search for: minimalistic

Hi, Is the rsync-minimalist still supported for windows? I am using Windows XP Home. I am testing, to get a solution for a client. The minimalist looked very nice--a cygwin.dll and an rsync and an ssh.exe. However, I can connect with ssh, but not with rsync over ssh using these files. I have also tried plink from putty with this rsync. I gather from a lot of the messages that the consenus is

ERROR: There is no such list DELIVERY here. SOLUTION: Send a message to minimalist@vanheusden.com with a subject of 'info' (no quotes) for a list of available mailing lists. -- Sincerely, the Minimalist

Try to use include list: --include-from=includes.txt I can ssh into rh8 machine and can rsync to machine not using includes file. When I use the include file --include-from=includes.txt + /aBackup/ - /* What I get is: receiving file list ... done wrote 50 bytes read 283 bytes 60. total size is 3021 speedup is 9.07 There are 4,396,416 bytes in the folder... Help...

I am trying to mount a share on a remote machine using a miminal smb.conf as suggested in the Samba HOWTO. Nmbd and smbd are running on the target machine. The calling machine (server?) has the name of the target (linda2) in /etc/smbshares. When I try to mount I get the error message: Got a positive name query response from 127.0.0.1 ( 192.168.0.4 ) Connecting to 192.168.0.4 at port 445

Has anybody tried to install * in any of these minimalist linux distros like tinylinux? Which linux distro would you use to run * in old P2, P3 boxes? Regards, Victor Perez vperez@mssco.com (469) 221-4189

Why does this not include? I have tried many variations including adding an exclude command. Includes.txt: + //aBackup/* + //apic/* - /* rsync --verbose --progress --stats -vv --recursive -e "ssh -p 2423" --include-from=includes.txt rsynchost: add_exclude(+ //aBackup/*.*) add_exclude(+ //apic/*) add_exclude(- /*) user@rsynchost's password: receiving file list ... add_exclude(+

Hello what is the difference between busybox and klibc? Say, I want to use an initramfs in order to mount root over nfs, I can choose to use klibc with ipconfig and nfsmount? But I can also choose to use busybox with ifconfig and mount. So what's the difference, and why and in which case one is preferable to the other? If it's a FAQ, I'm sorry, just give me the link Thanks

Hi, We have a few PC with CentOS 4 installed. By default, it runs to runlevel 5, which displays the GDM. I'm just wondering, how do I actually make the GDM to start GNOME automatically (after a successful login) for all normal user account without having to add 'exec gnome-session' in every user's ~/.xinitrc? The current scenario is, only successful 'root' logins starts

hello all - since i am such a newbie, i thought i would be the ideal person to put together a guide on how i got the opus tools working. ?i am using virtualbox and a new centOS-linux virtual-machine. i chose to use the minimalist centOS iso file so there would be no pre-installed packages. any suggestions or improvements to this guide would be most appreciated. ?? also, wish to express my

Hi, i have a proliant dl380 g5, with an amd as1000. I try to install centos8 with gui, but when try to start the new installed system, the xserver don't start. There is a throuble with the amd es1000 driver. This grafic card, seems not supported more from amd. I need a minimalistic gui for study for rhcsa certification. The gui is mandatory for the exam. Any help? Paride

Hi, I need to securely wipe out a disk on a remote machine, but I don't have access to that machine. Therefore I cannot use the LiveCD+shred (or dd) combination. Besides manually shreding known data files, I am wondering if there is a (free) tool that can be used in my case. Thanks.

Hi Rowland, Thats not the point here, if this is a AD-DC or not.. ;-) I'll explain. This is about, how DNS requests are done on the system and accepted by the "dns service" You can install unlimited DNS servers on the AD-DC and chain them, but wize.. No offcourse not. :-) Turning off systemd-resolved is probably a good idea, yes, it is. But it does not harm if its on as long

Hello, Our llvm::iterator_range is quite minimalist in design, it does not even have an "empty" method. Is that because we want it to work on all iterators (including those dirty OutputIterator)? Maybe we can add a little bit to it? I recently needed: - bool empty() - value_type& font() - value_type& back() - void advance_begin(difference_type n) - void

Hi all, I've a new CentOS 5 minimalist install; this will be the name server from my prior thread. I have configured eth0 during setup with the static IP the unit will have when in production. During this setup phase, selinux is set to permissive. Setting up on a different network, I did this: dhclient eth0 and successfully got a private address; I also validated that the resolv.conf

On Mar 23, 2006, at 1:22 AM, Reid Spencer wrote: > I dunno. You want me to actually think about this stuff? :) > > I'd have to derive the actual set of required libraries, but I'm > lacking > motivation for that task right now. OK, here's my current minimalist proposal: backend: Either a native backend or a C backend. engine: Enough libs to run ExecutionEngine

Hi all, we are just beginning to dive into rsync. I have limited experience with just playing around with the examples and reading all the docs that I can. I just read an interesting post from a developer that mentions cwrsync is a minimalistic rsync and thus things like permissions are not transfered, the post was from 2004. Here are my questions Windows (cw)Rsync Client --> Linux Rsync server 1) Should we abandon cwrsync for cygwin + rsync? Have the disparities between the two versions been resolved? 2) What are the risks wit...

On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:24 AM, Lionel Henry <lionel at rstudio.com> wrote: > On 31 janv. 2018, at 09:08, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> wrote: > > > it *actively discourages* the bits it doesn't directly support. > > It may be discouraging to include Rd syntax in roxygen docs but only > because the LaTeX-like syntax of Rd is burdensome, not because

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:58:06PM -0500, Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:17:29PM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > Fred Smith wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:25:30AM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > >> I've been googling, and looking at the CentOS wiki - which, btw, when I > > >> do a full search on

Hi, I would like to inform the community that I'm releasing the backend for tile64 I developed in the past several months. It can be downloaded from http://pnyf.inf.elte.hu/juhda/projects/tilera/ The version for LLVM 3.1 is a minimalist functioning implementation. Now I am working on utilizing the VLIW packetizer of LLVM, and other improvements are planned for the future. I would be

Hi, We are trying to compile Libvirt 1.02 from source for an RHEL4 target. Our virtualization hosts are running the fedora 17/ RHEL6 with the latest standard libvirt binaries. This is where VMs will be created. But our user/development machines are RHEL4 and we would like users to be able to use virsh/libvirt/python to control the Vms running on RHEL6/fedora17 remotely from the their RHEL4