search for: mgag200_bo

Several simple framebuffer drivers copy most of the TTM code from each other. The implementation is always the same; except for the name of some data structures. As recently discussed, this patch set provides generic memory-management code for simple framebuffers with dedicated video memory. It further converts the respective drivers to the generic code. The shared code is basically the same

Several simple framebuffer drivers copy most of the TTM code from each other. The implementation is always the same; except for the name of some data structures. As recently discussed, this patch set provides generic memory-management code for simple framebuffers with dedicated video memory. It further converts the respective drivers to the generic code. The shared code is basically the same

Several simple framebuffer drivers copy most of the TTM code from each other. The implementation is always the same; except for the name of some data structures. As recently discussed, this patch set provides generic memory-management code for simple framebuffers with dedicated video memory. It further converts the respective drivers to the generic code. The shared code is basically the same

Several simple framebuffer drivers copy most of the TTM code from each other. The implementation is always the same; except for the name of some data structures. As recently discussed, this patch set provides generic memory-management code for simple framebuffers with dedicated video memory. It further converts the respective drivers to the generic code. The shared code is basically the same

Several simple framebuffer drivers copy most of the TTM code from each other. The implementation is always the same; except for the name of some data structures. As recently discussed, this patch set provides generic memory-management code for simple framebuffers with dedicated video memory. It further converts the respective drivers to the generic code. The shared code is basically the same

Several simple framebuffer drivers copy most of the TTM code from each other. The implementation is always the same; except for the name of some data structures. As recently discussed, this patch set provides generic memory-management code for simple framebuffers with dedicated video memory. It further converts the respective drivers to the generic code. The shared code is basically the same

...---------------- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h index c88b6ec..04f1dfb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h @@ -237,11 +237,6 @@ mgag200_bo(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo) { return container_of(bo, struct mgag200_bo, bo); } - /* mgag200_crtc.c */ -void mga_crtc_fb_gamma_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc, u16 red, u16 green, - u16 blue, int regno); -void mga_crtc_fb_gamma_get(struct drm_crtc *crtc, u16 *red, u16 *green, - u16...

Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. Boris and Daniel, was this approximately what you had in mind? I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but the first patch is

Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 and 3 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need (when patched