Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "missabl".
Did you mean:
missable
2016 Nov 02
4
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library
...a couple of reasons:
1) It makes back-reference syntax ugly. "{0} {1} {0}" is much clearer to
me than "%0$ %1$ %0$". The latter syntax is also not a very well known
feature of printf and so unlikely to be used by people with a printf-style
implementation, whereas it's un-missable with the python-style syntax.
2) I don't see why we should need to specify the type of the argument with
%d if the compiler knows it's an integer. Even if the we can add
compile-time checking to make it error, it seems unnecessary to even
encounter this situation in the first place. I b...
2016 Nov 01
1
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:46 PM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Tentatively final version is up here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25587
>>
>> It has a verbal LGTM, but I plan to wait a bit