search for: mincoming

...standing -fno-stack-protector -fwrapv -freg-struct-return -march=i386 -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -mregparm=3 -DREGPARM=3 -msoft-float -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-strict-aliasing -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-labels=0 -falign-loops=0 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mincoming-stack-boundary=2 -fvisibility=hidden -g -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -I./include -I../com32/include -I../com32/lib -D__SYSLINUX_CORE__ -c -o rawcon.o rawcon.c rm -f libisolinux.a ar cq libisolinux.a rawcon.o ranlib libisolinux.a cp libisolinux.a libisolinux-debug.a gcc -Wp,-MT,pla...

I'd love to get a legacy application running under wine (yeah wouldn't we all I hear ya) and I'm up to a point were it's complaining about a missing DLL as per the subject. I can get the missing file from a Windows installation but no matter where I place it (in the applications directory, in the fake_windows/Windows/System directory it doesn't find it. I have edited the

...ding -fno-stack-protector -fwrapv -freg-struct-return -march=i386 -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -mregparm=3 -DREGPARM=3 -msoft-float -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-strict-aliasing -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-labels=0 -falign-loops=0 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mincoming-stack-boundary=2 -g -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-clobbered -Werror -Wno-sign-compare -g -include code16.h -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -I. -I.. -I../libfat -I ../libinstaller -I ../libinstaller/getopt -D__MSDOS__ -c -o syslxopt.o ../libinstaller/syslxopt.c cc1: warnings being treated as...

Enviado desde mi smartphone BlackBerry Z10 4G Lte.   Mensaje original   De: admin at pr.copextel.com.cu Enviado: sábado, 7 de mayo de 2016 12:30 a.m. Para: admin at pr.copextel.com.cu Asunto: Daily mail report for 2016-05-06 Grand Totals ------------ messages 409 received 4135 delivered 0 forwarded 10 deferred (114 deferrals) 14 bounced 90 rejected (2%) 0 reject warnings 0 held 0 discarded (0%)

Hello World! (In particular, that part of it ouside the USA and Canada) I have (with official sanction of the organisation concerned) a LEGAL site for the distribution of crypt and Kerberos code. The secure code (crypt) is _identical_ to the US code. It originated in South Africa and Australia, and has never been to the US, so it is totally kosher. The Kerberos (eBones actually) code stared out

Can anyone share any advice / documentation on how to configure a Tellabs 2572 T1 echo canceller? I connected one between a T100P and an Adtran TA750 FXO/FXS channelbank, but when echo cancellation is active I get a LOT of snap-crackle-pop (and other problems) on the line. The 2572 has a bunch of configuration options and they're impossible to guess without documentation, which I cannot find

...t in it: # nm -g ./bios/core/libcom32.a | grep __bad_SEG U __bad_SEG U __bad_SEG U __bad_SEG It's as if the function wasn't compiled in :-( If I remove the .o file and relaunch make I get: gcc -Wp,-MT,kaboom.o,-MD,./.kaboom.o.d -m32 -march=i386 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mincoming-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -fno-stack-protector -fwrapv -freg-struct-return -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -mregparm=3 -DREGPARM=3 -msoft-float -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-strict-aliasing -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-labels=0 -falign-loops=0 -fvisibility=hidde...

...others: > - extlinux cleanup (4) > - EFI DNS (two different patches from two people) > - EFI UDP/TFTP rewrite > - extlinux leaks (2; some feedback already from Paulo) > $ make -j [jobs] ... gcc -MT fs/pxe/tcp.o -MD -MF fs/pxe/.tcp.o.d -m32 -march=i386 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mincoming-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -fno-stack-protector -fwrapv -freg-struct-return -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -mregparm=3 -DREGPARM=3 -msoft-float -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-strict-aliasing -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-labels=0 -falign-loops=0 -fvisibility=hidde...

...-efi submodule): gnu-efi-3.0/gnuefi/crt0-efi-ia32.o gnu-efi-3.0/lib/libefi.a After removing these and the bios, efi32 and efi64 subdirectories, the build failed ending with the following messages: [...] gcc -Wp,-MT,isohdppx_f.o,-MD,./.isohdppx_f.o.d -m32 -march=i386 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mincoming-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -fno-stack-protector -fwrapv -freg-struct-return -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -msoft-float -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-strict-aliasing -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-labels=0 -falign-loops=0 -fvisibility=hidden -g -W -Wall -Wstrict-p...

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Bruno Cornec via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Bruno Cornec via Syslinux said on Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 01:45:22AM +0100: >> >> Is there a way to increase the debug level of syslinux.efi in order to >> check what it tries to do and diagnose more precisely what happens ? > > > Ok, I tried to modify mk/devel.mk to put:

...sue which > 2-3 passes solves for me). Now this shows me something I haven't ever seen. Build continuing in the background after the main process exits? wferi at lant:~/syslinux/genec$ make [...] gcc -Wp,-MT,isohdppx_f.o,-MD,./.isohdppx_f.o.d -m32 -march=i386 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mincoming-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -fno-stack-protector -fwrapv -freg-struct-return -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -msoft-float -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-strict-aliasing -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-labels=0 -falign-loops=0 -fvisibility=hidden -g -W -Wall -Wstrict-p...

Hi, The internal Gnu-EFI build gives me grief: * efi/check-gnu-efi.sh: uses realpath, which is not available on my Debian wheezy system. I now use readlink -f, but wonder if it's needed at all. * efi/build-gnu-efi.sh: uses realpath, like above, and also pushd/popd, which is not built into a standard Bourne shell invoked by #!/bin/sh. Again I wonder what's the point of it, as

After so much time and improvements, I'm glad to see and publicize a pre-release, 6.04-pre1 in https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/Testing/6.04/ Personally, I've already been working testing the pre-release as-is and my tests have been positive so far. I appreciate feedback like that from Gabriele Balducci and testing "make bios installer". Yes, there are a

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote: > Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> writes: > >> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote: >>> >>>> * make spotless still fails after working around