Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "microsoft_visual_c".
2019 Feb 08
2
[cfe-dev] [PSA] minimum toolchain update completed
At Microsoft, we believe that we gain a competitive advantage by making the
Visual Studio versioning story as complicated as possible. To wit:
The compiler in the first VS 2015 release was version 19.00. For each
update/hotfix release, we bumped that version by .01. When VS 2017 was
released, we decided to keep the major compiler version the same to signify
backwards-binary-compatibility with the
2019 Sep 30
2
lld-link with MSVC6 object files
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 2:07 PM Paul Moran <bankybooks at gmail.com> wrote:
> MSVC 6 is 1998 not 1989 :)
>
Ah, I just glanced briefly at the Wikipedia article (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Visual_C%2B%2B ) & misread the "C
6.0" and didn't notice it was distinct from "Visual C++ 6.0" - thanks for
the catch!
>
> The latest MSVC linker can link these object files. Is this just because
> it has support for C13 types and some other code path for whatever MSVC...
2020 Jun 12
2
Misc patches
Sorry about that, let me check the correct version for the intrin0.h include guard.
//Marcus
________________________________
From: Ralph Giles <giles at thaumas.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 19:31
To: Marcus Asteborg <xnorpx at outlook.com>; opus at xiph.org <opus at xiph.org>
Subject: Re: [opus] Misc patches
Speaking of needing more complete ci feedback, the intrin0.h
2019 Sep 30
2
lld-link with MSVC6 object files
...m> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 2:07 PM Paul Moran <bankybooks at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> MSVC 6 is 1998 not 1989 :)
>>>
>>
>> Ah, I just glanced briefly at the Wikipedia article (
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Visual_C%2B%2B ) & misread the
>> "C 6.0" and didn't notice it was distinct from "Visual C++ 6.0" - thanks
>> for the catch!
>>
>>
>>>
>>> The latest MSVC linker can link these object files. Is this just because
>>> it has suppor...
2019 Oct 01
2
lld-link with MSVC6 object files
...at 2:07 PM Paul Moran <bankybooks at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> MSVC 6 is 1998 not 1989 :)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ah, I just glanced briefly at the Wikipedia article (
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Visual_C%2B%2B ) & misread the
>>>> "C 6.0" and didn't notice it was distinct from "Visual C++ 6.0" - thanks
>>>> for the catch!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The latest MSVC linker can link these object files....
2020 Jun 12
0
Misc patches
Verified that intrin0.h was available in 1910, by building it locally on VS2017 version 15.0
MSVC++ 14.1 _MSC_VER == 1910 (Visual Studio 2017 version 15.0)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Visual_C%2B%2B
//Marcus
________________________________
From: Marcus Asteborg <xnorpx at outlook.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 20:15
To: Ralph Giles <giles at thaumas.net>; opus at xiph.org <opus at xiph.org>
Subject: Re: [opus] Misc patches
Sorry about that, let me check the corre...
2020 Oct 02
2
[EXTERNAL] Re: preferred way to return expected values
...;
> Your sample compiles fine with it: https://godbolt.org/z/hsPneK
>
>
> Also, I've tried with "x64 msvc v19.10 (WINE)" (
> https://godbolt.org/z/vaqsPY)
>
> wiki says that v19.10 corresponds to Visual Studio 2017 version 15.0 (
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Visual_C%2B%2B),
>
> i.e. it is MSVS 2017 without updates. The sample also feels fine.
>
>
> > Looks like we would need to bump the minimum Clang up from 3.5 to at
> least 3.9 to allow returns with implicit moves that include conversions.
>
>
> Perhaps, we could have a bot to c...
2019 Oct 02
2
lld-link with MSVC6 object files
...gt;>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> MSVC 6 is 1998 not 1989 :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah, I just glanced briefly at the Wikipedia article (
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Visual_C%2B%2B ) & misread
>>>>>> the "C 6.0" and didn't notice it was distinct from "Visual C++ 6.0" -
>>>>>> thanks for the catch!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The...
2020 Oct 02
2
[EXTERNAL] Re: preferred way to return expected values
...fine with it: https://godbolt.org/z/hsPneK
>>
>>
>> Also, I've tried with "x64 msvc v19.10 (WINE)" (
>> https://godbolt.org/z/vaqsPY)
>>
>> wiki says that v19.10 corresponds to Visual Studio 2017 version 15.0 (
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Visual_C%2B%2B),
>>
>> i.e. it is MSVS 2017 without updates. The sample also feels fine.
>>
>>
>> > Looks like we would need to bump the minimum Clang up from 3.5 to at
>> least 3.9 to allow returns with implicit moves that include conversions.
>>
>>
>&g...
2020 Oct 01
2
[EXTERNAL] Re: preferred way to return expected values
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 2:08 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
> FWIW, I've performed an experiment with the code below at godbolt.
> (used -O2, https://godbolt.org/z/nY95nh)
>
> ```
> #include <vector>
> #include "llvm/Support/Error.h"
>
> llvm::Expected<std::vector<int>> foo() {
> std::vector<int> V;
>
2019 Sep 30
2
lld-link with MSVC6 object files
The CodeView library in LLVM only supports Codeview C13 types, that is, MSVC 7.0 / Visual Studio 2002 or after.
De : llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> De la part de David Blaikie via llvm-dev
Envoyé : September 30, 2019 2:38 PM
À : Paul Moran <bankybooks at gmail.com>; Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com>
Cc : llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Objet : Re: [llvm-dev] lld-link