search for: miloslav

Hi, thank you for your reply. I'll continue inline... Dne 09.09.2020 v 3:15 John Stoffel napsal(a): > Miloslav> Hello, > Miloslav> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: > Miloslav> "RAID-1 would be preferable" > Miloslav> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). > Miloslav> May I ask...

>>>>> "Miloslav" == Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> writes: Miloslav> Hi, thank you for your reply. I'll continue inline... Me too... please look for further comments. Esp about 'fio' and Netapp useage. Miloslav> Dne 09.09.2020 v 3:15 John Stoffel napsal(a): Miloslav&gt...

>>>>> "Miloslav" == Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> writes: Miloslav> Hello, Miloslav> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: Miloslav> "RAID-1 would be preferable" Miloslav> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f...

The 9361-8i does support passthrough ( JBOD mode ). Make sure you have the latest firmware. On Wednesday, 09/09/2020 at 03:55 Miloslav H?la wrote: Hi, thank you for your reply. I'll continue inline... Dne 09.09.2020 v 3:15 John Stoffel napsal(a): > Miloslav> Hello, > Miloslav> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: > Miloslav> "RAID-1 would be preferable" > Milos...

Hello, I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: "RAID-1 would be preferable" (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). May I ask you for the comments as from people around the Dovecot? We are using btrfs RAID-10 (/data, 4.7TB) on a physical Supermicro server with Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @

Dne 09.09.2020 v 17:52 John Stoffel napsal(a): > Miloslav> There is a one PCIe RAID controller in a chasis. AVAGO > Miloslav> MegaRAID SAS 9361-8i. And 16x SAS 15k drives conneced to > Miloslav> it. Because the controller does not support pass-through for > Miloslav> the drives, we use 16x RAID-0 on controller. So, we get > Milosla...

>>>>> "Miloslav" == Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> writes: Miloslav> Dne 09.09.2020 v 17:52 John Stoffel napsal(a): Miloslav> There is a one PCIe RAID controller in a chasis. AVAGO Miloslav> MegaRAID SAS 9361-8i. And 16x SAS 15k drives conneced to Miloslav> it. Because the contr...

"Miloslav" == Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> writes: Miloslav> Dne 09.09.2020 v 17:52 John Stoffel napsal(a): Miloslav> There is a one PCIe RAID controller in a chasis. AVAGO Miloslav> MegaRAID SAS 9361-8i. And 16x SAS 15k drives conneced to...

...;d get automatic backups using >>> schedule snapshots. >>> >>> Keep the index files local on disk/SSDs and put the maildirs out to >>> NFSv3 volume(s) on the Netapp(s). Should do wonders. And you'll stop >>> needing to do rsync at night. > > Miloslav> It's the option we have in minds. As you wrote, NetApp is very solid. > Miloslav> The main reason for local storage is, that IMAP server is completely > Miloslav> isolated from network. But maybe one day will use it. > > It's not completely isolated, it can rsync data...

...n local RAID. Is there some recommendation about CPU? We can choose from: - Intel Xeon E5-2620v4 - 2,1GHz at 8,0GT 20MB cache, 8core, HT, 85W, LGA2011 - Intel Xeon E5-2623v4 - 2,6GHz at 8,0GT 10MB cache, 4core, HT, 85W, LGA2011 The difference is about more cores vs. hi frequency. Thank you, Miloslav

Hi, is there any way, based on userdb/passwdb attribute, how to postpone an email delivery? The purpose is, I need to freeze an account (Maildir++) for a few minutes and new email must not be delivered. But emails must be delivered when account is unfrozen. I found few things about Postfix filters, but I'm not sure it's a good way. Thank you, Milo

...kups. Is the correct way to >> use checkpassword as a passdb before LDAP, check for account existency >> here and: > > "the correct way" is to reject messages to non-existant users by the MTA. > > Which one do you use? We are using Postfix. Thanks in advance. -- Miloslav

On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 09:47:11 +0100 Miloslav Hůla via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dne 2019-01-15 v 13:22 Miloslav Hůla via samba napsal(a): > > When I mount CIFS share (mount -t cids) with vers=1.0 I can perform > > getcifsacl sucessfully. But when I mount with vers=2.0, or 2.1, or > > 3.0, ACL readi...

Hello, we are running Dovecot (2.2.13-12~deb8u1) on Debian stable. Configured with Mailbox++, IMAP, POP3, LMTPD, Managesieved, ACL. Mailboxes are on local 1.2TB RAID, it's about 5310 accounts. We are slowly getting out of space and we are considering to move Mailboxes onto Netapp disk array with two independent network connections. Are there some pitfalls? Not sure we should use NTP or

...created for non-existent accounts too. We would like to prevent it. The LDAP binding does not supporta user lookups. Is the correct way to use checkpassword as a passdb before LDAP, check for account existency here and: result_success=continue result_failure=return-fail ? Thank you, regards, Miloslav

Hi When I mount CIFS share (mount -t cids) with vers=1.0 I can perform getcifsacl sucessfully. But when I mount with vers=2.0, or 2.1, or 3.0, ACL reading fails. getxattr error: 95 REVISION:0x0 CONTROL:0x0 Why getcifsacl depends on SMB protocol version? Can I read ACL via newer SMB protocol? A asked on Serverfault but without reply:

...psal(a): > Is there some reason why you cannot use LDAP as userdb? Those uid / gid > / home parameters can be also provided as global settings like > > mail_uid=vmail > > mail_gid=vmail > > mail_home=/data/vmail/user/%n > > Aki > > > On 29.08.2018 23:12, Miloslav H?la wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have the Dovecot (2.2.27-3+deb9u2) with LMTP and Postfix. Static >> userdb: >> >> userdb { >> ? driver = static >> ? args = uid=vmail gid=vmail home=/data/vmail/user/%n allow_all_users=yes >> } >> >> and...

...change it now anymore but in the future, always use > JBOD. > > It's also possible that you don't have the latest firmware on the > 9361-8i. If I recall correctly, they only added in the JBOD option in > the last firmware update > > On Thursday, 10/09/2020 at 08:52 Miloslav H?la wrote: > > Some controllers has direct option "pass through to OS" for a drive, > that's what I meant. I can't recall why we have chosen RAID-0 > instead of > JBOD, there was some reason, but I hope there is no difference with > single d...

Hi, we are migrating from Cyrus 2.3.7 to Dovecot 2.2.13. We have ~7000 maildirs with ~500GB. Our goal is to do the migration without users have notice and with the shortest service downtime. The users use IMAP (with shared folders and ACL), POP3 and sieve filters. As a first choice, we tried the Dovecot's dsync tool. First tests were great, but we are not able to change the Cyrus auth

* Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> 2015.04.29 22:47: > is there any way, based on userdb/passwdb attribute, how to postpone an > email delivery? The purpose is, I need to freeze an account (Maildir++) for > a few minutes and new email must not be delivered. But emails must be > de...