search for: miniupnpc

...> Alice Wonder wrote: >> For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >> >> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >> >> I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is >> miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build as well. >> >> With Bitcoin 0.12.0 the ECC stuff that Red Hat ripped out of OpenSSL >> doesn't matter anymore. >> > <snip> > Thanks, but unless I need to generate some to pay ransomware, say, for a > hospital, I think...

...Now, the reason why this is not already a pull request is because bringing UPnP support to tinc is more complicated than it sounds. I could only find one UPnP library that can be qualified as "lightweight" (i.e. doesn't require ridiculous dependencies like XML libraries), that's miniupnpc: http://miniupnp.free.fr/ Here's the catch: miniupnpc only provides a blocking API, there is no way to integrate it into an event loop. That pretty much means we will need to run the UPnP code in a separate thread. Which means using pthreads on POSIX, and then we would either have a dependency...

For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build as well. With Bitcoin 0.12.0 the ECC stuff that Red Hat ripped out of OpenSSL doesn't matter anymore. -=- That spec file is somewhat based on what https://www.ringingliberty.com/bitcoin/ does for Fedora / CentOS with a couple noted differences - A) I...

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote: > miniupnpc only provides a blocking API, there is no way to > integrate it into an event loop. That pretty much means we will need > to run the UPnP code in a separate thread. Which means using pthreads > on POSIX, and then we would either have a dependency on pthreads-Win32 > on Windows, or we wo...

Currently Tinc Pre-release Windows binaries do not come with UPnP support compiled in. I'm not sure what cross-build environment tinc project currently uses to make tinc 1.1 Windows binaries but in MSYS2 it's enough to depends() on miniupnpc library and add --enable-miniupnpc to configure which seems trivial. I've been recompiling tinc with this one change for my project and UPnP seems to work very well so far on Windows nodes. Another small minor issue with the Windows package is with the bundled tap-windows install scripts. The...

...y this is not already a pull request is because > bringing UPnP support to tinc is more complicated than it sounds. I > could only find one UPnP library that can be qualified as > "lightweight" (i.e. doesn't require ridiculous dependencies like XML > libraries), that's miniupnpc: http://miniupnp.free.fr/ Here's the > catch: miniupnpc only provides a blocking API, there is no way to > integrate it into an event loop. That pretty much means we will need > to run the UPnP code in a separate thread. Which means using pthreads > on POSIX, and then we would eithe...

...d. If UPnP can be integrated by just using CreateThread() > and maybe Enter/LeaveCriticalSection(), I'd use that and avoid the whole > issue of libpthread. Okay. > NAT-PMP (and PCP?) seems interesting to, maybe it is simple enough to > code directly into tinc? Well, the author of miniupnpc also wrote libnatpmp, which apparently *is* specifically designed to be integrated into an event loop: http://miniupnp.free.fr/libnatpmp.html

[ https://www.centos.org/search.php?query=atomicorp&mid=30&action=showall&andor=AND forum search] returns a 404. Can the forum search https://www.centos.org/forums/search.php? be used with parameters that will provide the supporting material for the warning "Many CentOS users have had problems after enabling this repo"? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Alice Wonder wrote: > For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 > > https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec > > I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is > miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build as well. > > With Bitcoin 0.12.0 the ECC stuff that Red Hat ripped out of OpenSSL > doesn't matter anymore. > <snip> Thanks, but unless I need to generate some to pay ransomware, say, for a hospital, I think I'll pass. mark

...>>> For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >>> >>> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >>> >>> I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is >>> miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build as well. >>> >>> With Bitcoin 0.12.0 the ECC stuff that Red Hat ripped out of OpenSSL >>> doesn't matter anymore. >>> >> <snip> >> Thanks, but unless I need to generate some to pay ransomware, say, for a...

...For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >>> >>> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >>> >>> >>> I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is >>> miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build as well. >>> >>> With Bitcoin 0.12.0 the ECC stuff that Red Hat ripped out of OpenSSL >>> doesn't matter anymore. >>> >> <snip> >> Thanks, but unless I need to generate some to pay ransomware, say, for a...

...e should have a look > > at that. If that can be done with MiniUPnP, go ahead. > > Understood. I'll get busy this week-end :) Great :) > > NAT-PMP (and PCP?) seems interesting to, maybe it is simple enough to > > code directly into tinc? > > Well, the author of miniupnpc also wrote libnatpmp, which apparently > *is* specifically designed to be integrated into an event loop: > http://miniupnp.free.fr/libnatpmp.html Oh, nice! Hopefully it supports Windows as well. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> -...