search for: misnom

I see that the sigma() function has recently been introduced into R 3.3. The help for sigma() says: Extract the estimated standard deviation of the errors, the ?residual standard deviation? (misnomed also ?residual standard error?, e.g., in summary.lm()'s output, from a fitted model. Is there any reason not to fix the mis-naming of residual standard error now too? Both functions are in the stats package. It seems odd for one function in the package to point out an issue with another, e...

...e dynamic loader is used. I'm trying to figure out the best way to fix this. The GlobalValue::mayBeOverridden() function controls whether LLVM resolves aliases, and hacking this function to return true if a global is hidden gets around this particular problem, but converts the function into a misnomer (a hidden alias may _not_ be overridden, e.g. by LD_PRELOAD, although I'm pretty sure mayBeOverridden is not intended to care about LD_PRELOAD) and results in a lot of deoptimisation. I'm thinking of introducing a new function GlobalAlias::mayBeResolved() which returns true if mayBeOverr...

...s: > CHECK-SAME starts where the previous match ended. It is not implicitly > a DAG on the same line. Documentation patches welcome. It's unfortunate we don't have a version of CHECK-SAME that restarts the match from the beginning. Maybe I should add one. CHECK-SAME seems like a misnomer. Perhaps CHECK-CONTINUE would have been more clear. -David

...im at calvin.edu> >>>>> on Sun, 17 Apr 2016 13:54:28 +0000 writes: > I see that the sigma() function has recently been introduced into R 3.3. The help for sigma() says: > Extract the estimated standard deviation of the errors, the ?residual standard deviation? (misnomed also ?residual standard error?, e.g., in summary.lm()'s output, from a fitted model. > Is there any reason not to fix the mis-naming of residual standard error now too? Both functions are in the stats package. It seems odd for one function in the package to point out an issue with a...

On 10/03/2013 01:22 AM, Andrew Trick wrote: > > I’m not sure how to make sense of an NUW flag coming from a sub. > > NSW is just a misnomer for signed overflow. SCEV canonicalizes sub a,b to add a, (-b). Unfortunately, signed overflow is not the same thing for sub and add... > > sub nsw %a, %b != add nsw %a, (-1 * %b) > > sub nsw i32, -1, INT_MIN is true. > > add nsw i32, -1, (-1 * INT_MIN) is false. > > N...

...files and also smb.conf and repeated the rejoin command. This time it succeeded and > > after correcting errors with samba-tool dbcheck for the new join all looks OK. > > You cannot join something that AD still thinks is joined, that is why I > think that calling it a rejoin is a misnomer. > > You need to demote the DC, clean up the Samba directories, upgrade Samba > and then join it as a DC again. All you would retain is the hostname and IP. > > > > > Does the WikI need updating or did I miss something? > > > Yes, the wiki needs updating and no,...

I used the DC rejoin method as described in the WiKi to upgrade one of my DCs to version 4.11.0. Following the steps, when I came to rejoin the domain, it initially failed, complaining that the DC already existed, but to force the rejoin, remove the files: secrets.ldb and secrets.tdb. I assume you don't demote the DC before the upgrade, as there's no mention of this? Anyway, I

...Flags = setFlags(Flags, SCEV::FlagNUW); > if (OBO->hasNoSignedWrap()) > Flags = setFlags(Flags, SCEV::FlagNSW); > } > //-------------------------------------------------------------------------// I’m not sure how to make sense of an NUW flag coming from a sub. NSW is just a misnomer for signed overflow. SCEV canonicalizes sub a,b to add a, (-b). Unfortunately, signed overflow is not the same thing for sub and add... sub nsw %a, %b != add nsw %a, (-1 * %b) sub nsw i32, -1, INT_MIN is true. add nsw i32, -1, (-1 * INT_MIN) is false. NSW flags just aren’t an effective way to...

I understand that it is applied automatically when needed, but there are times when one would want to run it manually. An example is when I want to literally create a new wine prefix such as env WINEPREFIX="/home/bamm/apps/myprog" wineprefixcreate to prepare a clean profile for future installation of myprog. I know that running setup with a WINEPREFIX would create the clean profile,

Hello: I'd really like to leverage the samba-python API to perform 'net ads search' style queries for an upcoming project. Is there any documentation or examples someone can point me to? The 'python/examples' directory is a misnomer (!) and the online API documentation was generated from 2011 and is also just as cryptic. I even checked the binaries in samba-client to see if any existing utilities are using these Python libraries but alas, they are show up as ELFs! :-( Any pointers or insights into leveraging these module w...

