Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "mindnumb".
Did you mean:
midnum
2015 Apr 22
1
alternate licensing for package data?
...where I had to do that
> the README.sources effectively becomes a forward reference to the R docs.
> But then again the ftp-masters review _thousands_ of packages and having to
> help their workflow is a small burden.
>
> In general, nitpicky licensing issue have been discussed (to mindnumbing
> length) on the debian-legal list. Those interested in the issue may want to
> peruse or search the archive:
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal
>
> Dirk
Thanks for the information, everyone! I think I'm just going to
handle it the sloppy way, provid...
2015 Apr 22
3
alternate licensing for package data?
Martyn Plummer <plummerm <at> iarc.fr> writes:
>
> I think this is covered well by the CRAN repository policy:
> http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html
>
> The two key license requirements are that:
> 1) CRAN must have a perpetual license to distribute the package
> 2) The package license should be listed here:
>
2015 Apr 22
0
alternate licensing for package data?
...iles. So for the packages where I had to do that
the README.sources effectively becomes a forward reference to the R docs.
But then again the ftp-masters review _thousands_ of packages and having to
help their workflow is a small burden.
In general, nitpicky licensing issue have been discussed (to mindnumbing
length) on the debian-legal list. Those interested in the issue may want to
peruse or search the archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
2009 Feb 18
1
asterisk-users Digest, Vol 55, Issue 52
But clients can call to your IVR and do the payment from their home or the mobile, correct?
If that is possible, how they pay $50.53? I mean, how they enter the 0.53$? They use the * to express the (.)?