search for: misinterprets

Using Asterisk 1.4, on the console 'show application queue' mentions an option 'i' that should "ignore call forward requests from queue members and do nothing when they are requested." Does this work? My assumption is that the member whose next according to the queue strategy should get the call even if they have forwarding enabled on their SIP device. The forwarding

Could someone help me understand if what I'm seeing with share access is correct? On my samba domain I have two users (user1 and user2) and one share; the share has attribute "writelist = user1". On a linux machine I: mount the share with "mount -t cifs -o username=user1" successfully open a file in the share for writing with the perl "open" function

FYI. Does Dovecot implement BODYSTRUCTURE? An eval copy of Mulberry can be downloaded from <http://www.cyrusoft.com/mulberry/>. ------------ Forwarded Message ------------ Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 6:56 PM +0100 From: Lennart Petersson <lennart at informatik.gu.se> To: mulberry-discuss at cyrusoft.com Subject: Dovecot and Mulberry I've recently changed my imap-server

I have auto-generated m3u's preferring port :8000 even when accessed from :80 <listen-socket> <port>8000</port> </listen-socket> <listen-socket> <port>80</port> </listen-socket> ~% w3m -dump_source http://icecast.playlouder.com:80/totalrock.m3u http://icecast.playlouder.com:8000/totalrock ~% Is this a bug or

I'm trying to use an external program to set the location of user's maildirs to match an existing hashing schema but the docs for how to do this in 1.x do not seem to apply to 2.0 or I'm misinterpreting them. protocol imap { mail_executable = /opt/dovecot-test/sonic-imap ... This correctly executes the and attempts to sets the MAIL variable but it appears that mail_executable is

Hello, I saw in the "core" commit message that you worked on the nouveau core code in userspace. I'm currently digging into some old cards support and would benefit from not having to tickle with kernel/reboot/etc. on every change/crash. Do you have any userspace code that you can share, or did I misinterpret the commit message? -- With best wishes Dmitry

Dear List, I'm trying to solve this simple optimization problem in R. The parameters are the exponents to the matrix mm. The constraints specify that each row of the parameter matrix should sum to 1 and their product to 0. I don't understand why the constraints are not satisfied at the solution. I must be misinterpreting how to specify the constrains somehow. library(alabama) ff <-

Hi, From the R Language Definition, Section 3.4.1: "If i is positive and exceeds length(x) then the corresponding selection is NA. A negative out of bounds value for i causes an error." (This is also mentioned in S Programming, footnote of page 24.) Can someone please provide an example triggering the error? Looking in src/main/subscript.c I could not find exception handling for

I'm getting a behaviour with pigeonhole that I wasn't expecting. Am I misunderstanding the design? I run my messages through a vnd.dovecot.filter. It's essentially this: filter "spam_filter"; if spamheaders { fileinto "spam"; stop; } Mail stored in the spam folder is the filtered version, but the implicit-keep message is the original, unfiltered

Hi list! I have an Asterisk server (1.2.14) connected to a E1 line via a TE410P, and some PAP2NA connected to it. The PAP2 DTMF configurations is set to INFO and Asterisk to INFO too. At first, is INFO method different from RFC2833?? Well, I have two problems. The first is that when I place a call to outside, via E1 trunk, sometimes I get some DTMF tones and I'm sure nobody hit any key. Seems

Dear R users, the way I understand the documentation of sub() and regexp the following code: sub('[[:digit:]]{1,2}', '', '9ewww') ... should yield: 'ewww' It returns, however: 'www' Why is this the case? My code should just substitute 1 (minimum) or up to 2 (maximum) digits, i.e. numbers and not the 'e' in the string. Do I misinterpret

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I am working on a port of LLVM targeting a proprietary VM. Thus far > development has been under Linux and Cygwin. Cygwin licensing would appear > to require that LLVM built under Cygwin would have to be released under the > GPL, so alternatives are being investigated. I am not a lawyer, but: I think that you are misinterpreting the

Hi, I am new around here, so I am not sure of all your procedures for submitting patches/pull requests. The attached patch fixes all Clang compilation warnings. Note, some of these warnings were real problems. There is the potential for API users to misinterpret the state being returned since the return variable was of type FLAC__StreamDecoderState, but the value being returned was

Am 04.02.2016 um 17:43 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On 04 Feb 2016, at 03:44, Thomas M?hle <thomas at bitkomplex.de> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I would like to use the users password within a mail-filter script. >> Dovecots %w variable is only available within dovecot-auth, is there any >> way to access the password for a mail-filter? > > Something

I bought a very nice little, self contained, UPS from mini-box: http://www.mini-box.com/OpenUPS2 thinking it would be handled by NUT. I think I misread or misinterpreted the HCL http://www.networkupstools.org/stable-hcl.html The OpenUPS UPS is listed as supported under usbhid-ups, and I had assumed that OpenUPS2 would be as well. Bzzzzt. I get a unknown device ID for d005 Is adding (or

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:37:18PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > as far as I can piece together, the last releases went like: > > FLAC release libOggFLAC went to > ------------- ------------------------------------------ > 1.1.0 1:2:0 from 1:1:0 (code changes only I think) > 1.1.1-beta1 2:0:1 from 1:2:0 (some i'faces added, some changed) > 1.1.1

Dear all, Trying to extract a few rows for each element of a list of data.frames, I'm puzzled by the following behaviour, > d <- lapply(1:4, function(i) data.frame(x=rnorm(5), y=rnorm(5))) > str(d) > > lapply(d, "[", i= c(1)) # fine, this extracts the first columns > lapply(d, "[", j= c(1, 3)) # doesn't do nothing ?! > > library(plyr)

Dear all, Trying to extract a few rows for each element of a list of data.frames, I'm puzzled by the following behaviour, > d <- lapply(1:4, function(i) data.frame(x=rnorm(5), y=rnorm(5))) > str(d) > > lapply(d, "[", i= c(1)) # fine, this extracts the first columns > lapply(d, "[", j= c(1, 3)) # doesn't do nothing ?! > > library(plyr)

Full_Name: John Abraham Version: rw1031 OS: Windows 2000 Professional Submission from: (NULL) (136.159.125.21) A friend introduced me to "R", and it seems just what I need -- a good statistical package with an open source flavour so that, if it doesn't do what I need it to do, I can extend it. I installed the latest windows binary, and when I try to run it I get a window

...hname somehow gets misinterpreted and split into two separates. Which in this last case, causes not existing path-/filenames. If this same pathseparation occurs in the first case, it might explain its behaviour to start working on "module/" or whatever. In short: It appears that rsync misinterprets certain pathnames, splits them up to start working on them separately. Doing so, in my case, might have caused an additional error while receiving files. Either because of the "path separation" itself or because the working on millions est. of files or it might be a completely other bug....