search for: microtime

hi everyone, actually i want to release an IVR system using PHPAGI API , in this IVR i want to get value from the user. I already used get_data defined in phpagi but they are not able to get the value given by the user and store it in a php variable. i tested this : $result = $agi->get_data('beep', 3000, 20); $keys = $result['result']; but every time i found in $keys variable

...use PHP to make up the table. - DB calls ARE LOCAL! Now when I try to create a table of members belonging to the same group level doing the same course with different stages of completion the DELL takes on average 3 times longer to complete the table (normally about 20 to 30 rows). I have put microtime() calls before and after certain calls, and it's visibly different: DEV Jul 04 04:57:26 UTC _members took 0.0005459785461425 ms Jul 04 04:57:26 UTC _members took 0.0005321502685546 ms LIFE Jul 04 05:00:36 UTC _members took 0.0014369487762451 ms Jul 04 05:00:36 UTC _members t...

...erent network than the local server on the same network as my > machine. > > Yet the DEV server outshines the DELL when creating a few large custom > tables, ie > the local server takes 5s while the DELL takes 15s (small tables), more > for bigger tables. > > > I have put microtime() calls before and after certain calls, and it's > visibly different: > DEV > Jul 04 04:57:26 UTC _members took 0.0005459785461425 ms > Jul 04 04:57:26 UTC _members took 0.0005321502685546 ms > LIFE > Jul 04 05:00:36 UTC _members took 0.0014369487762451 ms >...

...calls ARE LOCAL! > > Now when I try to create a table of members belonging to the same group > level > doing the same course with different stages of completion the DELL takes > on average > 3 times longer to complete the table (normally about 20 to 30 rows). > > I have put microtime() calls before and after certain calls, and it's > visibly different: > DEV > Jul 04 04:57:26 UTC _members took 0.0005459785461425 ms > Jul 04 04:57:26 UTC _members took 0.0005321502685546 ms > LIFE > Jul 04 05:00:36 UTC _members took 0.0014369487762451 ms >...

Can someone explain to me the mechanizm that Samba uses to relate Machines to Users? I am trying to set up a Samba-LDAP PDC and it seems to work OK but I get "No mapping between account names and security IDs was done." This would seem to be a simple user/group ownership/permissions thing. Now I have the following potentially pertinent ou's: People Computers Groups One

...15:10 -0000 1.72.2.14 +++ kern_fork.c 26 Sep 2003 08:26:31 -0000 @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ struct proc *p2, *pptr; uid_t uid; struct proc *newproc; - int ok; + int ok, s; static int curfail = 0, pidchecked = 0; static struct timeval lastfail; struct forklist *ep; @@ -544,10 +544,10 @@ */ microtime(&(p2->p_stats->p_start)); p2->p_acflag = AFORK; - (void) splhigh(); + s = splhigh(); p2->p_stat = SRUN; setrunqueue(p2); - (void) spl0(); + splx(s); /* * Now can be swapped.

Hello, I've got a problem with a PHP script, in which I call the system function (to call another processes). The call is : system("R --slave --vanilla < path/to/source/source.R"); if in this R file, I've got the lines: pdf(file="/path/to/file/file.pdf") commands dev.off() the pdf file is perfectly created but if I change the lines to:

Hi. I experimented a bit with collecting entropy from the time it takes for device_attach() to run (in CPU cycles). It seems that those times have enough variation that we can use it for entropy harvesting. It happens even before root is mounted, so pretty early. On the machine I'm testing it, which has minimal kernel plus NIC driver I see 75 device_attach() calls. I'm being very careful

Hello, The package for Debian woody (stable)1.0pre8 on the download site is dependent on a version of libc6 that is newer than the version of libc6 in woody (stable), which is 2.2.5-11.2. Can this be fixed so it can be installed on a standard woody system? Thanks very much! Denny Fox Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/ Tinc

Hello, I am running the staticly linked version, tinc version 1.0pre7 (built Apr 9 2002 14:00:34, protocol 14) on four Debian potato systems. The kernels are all 2.2.19. The vpn is set up as a star with one hub and three spokes. The hub and one of the legs share the same ISP and are on the same subnet. Both the other two legs are on different ISP's. All the systems are running masquerading

Hi, I have some questions about running multiple tinc deamons. The docs say you can do it to support separate VPNs, but I don't see any examples. I have been running a single tinc vpn for months with no problems, now I'm trying to add a second separate vpn. I'm running the static tinc version 1.0pre7 (built Apr 9 2002 14:00:34, protocol 14) on Debian potato. I did not want to go