search for: mho

I'm testing Teliax tall free number line and I'm experiencing long delay about 1sec. during conversation. When I call myself over FWD the response is normal no delay or cut messages. When I call my number over FWD the is a long delay, welcome message usually cuts off few first words and during conversation my voice arrives after about 1sec. delay. Since, the 800-number is only accessible

...le directly. I find this much easier. In theory, we'd like to move away from the pattern-based flag inference. Once a target is free of dependence on the inference rules, it can set bit guessInstructionProperties = 0; to turn them off completely (see class InstrInfo in Target.td). > > In MHO, we should try to avoid redundancy as much as possible. The only reason to have these flags is when instructions don't have patterns. I'm fairly certain that Jakob put in an error (warning?) when tablegen detects redundant flags. Evan > We should extend the tblgen pattern lexicon t...

...ind this much easier. In theory, we'd like to move away from the pattern-based flag inference. Once a target is free of dependence on the inference rules, it can set bit guessInstructionProperties = 0; to turn them off completely (see class InstrInfo in Target.td). >>> >>> In MHO, we should try to avoid redundancy as much as possible. The only reason to have these flags is when instructions don't have patterns. >> >> I'm fairly certain that Jakob put in an error (warning?) when tablegen detects redundant flags. > > Tablegen will emit an error if...

On Jan 11, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Brooks Davis <brooks at freebsd.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:02:22AM -0500, Justin Holewinski wrote: >> That said, I think MSVC 2010 is a reasonable target. Just MHO, but I think it is far too early to drop support for MSVC 2010. > It's a bit more complex for FreeBSD (and probably the others) due to > assumptions in our build system. That's what I figured. :-( I also really don't want to inconvenience FreeBSD right when you guys have swi...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Craig Topper" <craig.topper at gmail.com> > To: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 2:29:50 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Random question about the x86 backend (and backends in general I suppose)

At 07:43 AM 6/29/2015, you wrote: >James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Mon, June 29, 2015 02:14, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > OS 6? > >> > >> Please note: I'm not criticizing, just curious about the argument > >> behind using a regular OS to do firewall-stuff. > > > > Maintenance. > > > > A consistent set of expectations does wonders for

It turns out to be pretty easy to use our random program generator to search for missed optimizations by generating highly restricted programs that are equivalent to "return 0" or similar, and then checking that LLVM properly evaporates the code. The result will be a lot of bug reports like this: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 Daniel says this is a boring phase

...tely random complex missed optimizations are less interesting to me. There is an unbounded number of things the optimizer could potentially handle, but we only have a bounded amount of engineering effort. I'd rather drive forward based on actual needs of code observed in the wild. Just MHO, -Chris

...n't so common in the past?) seems significant and my thinking would be to save those for better testing, possible RFCs, and major releases. But I'm not a developer any more and don't expect the rigor I used to apply still works in today's world. > > Lucian > <snip> MHO, in (partial) ignorance, Bill

In the context of this discussion I would appreciate any feedback the list might have on this article I wrote for my new company. http://otternetworks.de/tech/rhel-centos-brief/ I for one welcome our Redhat overlords. I think they will provide better governance which should give Centos better credibility as an Enterprise, community supported operating system. On 4 April 2015 at 17:17, Lamar

...ppears that there are two strong contenders for a Linux distribution. Ubuntu and Redhat Enterprise Linux/Centos." You seem to be overlooking Debian. Ubuntu (and many others) at some point were "clones of Debian". One can argue Ubuntu stepped up (or aside) a lot since. Still... Just MHO. Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

...and criteria, _or_ he is trolling. In either case, any response you provide will be obviously wasted as the OP's POV will likely not be affected. Therefore, you waste your time responding. Trolls, if not fed, eventually die or wander off into the distance. Please don't feed the trolls. MHO -- Bill

Anyone here use spacewalk as opposed other foss apps to accomplish the same thing? Any opinions? Thanks, jlc

I recently upgraded one of my servers to 2.5.0. Since then, I've been getting error messages like following between 2.5.0 and 2.4.6 servers. bit length overflow code 3 bits 7->6 code 10 bits 5->6 Does this error come from using different protocol version? Regards, Hori Masato Software Engineer Sony Corporation

...case, numbers, etc. Everyone that I've authorized has had to attempt multiple times to finally get in, even me, until the device in use (IPHone, Android phone, Kindle Fire, ...) remembers a successful access completion. I'm very pleased with IPCop - going on near a decade by now I guess. MHO, Bill

Just want to express MHO that the graphics produced by wmf.graph() in Splus 6 for Linux is only of barely acceptable quality (e.g., hallow circles were drawn too thick, making the plot look rather awkward). Andy -----Original Message----- From: Prof Brian D Ripley [mailto:ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk] Sent: Thursday, August...

...PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Jan 11, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Brooks Davis <brooks at freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:02:22AM -0500, Justin Holewinski wrote: > >> That said, I think MSVC 2010 is a reasonable target. > > Just MHO, but I think it is far too early to drop support for MSVC 2010. > Very much agreed! > > > It's a bit more complex for FreeBSD (and probably the others) due to > > assumptions in our build system. > > That's what I figured. :-( I also really don't want to i...

If by AMD64 you mean true 64-bit mode instruction set, I'd say it's different enough to warrant a new target. The differences between 386/486/586/etc are very minor in comparison. Reid Spencer wrote: >On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 22:40, Misha Brukman wrote: > > >>If you want to work on something, getting LLC to produce AMD64 code >>would be the first step, and getting

On May 22, 2013, at 10:41 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On May 22, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Charles Davis <cdavis5x at gmail.com> wrote: >> In particular, CMake is not distributed with Xcode. ... couldn't because he couldn't get ninja and CMake installed on his workstation. > > I'm not sure where you got the "cmake isn't included in xcode, therefore noone can use

Hi everyone, On Sunday 12 September 2004 08:03 pm, Chris Lattner wrote: > > I think that all of the major platforms should be natively supported by > lib/System. They would, through the APR. Its not a major issue to me (and I'm a nobody here anyway), but I don't understand why you would insist on this software independence *now*, when LLVM is at a very early, and still