search for: milind

Hongbin Can you elaborate more on your suggestion? I am not sure I fully understand what you suggested. -Milind On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Hongbin Zheng <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Milind, > > Maybe you could annotate the default case value as metadata to the swith > instruction. > > Thanks > Hongbin > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Milind Chabbi &lt...

Hi Milind, My suggestion just for your concern that if you eliminate the default block, a block associated with a case value will become the default block of the swhich instruction, since a switch instruction always requires a default block. But when a block associated with a case value become the default b...

...ases such as constant propagation. When a block was part of a case, because of the knowledge of the case value, the block was a candidate for better optimization. However, when we move the body of the case into the default, the knowledge of the case value is lost and the body is less optimizable. -Milind On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:01 PM, Milind Chabbi <Milind.Chabbi at rice.edu> wrote: >> I am performing a transformation that requires changing the targets of >> a basic block ending with a switch i...

Hi Milind, Maybe you could annotate the default case value as metadata to the swith instruction. Thanks Hongbin On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Milind Chabbi <Milind.Chabbi at rice.edu>wrote: > Hi Mark, > > This will workaround the problem of "default" branch restriction on &gt...

...on. It is not clear how to accomplish this, since I don't have a replacement default target block. I could potentially fake that edge to be one of the other case label targets, but that is an ugly hack and I don't want to do that. I would appreciate if you can suggest better alternatives. -Milind

On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:01 PM, Milind Chabbi <Milind.Chabbi at rice.edu> wrote: > I am performing a transformation that requires changing the targets of > a basic block ending with a switch instruction. > In particular, I need to delete the edge that goes to the "default" > basic block. > But, LLVM switch...

Hi, I don't see the LLVM bug I filed (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16780) making any progress. Can someone suggest me whether the bug is in the correct state? -Milind On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Milind Chabbi <Milind.Chabbi at rice.edu> wrote: > Hi Hal, > > I have filed http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16780 > > -Milind > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> Milind, >> &...

Hi Hal, I have filed http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16780 -Milind On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Milind, > > Have you filed a bug on this? If not, can you please open a bug report (http://llvm.org/bugs)? > > -Hal > > ----- Original Message ----- >> I am hitting an LLVM assertion from the...

Hi all, In a conversation between me, Milind and Csaba, Milind pointed out fadvise(2) [1] and its potential benefits to Glusterfs' caching translators like read-ahead etc. After discussing about it, we agreed that our performance translators can leverage the hints to provide better performance. Now the question is how commonly application...

Thanks Milind, Yes I?m hanging out for CentOS?s Storage / Gluster SIG to release the packages for 3.12.1, I can see the packages were built a week ago but they?re still not on the repo :( -- Sam > On 18 Sep 2017, at 9:57 pm, Milind Changire <mchangir at redhat.com> wrote: > > Sam, > You mig...

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:47:47AM -0400, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > Hi all, > > In a conversation between me, Milind and Csaba, Milind pointed out > fadvise(2) [1] and its potential benefits to Glusterfs' caching > translators like read-ahead etc. After discussing about it, we agreed > that our performance translators can leverage the hints to provide > better performance. Now the question is how...

On Jul 17, 2013, at 10:09 PM, Milind Chabbi <Milind.Chabbi at rice.edu> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > This will workaround the problem of "default" branch restriction on > the switch instruction. The trouble with this technique is that it > will trump later optimization phases such as constant propagation. >...

On 08/11/2017 04:51 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:47:47AM -0400, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In a conversation between me, Milind and Csaba, Milind pointed out >> fadvise(2) [1] and its potential benefits to Glusterfs' caching >> translators like read-ahead etc. After discussing about it, we agreed >> that our performance translators can leverage the hints to provide >> better performance. Now the...

...s with the help of the SIG maintainer and I can confirm that the logs are no longer being filled with NFS or null client errors after the upgrade. -- Sam McLeod @s_mcleod https://smcleod.net > On 18 Sep 2017, at 10:14 pm, Sam McLeod <mailinglists at smcleod.net> wrote: > > Thanks Milind, > > Yes I?m hanging out for CentOS?s Storage / Gluster SIG to release the packages for 3.12.1, I can see the packages were built a week ago but they?re still not on the repo :( > > -- > Sam > > On 18 Sep 2017, at 9:57 pm, Milind Changire <mchangir at redhat.com <mailt...

Hello Admins, can i have full steps to install on centos x86_64. Thnx in advance -- Regards, Milind -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070617/dae04f8d/attachment-0001.html>

...or *if quota is turned off*. Although the file size that failed migration was 29K, I'm being a bit paranoid while weeding out issues. Are you still facing tiering errors ? I can see your response to Alex with the disk space consumption and found it a bit ambiguous w.r.t. state of affairs. -- Milind On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Herb Burnswell < herbert.burnswell at gmail.com> wrote: > Milind - Thank you for the response.. > > >> What are the high and low watermarks for the tier set at ? > > # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-hi > Option...

...ster.brick-multiplex: enable > > > -- > Sam McLeod > @s_mcleod > https://smcleod.net > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -- Milind -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170918/02d72c18/attachment.html>

Milind - Thank you for the response.. >> What are the high and low watermarks for the tier set at ? # gluster volume get <vol> cluster.watermark-hi Option Value ------ ----- cluster.watermark-hi 90 # glu...

...sters. The backtrace has resolved the function names and it *should* be sufficient to debug the issue. Thanks for letting us know. We'll post on this thread again to notify you about the findings. On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Serkan ?oban <cobanserkan at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Milind, > > Anything new about the issue? Can you able to find the problem, > anything else you need? > I will continue with two clusters each 40 servers, so I will not be > able to provide any further info for 80 servers. > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Serkan ?oban <cobanser...

...rkan ?oban" <cobanserkan at gmail.com> > Cc: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users at gluster.org> > Sent: Sunday, September 3, 2017 2:30:31 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd proccess hangs on reboot > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Milind Changire" <mchangir at redhat.com> > > To: "Serkan ?oban" <cobanserkan at gmail.com> > > Cc: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users at gluster.org> > > Sent: Saturday, September 2, 2017 11:44:40 PM > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd...