search for: ming32

...different from say "getting started" which is more to the point. I'll try to be more concrete: "Building LLVM on Windows using the MinGW32 or MinGW64 toolchains can seem daunting at first." I never had this impression, you just checkout clang, unpack mingw, run cmake, run ming32-make. Also note that I knew next to nothing about mingw when I first did this. Mingw vs VS issues I think it would be fair to say that mingw is better supported without having to list every feature that doesn't work with VS (who will remember to change this page when the features get implemen...

Hi all, Here's an updated version of my proposed "Building with MinGW on Windows" document. In summary, the document gives a step-by-step description of how to build LLVM + Clang on Windows WITHOUT having Microsoft Visual Studio installed. The high-level goal of the document is to make life pleasant for those wonderful Windows users who desire to try out LLVM and/or Clang. I

I am trying to port the splancs library for S++ version 4.0 to R. I have modified the original FORTRAN to use dllwrap/dlltool (e.g. removed common blocks). I have been able to generate dll's (splancs.dll) using dllwrap/dlltool and Ming32 g77 with a -mdll switch. As of yet I have not been able to generate a dll that can be loaded by R. Does anyone out there have any suggestions. An example of a successful MAKEFILE or dllwrap/dlltool batch file would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.. Joseph Hughes jdhughes99 at mindspr...

...started" which is more to the point. > I'll try to be more concrete: > > "Building LLVM on Windows using the MinGW32 or MinGW64 toolchains can seem > daunting at first." > > I never had this impression, you just checkout clang, unpack mingw, > run cmake, run ming32-make. Also note that I knew next to nothing > about mingw when I first did this. > > Mingw vs VS issues > > I think it would be fair to say that mingw is better supported without > having to list every feature that doesn't work with VS (who will > remember to change this pa...

Hey Daniel, I''m trying to leave you a comment on this article you wrote: http://djberg96.livejournal.com/168403.html But since you disabled OpenID and anonyous, I''m not fond to register for another account just to reply your comments. Quoting your post: "" Unfortunately, I''ve slammed into the cold hard fact that FFI just isn''t the grand solution