search for: mimedefang

On 9/3/07, Feizhou <feizhou at graffiti.net> wrote: > > > Now, I can find some files @ /etc/mail > > > > below are files. > > > > mimedefang-filter > > sa-mimedefang.cf <http://sa-mimedefang.cf> > > sa-mimedefang.cf.example > > > > I first want to block Bcc and limit Cc to about 5 users. I googled a > > lot. But, I am still not be able to achieve this task. > > > > will I have to edit /etc...

Hah!!! This list is just too calm and mundane. The only thing we argue about is the ''announce'' list vs. the ''user'' list. ;) So, it''s springtime! I''m seeing all the regularly scheduled ''oil'' threads on my motorcycle lists and thought "oh what the heck, lets get the ''oil'' thread going over on the CentOS

On 3/31/2017 2:15 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Well, it sounds like you are one of the companies with whose effort I have > to fight constantly in my own effort to protect our users from spam... What makes Postfix superior in fighting spam? How do I integrate MIMEDefang, SpamAssassin, and ClamAV with Postfix? Are there migration guides for moving one's Sendmail anti-spam and AV configurations to Postfix? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Hi, I'm using Centos 4.4 with: mimedefang.org + spamassassin.org Mimedefang(MD) is a perl program that calls SpamAssassin(SA) perl module. The problem I'm getting is that from update 4.4, SA does not seems to find the $HOME variable only when it is called during system boot. If you later login as root and run: $ service mimedefang re...

...I try to use a variable in a require => Package construct, namely: $packagelist = ["clamav", "clamd", "clamav-db"] package { $packagelist: ensure => latest, } # Above apparently works fine... # ...THEN... file { "/etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.mimedefang": ensure => "$adminroot/mime-defang/clamd.mimedefang", require => [ File["$adminroot/mime-defang"], Package["$packagelist"], Package["mimedefang"]...

.... > > This is a good setup, but you may find that you can eliminate the second > postfix step there and go postfix -> amavisd-new -> dovecot lmtp. Unless > you need additional processing specifically from postfix after > amavisd-new, that is. I've been doing sendmail -> MIMEDefang -> SpamAssassin/clamd and then sendmail -> procmail -> SpamAssassin. Yeah, SA gets run twice, once to reject scores > 10 by the milter and then again by each user to incorporate their Bayes scores. I'd love to run it only once but haven't invested time in figuring out how to...

Hello all, About a year ago I set up a mail server on CentOS using this howto: http://wanderingbarque.com/howtos/mailserver/mailserver.html I managed to add amavisd-new with clamav and spamassassin. It runs very well, but it runs on CentOS 5.2, and if I try to upgrade, amavisd-new and clamav break. we are now also at the point where a backup mx will need to be implemented. If necessary I am

...s - existing ones > should be perfect and better than anyone else's ;) Just a heads-up, then. A regular FAQ on the SA-Talk list is how to integrate SA into someone's IMAP/POP3 server, and once Dovecot gets popular, you'll start seeing that question here. I run SA from sendmail via MIMEDefang (to reject the egregious stuff), and from procmail on delivery (to tag and quarantine the borderline stuff). I'm not sure why people would use it in the IMAP server, but the question does come up.

...3/31/2017 2:15 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Well, it sounds like you are one of the companies with whose effort I >> have >> to fight constantly in my own effort to protect our users from spam... > > What makes Postfix superior in fighting spam? > > How do I integrate MIMEDefang, SpamAssassin, and ClamAV with Postfix? > Are there migration guides for moving one's Sendmail anti-spam and AV > configurations to Postfix? > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > ________...

...nl dnl FEATURE(`mailertable')dnl FEATURE(`always_add_domain')dnl FEATURE(`use_ct_file')dnl FEATURE(`use_cw_file')dnl FEATURE(`blacklist_recipients')dnl dnl FEATURE(`relay_entire_domain')dnl dnl MAILER(local)dnl MAILER(smtp)dnl MAILER(procmail)dnl INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`mimedefang', `S=unix:/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mimedefang.sock, T=S:5m;R:5m')dnl What setup do we need for both system and virtual users ? Help would be appreciated ! thx Natan _________________________________________________________________ Reageer op foto?s van je vrienden en bekijk hun r...

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have > are lines to use the MIMEDefang and OpenDKIM milters. When last I > looked into migrating, I recall that Postfix handled milters just > fine. Milters work a little different under postfix IIRC... I haven't tried them (which is a little sad, since I think I may have been the first person to write a sendmail milter :) )....

...es it easier (for me) to administer, therefore easier (for me again) to integrate with anti-spam components (amavisd, spamassassin, clamav - the last to scan for viruses - or rather virii I should say as that is plural of latin word ;-) Just my $0.02. Valeri >> >> How do I integrate MIMEDefang, SpamAssassin, and ClamAV with Postfix? >> Are there migration guides for moving one's Sendmail anti-spam and AV >> configurations to Postfix? >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/...

I only have one Postfix server running at the moment and have some questions. On that install, I did Amavisd-new with ClamAV, SpamAssassin, Postfix and Dovecot. I know this is a bit off topic, but I'm really hoping for performance guidance. Is the added layer of complexity running Amavis worth the effort on a system with moderate mail flow? Or should I just go down the path of getting

Am 01.03.19 um 18:53 schrieb Ben Archuleta: > I need to set up a new mail server to replace an aging CentOS 6.3 mail server. I was wondering what were some of the best guides on the web for Postfix (Maildir), Spamassassin, ClamAV, Dovecot? In the list I miss a program to control clamav and spamassassin. Many people use amavis, but my experience is not very favoufable with this script. I

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > How would you implement the section here titled "Sendmail > workaround" using Postfix? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>

On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I've been doing sendmail -> MIMEDefang -> SpamAssassin/clamd and > then sendmail -> procmail -> SpamAssassin. Yeah, SA gets run twice, > once to reject scores > 10 by the milter and then again by each user > to incorporate their Bayes scores. I'd love to run it only once but > haven't invested time in...

I tried to google, but find no directions for configuring this. I would like to 1) limit greylisting only for messages that come from other countries 2) give higher spam level to these messages (preferably only for certain receiving email addresses) I already have installed geoip.x86_64 (1.4.6-1.el5.rf). How to proceed? Or should I move to CentOS 6 for this? - Jussi

Hi, I'm looking for a way, in sendmail, to set access rule, saying: Accept messages for domain.com only from this IP address. I did some research yesterday, but could only find a way to restrict by IP for all domains managed by sendmail. Any ideas? Regards, Ugo

Hi all, I am running sendmail with MailScanner on CentOS. I want to enable some restrictions. Restrictions are given below. All clients Currently can send Bcc from their workstations as usual. I want to disable (block Bcc) that feature. Can I do it from the Sendmail Server ? All clients currently can send Cc form their workstations as usual. I want to limit it. Let's say about 5 Cc s .

Hi, folks. I'm senior online editor at CIO.com, and I'm working on an article for which I'd very much like your help. There's often a lack of communication between techies and top company management. Maybe they don't want to hear about problems; perhaps you give them technical details that are far more granular than they want to know. But dealing with spam is a topic