Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "misassembl".
Did you mean:
misassemble
2014 Apr 01
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Section Declarations in LLVM IR
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Rafael EspĂndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think LLVM needs new IR to represent these semantics properly.
>
Cool! This proposal makes a lot of sense to me.
> > - Sections have linkage, all Values inside of a section must agree with
> the
> > section's linkage.
>
> This seems way too restrictive and I
2014 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Section Declarations in LLVM IR
...ail.com
> wrote:
> > I like this proposal. Any reason to use an explicit offset rather than
> > allow GEPs into aliases?
>
> Part of pr10367. A contant gep is more generic than whan an alias can
> actually represent I started to work on it just to find that MC would
> misassemble the generated code, which is what I have been fixing the
> last few days.
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140505/527074be/attachment.html>