google, but am unaffiliated and uninvolved with this proposal), it appears clearly beneficial for LLVM to have a libc if it were done well. That said, clang shouldn’t/couldn't *require* one specific libc, just like we don’t require libc++ as the standard library. We want LLVM components to be mixable and matchable. I appreciate the comments on this thread that are throwing in ideas for how to make the project better, how to ensure it grows to being a successful and widely useful component of LLVM, etc. I for one think that this could be very useful for people building custom micro targets, a...

Greetings, I was wondering some things: For a internet radio-station (e.g. using mp3 and hopefully using ogg soon), appart from the basic 'streaming' functionallity, there are two things that are also important - mixing music - 'downgrading' a signal to a lower datarate. Concerning 'mixing' music, it would be interesting to be able to mix two ogg-files without the need to

Hi, I am running Cent OS 5.8 in production. Can someone please explain me about various repositories available in CentOS 5.8 and which third party repos ( http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories) i should use it in Production environment. Help me understand the pros and cons. Regards Kaushal

Hello LLVM Developers, Within Google, we have a growing range of needs that existing libc implementations don't quite address. This is pushing us to start working on a new libc implementation. Informal conversations with others within the LLVM community has told us that a libc in LLVM is actually a broader need, and we are increasingly consolidating our toolchains around LLVM. Hence, we

...counts here. */ - if (!ll_merge_requests_fn(q, req, next)) + if (!ll_merge_requests_fn(ctx, req, next)) return 0; /* * If failfast settings disagree or any of the two is already * a mixed merge, mark both as mixed before proceeding. This * makes sure that all involved bios have mixable attributes * set properly. */ if ((req->cmd_flags | next->cmd_flags) & REQ_MIXED_MERGE || @@ -423,59 +428,59 @@ static int attempt_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req, */ if (time_after(req->start_time, next->start_time)) req->start_time = next-&gt...

...counts here. */ - if (!ll_merge_requests_fn(q, req, next)) + if (!ll_merge_requests_fn(ctx, req, next)) return 0; /* * If failfast settings disagree or any of the two is already * a mixed merge, mark both as mixed before proceeding. This * makes sure that all involved bios have mixable attributes * set properly. */ if ((req->cmd_flags | next->cmd_flags) & REQ_MIXED_MERGE || @@ -423,59 +428,59 @@ static int attempt_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req, */ if (time_after(req->start_time, next->start_time)) req->start_time = next-&gt...