search for: mfl

.... Here is my smb.conf recycle params : #vfs object = recycle #recycle:repository = ../../../recycle/%U #recycle:versions=yes #recycle:touch_mtime = true #recycle:maxsize= 40000000 #recycle:exclude= cookies.* ~$* quotas bookmarks* prefs.js.moztmp XUL.mfl lmos.dat OWNER.LOK cheers, Eric PEYREMORTE

I like this unofficial survey of hardware but wondering what MTA and spam filtering everyone is using. I do front end spam filtering for other servers as well. (junkemailfilter.com) I'm using Exim 4.61 SpamAssassin 3.11 Some version of DSpam that I'm experimenting with Most of my spam filtering happens on the Exim level. My mail spam filter server is: AMD 3800 Dual Core Athlon 2 100gb

Hi. This patchset is preparation patches for ia64/pv_ops support. They are almost trivial and mainly make kernel paravirtualization friendly. thanks, Diffstat: arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c | 1 - include/asm-ia64/intrinsics.h | 11 +++++++++++ include/asm-ia64/mmu_context.h | 6 +----- include/asm-ia64/smp.h | 2 ++ include/asm-ia64/system.h | 10 ++++++++-- 5 files

...>XP7VKS)1IZG_DR9"P!QV#>5,!A M`+''(IM0Z=9.$Q1+E4W!A-N4A,X''-DQ`7&_H%?_HF)"F3$O:R--S80]-B$0J1 MP#,U*>."AR%L[-#$^U?WK97[]LI]YTJ^?#:_]_F7''K&\AXLQ7/^]3N?N]=_K MZ/7?;3EV:\NA];^U5:W_1Z$U''GMA[C-X+3.?"VOZBW''%RF..W.N\P(NSD%C& MFL\"6C&[1Y]&''X:[^[MOW@U''!X?OAE#?9)FWF;A2SORZ$;D\;C2-?QHUCNN( MF_#5A(N^4:/5T>`P@''8?.+R&5K>+-R]?-HU:#5=EH_$5VP0NI,:-$4PX''GW8 M/SYZ]ZG9A,$`-IPFH/Y:+4A2''"1HH-DL34VH/^=0-X$W^]2:($^DC7I=_Z1! MO%!(UKAHTJ!7`HI[4PHVP+E-LG6K:.LVT78AFK@YBJG...

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

...FNWIJINpHz7Nuep6O0kvsCmrtp4M0SL+kbArQE7SJHqXt6GURNPfTPBQd9I+yHGWQSul7iOf3 6CR8v0Kb6RBlMbvyHm2hbcJvUGsbpVA+1VMLraEH2Y3KelpMZ8VvUDndSLdRD4soIeUh5RHlB/RD Oij8UrlKyZRLHSgnlfd1v1f+RCWo8W3aTWfZI0kHyI9eIvD8Lt1Oe4QlIlNWKP/ECNx0B8Yg0mw6 yYa5D6130kVmZ5uERrTytCIrx+HlpCXURXvoEJvOZnK3brEyWzlJWejjTrS6m/ppCCVGP6O3mFl3 RfmBcoVyqJhuwHwG6TU2LIxe3Tpah7jpEKWJVAnLGvof+gW9zjzsRb5GZ9aV6fy6u5Q3KYOm0AKM 9hnU/F/2Md+MskV4WWxSGigVcfmmGm36Ob3Dclkpm8MW8ol8DX9SuB15WYy6U2g5dSPej6H1M8zH hriZnxKeFp8TP9WPGz2npGJFvPQ4fZdeZCmYqcR62dfZafYub+RL+eP8vPCo+Kz4hqEds76ZVtOD 9Bx9zGysgs1lX2VdbBPbzr7JdrOT7HV2idfzVn4rvyx0CWuFn4kNKPPFXvEbunt1D+g...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking

depends on "autoconf: regenerate configure scripts with 4.4 version" This series removes some of the really old deadwood from the tools build and makes some other things which are on their way out configurable at build time with a default depending on how far down the slope I judge them to be. * nuke in tree copy of libaio * nuke obsolete tools: xsview, miniterm, lomount & sv *