search for: microsofty

>> We are ready to spend more than 10.000 euros to help Xen to support Windows >> 2000 >I asked a Microsoft sales guy about ports of Windows and got this quote >forwarded from the Microsoft Research guys in Cambridge >"The XenoXP work is not currently under active development. Whilst >there is no *technical* reason that it can''t be done (and it would Ok

...ws binaries and documentation whenever a new release of LLVM is made. I'm referring to the v3.0 release, which had no Windows binaries. I think that is going to change as the Windows support matures. For now, I'd like to volunteer to help out as a Windows evangelist (ouch, that sounds so Microsofty). If you need help building LLVM on Windows or help to keep the Windows documentation up-to-date, please feel free to call on me. Right now I cannot commit to so much in terms of coding, except, perhaps helping on the llvm-ar project, but I might one day be able to contribute substantial hours....

Hi, everyone: I forget on how to save a result from R as a word document. For example, if I run the linear regression and want to save the result: summary(lm(y~x) in a word file. So I can show it later to my clients. Any idea on how to do this? Thanks a lot, Suyan

OK, there may be some light at the end of the tunnel. I *can* force an arbitrary .obj file to become part of the executable, one that is not part of the executable's project. This is sufficient to eliminate the global variable hack Morten introduced for the X86 target. But this still doesn't scale very well, as I'd have to manually enumerate all .objs that are transforms and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am setting up a proof-of-concept backup server at my office. The end idea is for a dozen or so of our ~200 workstations to dump images (like PowerQuest DeployCenter, not JPEG) to a 2Tb RAID5 at reasonable speeds. The testbed (whose specs are listed below) is, I admit, grossly lacking in RAM. I still think it should handle at least two or three

Jeff Cohen wrote: > OK, there may be some light at the end of the tunnel. I *can* force > an arbitrary .obj file to become part of the executable, one that is > not part of the executable's project. This is sufficient to eliminate > the global variable hack Morten introduced for the X86 target. > > But this still doesn't scale very well, as I'd have to manually

Why are there more web design users using PHP instead of using Rails? Is there an advantage using PHP over Rails? Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

No, VC++ has no way to combine multiple .obj files into one. Nor is there any way to force the entire contents of a .lib file into an executable. Believe me, I looked for a way. Morten couldn't find one either. Even Microsoft's command line tools can't do it. Advantage: GNU. DLLs aren't that slow any more. Windows is so dependent on DLLs (the Win32 API itself is