search for: mischaracterization

...ng time contributor to > LLVM. Many other members of the community have also expressed support for > this on this and previous threads. But our support is given as individual > members of the community and it should be valued as such. Just to add a little bit to this, it's very much a mischaracterization of the situation to imply that the code of conduct idea is some sort of demand coming from the foundation. People have been discussing the value that a code of conduct will bring to the LLVM community for as long as I've been a part of it. I'm personally very happy to see that this is fina...

> On Jun 16, 2017, at 8:23 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Peter Lawrence via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Here’s what seems to really be going on >> >> “undef” === models an uninitialized register, but > > No, it specifically does

(Sorry if you already read this in xen-devel or it''s been already posted in xen-users.) FYI, Jan Beulich has fixed the infamous "50 minute clock jump" problem, which was often mischaracterized as a TSC problem. I''ve been following the various threads for two years and archiving all the email (including the senders), so have taken it upon myself to notify those that

...t; > LLVM. Many other members of the community have also expressed support for > > this on this and previous threads. But our support is given as individual > > members of the community and it should be valued as such. > > Just to add a little bit to this, it's very much a mischaracterization > of the situation to imply that the code of conduct idea is some sort of > demand coming from the foundation. > > I can see how one would interpret Chris' statement: > > """ > Renato, I’m confused about your approach here. At this point, you seem persiste...

:) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 12:41:43 -0700 (MST) From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> To: greg@linuxpower.cx Subject: Re: [vorbis-dev] Vorbis license terms? (fwd) Would you please post something saying that this statement about my vies is drastically mistaken: Actually, RMS openly condemns any commercialization of software. He also equates

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Chris > Lattner via llvm-dev > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 4:36 PM > To: Renato Golin > Cc: llvm-dev > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM > code of conduct > > On May 5, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at

...e cold region need to be communicated back to the original function. This has a couple of implications 1. The “residue” of each extracted region is non-trivial and there is a tradeoff between the amount of code that needs to be cold before it is profitable to extract. Thus the cost of mischaracterization is high. 2. Since each SESE region is extracted separately the net reduction in code size of the original function is less. In contrast, the machine function splitter extracts cold code into a separate section. Control is transferred to cold code via jumps. More often than not these jum...

So something doesn''t look right for me when running puppet apply -e ''include ...'' for looking heria via facter fact. I have hiera configure as this, :backends: - yaml :hierarchy: - common - ''%{env_name}'' :yaml: :datadir: /var/lib/hiera/data and, a file envXX.yaml store in the datadir, and I can run *hiera xyz

+cc Simon who's also interested in reductions for the any_true, all_true predicate vectors. On 31 January 2017 at 20:19, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Amara, > > We also had some discussions on the SVE side of reductions on the main > SVE thread, but this description is much more detailed than we had > before. > > I don't

...fied in the cold region need to be communicated back to the original function. This has a couple of implications 1. The “residue” of each extracted region is non-trivial and there is a tradeoff between the amount of code that needs to be cold before it is profitable to extract. Thus the cost of mischaracterization is high. 2. Since each SESE region is extracted separately the net reduction in code size of the original function is less. In contrast, the machine function splitter extracts cold code into a separate section. Control is transferred to cold code via jumps. More often than not these jumps ma...

> Also, one of the other possible motivations of using LLD directly from Clang would be to avoid process overhead on operating systems where that is a much more significant part of the compile time cost. We could today actually take the fork out of the Clang driver because the Clang frontend *is* designed in this way. But we would also need LLD to work in this way. Then go change clang and

...iginal function. This has a couple of implications >> >> 1. >> >> The “residue” of each extracted region is non-trivial and there is a >> tradeoff between the amount of code that needs to be cold before it is >> profitable to extract. Thus the cost of mischaracterization is high. >> 2. >> >> Since each SESE region is extracted separately the net reduction in >> code size of the original function is less. >> >> >> In contrast, the machine function splitter extracts cold code into a >> separate section. Control...

I'd like to address several issues raised by people in relation to my notice of the ssh(R) trademark to the OpenSSH group. Also, I would like to make a proposal to the community for resolving this issue (included at the end). First, I'll answer a number of questions and arguments presented in the discussion. > "the SSH Corp trademark registration in the US is for a logo

Hi, I am a new user of R 2.8.1. I use Tinn-R for code editing. I use a windows 2003 system with 1 GB RAM. I am interested to generate dashboard and reports based on data from MS Access. These reports need to be posted on a weekly basis to the web. The reporting interface should provide facilities for "what if" scenarios. Is it possible to interface R analysis results to good open