Just in case my quotation causeed misunderstnaing... Forget about what I quoted before. Probably, by CBR, Monty meant ABR since CBR is stupidly patented and this is the reason why Vorbis has no CBR option. If you know this, it cannot be a problem but I see there is a question asking what is ABR in the mailing list. >On Thu 28 Jun 2001, 23:27:41 PDT, Monty (xiphmont@xiph.org)Wrote: >then

...(even just one model for now), since I believe we've seen differing behavior on different models. > So PXE is the last option? Are you manually selecting PXE from this > NIC or is the server automatically selecting this? Using VMware Workstation 10 with a VMHW v10 VM (aka vmx10 though misnomer), RHEL-6 64-bit guest OS hint, (1) e1000 NIC, forcibly changed to UEFI mode. Boot order of floppy, CD, NIC, HDD, 2 manual entries of EFI images on HDD, and the internal shell. Manually selecting NIC, booting sl604p0g18 binaries, config directive as "LOCALBOOT -1", it returns to the fi...

Sorry, that name is a misnomer. However, I was excited to find that Ruby has a built in Observable module and I''m pretty bored, so I apologize in advance.... require ''observer'' # one who is observed class Celebrity include Observable attr_accessor :name attr_reader :is def is=(val) @...

Hello to everybody, I'm working on some improvements on trip count computation with ScalarEvolution analysis. Considering the following test ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------; define void @foo(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %s) #0 { entry: %cmp = icmp sgt i32 %s, 0 %cmp15 = icmp sgt i32 %a, %b %or.cond = and i1 %cmp, %cmp15 br i1 %or.cond, label

...es, it's not superior. If your goal is > to get something into a production compiler, that is understandable, > maintainable, can turn on and off field and context sensitivity > easily, etc, then it may be a superior approach. > > Apparently "superior approach" is a misnomer on my side. My apologies. What I should have said is "an approach with superior precision". Both cfl and Ben Hardekopf's work you mentioned (which improves analysis performance by using SSA transformation as a pre-pass to eliminate easy-to-analyze pointers) can be viewed as opti...

...ould convey the purpose of the tool -- > otherwise, it just creates a confusing acronym (and goodness knows we > have enough names already, even though most of them are clear). Yes, I totally agree. > Unfortunately this leads me to vote against llvmcs -- it's vague and > (worse) a misnomer. A "system" to a program or a compiler driver or an > invoker or anything specific like that. *LLVM* is a system; this > program is a program with a more limited purpose. Of the list below, > llvmcd comes closest to describing what this tool does. I don't like llvmcs ei...

Hi, When I initially boot my system, it fails to bring up the network. Once booted, if I run "systemctl restart network.service", or even stop, wait a while, then start, it starts up fine and all is well. I'm running Fedora 19 (updated). I followed the instructions on this page to set up a bridged network: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking I note however that I did *not*

...comment that controlling the collapse operation via an argument named 'recycle0' doesn't make sense (collapse involves NO recycling). So I don't know if the current 'recyle0=TRUE' behavior is "the correct one" but at the very least the name of the argument is a misnomer and misleading. More generally speaking using the same argument to control 2 distinct operations is not good API design. A better design is to use 2 arguments. Then the 2 arguments can generally be made orthogonal (like in this case) i.e. all possible combinations are valid (4 combinations i...

...whole-program" mode is almost identical to Open64's IPA in spirit, I guess gcc community likely borrowed some idea from Open64. On the other hand, as far as I can understand of the oldish gcc's implementation before I join Apple, I guess the "whole-program mode" in gcc is misnomer. I don't want call this work as "whole-program mode", I'd like to call "big program mode" or something like that, as I don't care the binary being built see the whole-program or not while the analyses/opt do care the difference between them. > > What is a...

On 10/03/2013 04:15 PM, Michele Scandale wrote: > On 10/03/2013 01:22 AM, Andrew Trick wrote: >> >> I’m not sure how to make sense of an NUW flag coming from a sub. >> >> NSW is just a misnomer for signed overflow. SCEV canonicalizes sub a,b to add a, (-b). Unfortunately, signed overflow is not the same thing for sub and add... >> >> sub nsw %a, %b != add nsw %a, (-1 * %b) >> >> sub nsw i32, -1, INT_MIN is true. >> >> add nsw i32, -1, (-1 * INT_MIN) i...