Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "missing_tag".
Did you mean:
missing_arg
2016 Apr 07
2
slowdown in notmuch perf suite with xapian 1.3.5
...8180 0/0
T02-tag.sh: Testing tagging [0.4 large]
Wall(s) Usr(s) Sys(s) Res(K) In/Out(512B)
tag * +new_tag 200.13 183.01 7.08 38628 264/1664552
tag * +existing_tag 0.00 0.00 0.00 8356 0/0
tag * -existing_tag 153.47 145.00 4.02 34928 0/1626320
tag * -missing_tag 0.00 0.00 0.00 8252 0/0
Glass
=====
T00-new.sh: Testing notmuch new [0.4 large]
Wall(s) Usr(s) Sys(s) Res(K) In/Out(512B)
Initial notmuch new 949.53 697.05 206.98 277436 1290744/21767856
notmuch new #2 2.12 0.01 0.02 8204 2552/160
notmuch new #3...
2016 Apr 08
2
slowdown in notmuch perf suite with xapian 1.3.5
Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> writes:
>
> So the T00-new.sh numbers make sense - there's more work to do, and
> we need to read existing positional data more to insert the new stuff,
> so the increased reads and writes make sense.
>
> But guessing at what the other two tests do, I wouldn't expect them to
> be affected by this.
The non-optimized-away cases of