search for: micrososft

...t before crash i see unresolved SID which looks like nothing I know (doesn't look like domain SID - maybe local user SID from samba member server?). All files that cause this issue are from any of the samba servers. Same files I can vew and edit "security" tab no problem on older micrososft OS (win 2012 r2 server or windows 7). I have samba 4.8.3 DC's. I didn't dig too much into it, so I can't help, other than confirm, that there is an issue with security tab under specific circumstances. W dniu 16.08.2018 o 17:22, Rowland Penny via samba pisze: > On Thu, 16 Aug 201...

Micrososft changed this statement a several of times. The only reason they did is because people using Apple are complaining some services are not working "well" on their OSX and it's a pain to change the DNS name of your Business Server on Windows Server As said before, running on .alocal for...

...ws user with a uidNumber (in which case it will be the domain SID) or it will be a local Unix user and there will not be a SID. I wonder if the 'unresolved SID' could be one of the Well Known SIDs ? > > Same files I can vew and edit "security" tab no problem on older > micrososft OS (win 2012 r2 server or windows 7). Good to know. > > I have samba 4.8.3 DC's. > > I didn't dig too much into it, so I can't help, other than confirm, > that there is an issue with security tab under specific circumstances. The thing is, without knowing what the ...

...traffic you never want go outside stays local, and that's not guaranteed with any other domainname as you can register what you want @ ICANN these days. 2015-01-05 12:43 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: > On 05/01/15 11:34, Matt . wrote: >> >> Micrososft changed this statement a several of times. >> >> The only reason they did is because people using Apple are complaining >> some services are not working "well" on their OSX and it's a pain to >> change the DNS name of your Business Server on Windows Server >...

Hi, We are running a 3 DC samba AD domain, and use 802.1x authentication for the win10 workstations to access the wired network. We are facing the issue where, following windows updates, our windows clients keep changing back the 802.1x settings to the windows default, namely: to verify the server identity and do computer authentication only. The latter is no problem, but the first one

...ng out by just using a dns domain name ending in .local ? > > Rowland > >> >> >> >> >> 2015-01-05 12:43 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: >>> >>> On 05/01/15 11:34, Matt . wrote: >>>> >>>> Micrososft changed this statement a several of times. >>>> >>>> The only reason they did is because people using Apple are complaining >>>> some services are not working "well" on their OSX and it's a pain to >>>> change the DNS name of your Busine...

...uidNumber (in which case it will be the domain SID) or it will be a > local Unix user and there will not be a SID. > I wonder if the 'unresolved SID' could be one of the Well Known SIDs ? > >> Same files I can vew and edit "security" tab no problem on older >> micrososft OS (win 2012 r2 server or windows 7). > Good to know. > >> I have samba 4.8.3 DC's. >> >> I didn't dig too much into it, so I can't help, other than confirm, >> that there is an issue with security tab under specific circumstances. > The thing is, withou...

On 05/01/15 11:34, Matt . wrote: > Micrososft changed this statement a several of times. > > The only reason they did is because people using Apple are complaining > some services are not working "well" on their OSX and it's a pain to > change the DNS name of your Business Server on Windows Server > > As said be...

...>Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: maandag 5 januari 2015 12:43 >Aan: Matt . >CC: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Don't use .local > >On 05/01/15 11:34, Matt . wrote: >> Micrososft changed this statement a several of times. >> >> The only reason they did is because people using Apple are >complaining >> some services are not working "well" on their OSX and it's a pain to >> change the DNS name of your Business Server on Windows Server...

By primary group I mean the group that is set by chgrp. that is the group returned after the pound key (#) from getfacl. In other words the Unix group and not the one managed by ACLs. / Kacper > Hello, > > I've seem to have found what looks like a bug in Samba 4.8.3. It's > the same problem as described in > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-March/214589.html.

...g .local can and will cause problems. Also, how do you stop traffic going out by just using a dns domain name ending in .local ? Rowland > > > > > 2015-01-05 12:43 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: >> On 05/01/15 11:34, Matt . wrote: >>> Micrososft changed this statement a several of times. >>> >>> The only reason they did is because people using Apple are complaining >>> some services are not working "well" on their OSX and it's a pain to >>> change the DNS name of your Business Server on Win...

...going out by just using a dns domain name ending in .local ? >> >> Rowland >> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2015-01-05 12:43 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: >>>> On 05/01/15 11:34, Matt . wrote: >>>>> Micrososft changed this statement a several of times. >>>>> >>>>> The only reason they did is because people using Apple are complaining >>>>> some services are not working "well" on their OSX and it's a pain to >>>>> change the DNS nam...

I'm not sure if I would not advise to use .local, sometimes it seems to be needed to make a proper location for a running domain where even .cityname cannot accomplish what you need. To be honest I don't run Avahi and will not either. Avahi and mdns are actually only designed because of of bad DNS management by system administrators and have (Apple) users use all their features, the same