search for: misnomed

I see that the sigma() function has recently been introduced into R 3.3. The help for sigma() says: Extract the estimated standard deviation of the errors, the ?residual standard deviation? (misnomed also ?residual standard error?, e.g., in summary.lm()'s output, from a fitted model. Is there any reason not to fix the mis-naming of residual standard error now too? Both functions are in the stats package. It seems odd for one function in the package to point out an issue with another, esp...

Hi, I am trying to compile a dynamic loader using LLVM. Part of the IR for this loader looks like this: @_rtld_local = hidden alias %struct.rtld_global* @_rtld_global @_rtld_global = unnamed_addr global %struct.rtld_global { ... } The purpose of _rtld_local is to allow _rtld_global to be referenced without using the GOT, as this global is accessed before the dynamic loader initialises the GOT.

"Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > CHECK-SAME starts where the previous match ended. It is not implicitly > a DAG on the same line. Documentation patches welcome. It's unfortunate we don't have a version of CHECK-SAME that restarts the match from the beginning. Maybe I should add one. CHECK-SAME seems like a misnomer. Perhaps

...im at calvin.edu> >>>>> on Sun, 17 Apr 2016 13:54:28 +0000 writes: > I see that the sigma() function has recently been introduced into R 3.3. The help for sigma() says: > Extract the estimated standard deviation of the errors, the ?residual standard deviation? (misnomed also ?residual standard error?, e.g., in summary.lm()'s output, from a fitted model. > Is there any reason not to fix the mis-naming of residual standard error now too? Both functions are in the stats package. It seems odd for one function in the package to point out an issue with ano...

On 10/03/2013 01:22 AM, Andrew Trick wrote: > > I’m not sure how to make sense of an NUW flag coming from a sub. > > NSW is just a misnomer for signed overflow. SCEV canonicalizes sub a,b to add a, (-b). Unfortunately, signed overflow is not the same thing for sub and add... > > sub nsw %a, %b != add nsw %a, (-1 * %b) > > sub nsw i32, -1, INT_MIN is true. > > add

On 18/09/2019 13:10, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 18/09/2019 12:34, Roy Eastwood via samba wrote: > > I used the DC rejoin method as described in the WiKi to upgrade one of my DCs to version 4.11.0. Following the steps, when I came > > to rejoin the domain, it initially failed, complaining that the DC already existed, but to force the rejoin, remove the files: > >

I used the DC rejoin method as described in the WiKi to upgrade one of my DCs to version 4.11.0. Following the steps, when I came to rejoin the domain, it initially failed, complaining that the DC already existed, but to force the rejoin, remove the files: secrets.ldb and secrets.tdb. I assume you don't demote the DC before the upgrade, as there's no mention of this? Anyway, I

On Oct 1, 2013, at 6:45 AM, Michele Scandale <michele.scandale at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello to everybody, > > I'm working on some improvements on trip count computation with ScalarEvolution > analysis. > Considering the following test > > ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------; > define void @foo(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %s) #0

I understand that it is applied automatically when needed, but there are times when one would want to run it manually. An example is when I want to literally create a new wine prefix such as env WINEPREFIX="/home/bamm/apps/myprog" wineprefixcreate to prepare a clean profile for future installation of myprog. I know that running setup with a WINEPREFIX would create the clean profile,

Hello: I'd really like to leverage the samba-python API to perform 'net ads search' style queries for an upcoming project. Is there any documentation or examples someone can point me to? The 'python/examples' directory is a misnomer (!) and the online API documentation was generated from 2011 and is also just as cryptic. I even checked the binaries in samba-client to see if

Just in case my quotation causeed misunderstnaing... Forget about what I quoted before. Probably, by CBR, Monty meant ABR since CBR is stupidly patented and this is the reason why Vorbis has no CBR option. If you know this, it cannot be a problem but I see there is a question asking what is ABR in the mailing list. >On Thu 28 Jun 2001, 23:27:41 PDT, Monty (xiphmont@xiph.org)Wrote: >then

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Alan Sparks via Syslinux > <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >> I'm still trying fruitlessly to get some sort of local disk boot from >> syslinux EFI to work... using the 6.03 modules. Tried various >> combinations of configurations on Gene's test

Sorry, that name is a misnomer. However, I was excited to find that Ruby has a built in Observable module and I''m pretty bored, so I apologize in advance.... require ''observer'' # one who is observed class Celebrity include Observable attr_accessor :name attr_reader :is def is=(val) @is = val changed notify_observers(self) end end # one who

Hello to everybody, I'm working on some improvements on trip count computation with ScalarEvolution analysis. Considering the following test ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------; define void @foo(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %s) #0 { entry: %cmp = icmp sgt i32 %s, 0 %cmp15 = icmp sgt i32 %a, %b %or.cond = and i1 %cmp, %cmp15 br i1 %or.cond, label

> You can solve andersens and steengaards and everything else using > standard dataflow solvers, and that's an implementation strategy, but > it will be really slow. > > Part of the tradeoff is how fast something runs, and approaches that > are orders of magnitude faster often change the calculus of what > people do. For example, before hardekopf's work, andersens

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Vikram Adve wrote: > First, I think the name should convey the purpose of the tool -- > otherwise, it just creates a confusing acronym (and goodness knows we > have enough names already, even though most of them are clear). Yes, I totally agree. > Unfortunately this leads me to vote against llvmcs -- it's vague and > (worse) a misnomer. A

Hi, When I initially boot my system, it fails to bring up the network. Once booted, if I run "systemctl restart network.service", or even stop, wait a while, then start, it starts up fine and all is well. I'm running Fedora 19 (updated). I followed the instructions on this page to set up a bridged network: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking I note however that I did *not*

Hi Martin, On 5/26/20 06:24, Martin Maechler wrote: ... > > What about remaining back-compatible, not only to R 3.y.z with > default recycle0=FALSE, but also to R 4.0.0 with recycle0=TRUE What back-compatibility with R 4.0.0 are we talking about? The 'recycle0' arg was added **after** the R 4.0.0 release and has never been part of an official release yet. This is the time to

On 7/17/13 12:35 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > >> 3. How to parallelize post-IPO stage >> ==================================== >> >> From 5k' high, the concept is very simple, just to >> step 1).divide the merged IR into small pieces, >> step 2).and compile

On 10/03/2013 04:15 PM, Michele Scandale wrote: > On 10/03/2013 01:22 AM, Andrew Trick wrote: >> >> I’m not sure how to make sense of an NUW flag coming from a sub. >> >> NSW is just a misnomer for signed overflow. SCEV canonicalizes sub a,b to add a, (-b). Unfortunately, signed overflow is not the same thing for sub and add... >> >> sub nsw %a, %b != add nsw