Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "mhennemeyer".
Did you mean:
hennemeyer
2008 Jun 01
6
!= again
...speed decrease of 15% to 50%. That is still bad but having
lots of people
consider the passing of ''1.should != 1'' an rspec bug is bad too.
Here is the benchmarking script:
http://pastie.caboo.se/206853
And the code is at branch ''inspect'' in:
git://github.com/mhennemeyer/rspec
There are examples for should and should_not != and !~ and i will
definitely work on performance if you not totally reject this whole
idea.
Matthias.
2008 Mar 04
3
rspec vs. test::more
Hey all,
you HAVE to read this blog post:
http://blog.jrock.us/articles/RSpec%20vs.%20Test::More.pod#comments
My favorite parts are:
1)
... some rspec code ...
> For the sake of comparison lets translate this directly into perl:
... some perl code ...
2)
>First, notice that the rspec-version isn''t actually ruby code. It''s
not any real language.
For the sake of