search for: mis

Hola a todos Estoy cargando una base de datos a R llamada "Base", desde excel. A la hora de utilizar funciones como: >pairs(Base) Error in pairs.default(Base) : non-numeric argument to 'pairs' Una forma de arreglar este problema es utilizando la funcion as.numeric(), pero me toca hacerlo variable por variable: >Base$Variable1<-as.numeric( Base$Variable1)

...ad. It didn't seem to help. If I remove the valid users parameter it works fine. The below logfile snippet shows that it's having a problem with the group membership aspect of the valid users list. Please note that user 'mikes' is most definitely a member of the unix group 'mis': looking for user mikes of domain (ANY) in netgroup mis [2007/02/04 12:43:17, 10] passdb/lookup_sid.c:lookup_name(64) lookup_name: HCNAS\mis => HCNAS (domain), mis (name) [2007/02/04 12:43:17, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(208) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2007/02/04...

Hi, I want to impute the missing values in my data set multiple times, and then combine the results (like multiple imputation, but manually) to get a mean of the parameter(s) from the multiple imputations. Does anyone know how to do this? I have the following script: y1 <- rnorm(20,0,3) y2 <- rnorm(20,3,3) y3 <- rnor...

Hello, I am pretty new to R, I have always used SAS and SAS products. My target variable is binary ('Y' and 'N') and i have about 14 predictor variables. My goal is to compare different variable selection methods like Forward, Backward, All possible subsests. I am using misclassification rate to pick the winner method. This is what i have as of now, Reg <- glm (Graduation ~., DFtrain,family=binomial(link="logit")) step <- extractAIC(Reg, direction="forward") pred <- predict(Reg, DFtest,type="response") mis <- mean({pre...

...onnected to the NFS share. Both email servers are running CentOS 4.5 with Postfix 2.4.3, Dovecot 0.99, and authenticating via LDAP. Dovecot is using Maildir format. I've been trying to do some benchmarks using Postal and Rabid, and whenever I run rabid, I'm getting errors like this: MD5 mis-match, calculated:a628289996ce19910ebbd4eef2ebc3fc, expected 9406a7cf56afb5a1308eb5377e141719! However, when I tail the /var/log/maillog, I don't see errors - I just see the pop3-login. Just wondering if that is okay. I've also been trying to find an RPM for Dovecot 1.0.3, with no avail....

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2326 Bug ID: 2326 Summary: INFO logging fails client with mis-configured DNS Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.3p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: security Priority: P5 Component: sftp-server Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org...

...ore thing. On some architectures it might be desirable to know the _order_ of instructions in the packet. That is a bit trickier…. Isn't that just the order of the instructions in the list? I don't see anything that prevents getting the order of instructions. It might require iterator over MIs in the packet. But for targets like VLIW, the # of instructions should be small. Also note, passes that require this kind of information should aggregate and maintain the data itself. Information like schedule cycle belongs in "schedule unit", not in MI. Evan > > -- > Qualcom...

...tr: This is the most natural (meaning it looks most like the real HW bundle) representation. It has the nice property that most passes do not have to check if a MI is a bundle.The concern here this can add significant memory overhead if this means adding a ilist or SmallVector field to keep bundled MIs. 2. Add a bit to MachineInstr: The bit means the next MI in the list is part of the same bundle. This is very light weight. However it requires many passes to check wether a MI is part of a bundle. The solution is a combination of both #1 and #2. Conceptually we want a representation that look...

Evan, I will need to comprehend it better, but one small comment right away. Did we not discuss one more option for bundle implementation - global cycle ID. We would add an unsigned int field to MI definition representing "global scheduling cycle". All MIs with the same global cycle value belong to one group/packet. Zero means unscheduled MI. That is light weight, position independent (means if instructions are added/reordered by a pass that does not care for packets/groups, original grouping could be easily restored. With a single bit marking...

...//sourceforge.net/projects/outmodedbonsai/files/snpMatrix%20next/) contains codes for reading that file format, as well as two example files of such type generated from public data, and also a vignette demonstrating their usefulness and relevance to genomic studies. R svn check (the upcoming 2.14) mis-identifies those bundled files as undeclared binary executable files and aborts with that as error. (1) the files are not executables, they just happened to be mis-identified as such (2) even if they are genuine binary executables, there might be legitimate reasons to bundle them with a package?...

