search for: mightb

On 03/02/2015 02:38 AM, Oliver Welter wrote: > Guys, dovecot is open source - if you desire a feature that the upstream > programmer did not include, pay him a bounty to do so or send him a > patch to be included. Period. We can discuss and mightbe somebody will > fork if he is not willing to accept such a solutuion for any political > reason. > > I am really tired of reading this kind of complaints on OSS lists. ....and this is perhaps the second most predictable knee-jerk response. I am certainly capable of writing such...

On 03/01/2015 04:25 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> I wonder if there is an easy way to provide dovecot a flat text >> file of ipv4 #'s which should be ignored or dropped? >> >> I have accumulated 45,000+ IPs which routinely try dictionary >> and 12345678 password attempts. The file is too big to create >> firewall drops, and I don't want to compile with

...ot is a mystery. It's > the only thing (really, the ONLY thing!) that I dislike about dovecot. > Guys, dovecot is open source - if you desire a feature that the upstream programmer did not include, pay him a bounty to do so or send him a patch to be included. Period. We can discuss and mightbe somebody will fork if he is not willing to accept such a solutuion for any political reason. I am really tired of reading this kind of complaints on OSS lists. To make this not a "troll only" posting - it might be an suitable approach to let dovecot listen on the lo interface and pu...

...2 Mar 2015, Dave McGuire wrote: > On 03/02/2015 02:38 AM, Oliver Welter wrote: >> Guys, dovecot is open source - if you desire a feature that the upstream >> programmer did not include, pay him a bounty to do so or send him a >> patch to be included. Period. We can discuss and mightbe somebody will >> fork if he is not willing to accept such a solutuion for any political >> reason. >> >> I am really tired of reading this kind of complaints on OSS lists. > > ....and this is perhaps the second most predictable knee-jerk response. > > I am cer...

...ore information would help. How exactly are out creating the output to the console? Are you using 'print', 'cat' or something else? Do you have buffered output checked on the GUI (you probably don't want it checked or you output will be delayed till the buffer is full -- this mightbe the cause of your problem. >>>> >>>> >>>> Jim Holtman >>>> Data Munger Guru >>>> >>>> What is the problem that you are trying to solve? >>>> Tell me what you want to do, not how you want to do it. >>>>...

...ut to the console? Are you using 'print', 'cat' >>>>> or something else? Do you have buffered output checked on the GUI >>>>> (you probably don't want it checked or you output will be delayed >>>>> till the buffer is full -- this mightbe the cause of your problem. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jim Holtman >>>>> Data Munger Guru >>>>> >>>>> What is the problem that you are trying to solve? >>>>> Tell me what you want to do, not how you want...