Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "micro40_gmtis".
2009 Apr 10
1
[LLVMdev] Pass Manager Restriction?
...orrect
order, llvm will try to instantiate a new TargetData in a private pass
manager, causing an assert.
I think the notion of ``levels'' of passes is artificial, unintuitive,
and unnecessary.
--
Nick Johnson
(1) Multi-threaded Code Generation:
http://liberty.princeton.edu/Publications/micro40_gmtis.pdf
(2) Decoupled Software Pipelining:
http://liberty.princeton.edu/Publications/micro38_dswp.pdf
2009 Apr 10
0
[LLVMdev] Pass Manager Restriction?
On Apr 10, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Joseph Blomstedt wrote:
> Good to know. I was referencing a local copy of 2.3 docs which didn't
> include the "does not require any module passes" statement. It appears
> the docs were changed two days before 2.4 was released in November. I
> suppose I should update my docs more often.
>
> Are there any plans to change this
2009 Apr 10
2
[LLVMdev] Pass Manager Restriction?
Good to know. I was referencing a local copy of 2.3 docs which didn't
include the "does not require any module passes" statement. It appears
the docs were changed two days before 2.4 was released in November. I
suppose I should update my docs more often.
Are there any plans to change this restriction, or any best practices
to get similar behavior? Since immutable pass is a subclass