Peter, There was a mis-merge in the ia64 patch you put into 0.83. Olaf Hering pointed it out. The patch is attached. Olaf claims that he is still unable to compile for ia64 with is toolchain. He's getting the following error: <olh> libc.so(.got+0x0): multiple definition of `_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_' <o...

Full_Name: Hiroyuki Kawakatsu Version: 1.3.1 OS: win2k Submission from: (NULL) (130.158.140.105) the lag labels in the acf plot is screwed when the ts frequency>1. try, for example, #acf mis-feature x <- ts(rnorm(200), frequency=4); acf(x,lag.max=24); h. > version _ platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch x86 os...

...hartwellcorp.com@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Michael St. Laurent Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 9:59 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba-3.0.23 problem I've tried using the plus sign with no change. I also tried adding the machine name with no result. In other words: @mis +mis @HCNAS\mis +HCNAS\mis Have not worked. -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces+mikes=hartwellcorp.com@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+mikes=hartwellcorp.com@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Michael St. Laurent Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 9:15 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subje...

Incident Information:- Originator: "G Lalithambika"<lalithambika@mumbai.tcs.co.in> Recipients: samba@samba.org Subject: FOCHAP06 WARNING: The file FOCHAP06.DOC.pif you received was infected with the W32/SirCam@MM virus. The file attachment was not successfully cleaned.

retitle 925358 qemu-user-static: mis-emulates something to do with process/signal handling (m68k, s390x, ?) affects 925358 klibc-dev thanks This still happens. (And retitling because I almost filed a bug against klibc again? oops?) Look for ?mtest-external? (second occurrence) in: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mksh&...

...tr: This is the most natural (meaning it looks most like the real HW bundle) representation. It has the nice property that most passes do not have to check if a MI is a bundle.The concern here this can add significant memory overhead if this means adding a ilist or SmallVector field to keep bundled MIs. 2. Add a bit to MachineInstr: The bit means the next MI in the list is part of the same bundle. This is very light weight. However it requires many passes to check wether a MI is part of a bundle. The solution is a combination of both #1 and #2. Conceptually we want a representation that looks li...

...be difficult to use. All of the current backend passes will have to taught to know about bundles. The approach in the patch I sent (and I believe Timo's code works similar, according to his explanations) is precisely to make "bundles" no different from MachineInstructions. They are MIs (a class derived from it), so all other passes work transparently with them. For example, in my code register allocator does not know it is allocating regs for a bundle, it sees it just as a MI using a lot of registers. Of course, normal (scalar) passes can not "inspect" inside bundles, a...

At Mon, 19 Nov 2001 08:36:38, you wrote: > I get the labels I expect: if this is quarterly data the lags are labelled > in years. That is what `frequency = 4' is intended to mean: 4 > observations per unit of time. some further thoughts convinces me that this is a mis-feature. if you ask any person what is the lag i autocorrelation, the answer would be corr(y_t, y_{t-i}). so you would expect the lag labels to be based on observation lags, not years. if you still think the current feature is the correct implementation, i suggest that you make this clear in the he...

...stall?s : > libblas-dev liblapack-dev r-base-core tcl8.5 tk8.5 > Paquets sugg?r?s : > cdbs > Les paquets suivants seront ENLEV?S : > refblas3-dev > Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront install?s : > libblas-dev liblapack-dev tcl8.5 tk8.5 > Les paquets suivants seront mis ? jour : > r-base-core r-base-dev > 2 mis ? jour, 4 nouvellement install?s, 1 ? enlever et 19 non mis ? jour. It installed libblas-dev liblapack-dev and removed refblas3-dev. I'm now unable to run the Matrix library, whatever I install it from within R or with apt-get, it claims a pro...

...ult to use. All of the current backend passes will have to taught to know about bundles. > > The approach in the patch I sent (and I believe Timo's code works similar, according to his explanations) is precisely to make "bundles" no different from MachineInstructions. They are MIs (a class derived from it), so all other passes work transparently with them. For example, in my code register allocator does not know it is allocating regs for a bundle, it sees it just as a MI using a lot of registers. Of course, normal (scalar) passes can not "inspect" inside bundles, a...