search for: metrology

I'm having trouble with a simple application with metRology. I need to estimate the uncertainty of the density thickness of seven sheets of film. This is calculated from measurements of mass, length and width of rectangular samples of film. It's not too hard to calculate the whole thing with a little Monte Carlo loop. I get about 0.07 with this:...

...ersion shows the error below, which appears to be due to a lack of /src files, a problem that does not halt the *nix builds. The package contains no compiled code (src is intentionally empty). Log as follows: * installing to library 'R:/lib/R/CRAN/2.12' * installing *source* package 'metRology' ... ** libs *** arch - i386 Error in file.copy(Sys.glob("src/*"), ss, recursive = TRUE) : no files to copy from * removing 'R:/lib/R/CRAN/2.12/metRology' Run time: 1.27 seconds. Advice would be welcome on what I can do about it...? Steve Ellison **********************...

Hello, I'm trying to install the package metRology from SourceForge. I save the zip file metRology_0.9-06.tar.gz to my Windows 7 machine, and try to install the package using the RGUI: Packages > Install packages from local zip files > metRology_0.9-06.tar.gz. There's no .zip extension, but R seems to go to work on the installation wit...

SO, my full load on my core UPS is two Dell R610s, one Sun X4540, one HP DL360p gen8, two six-core Thuban-II workstations plua their monitors, and the network stack and KVM. The APC SU3000RM (3KVA) that blew up last week considered this to be just short of 60% load. The new Cyberpower PR3000 (also 3KVA), wqhich operates at a 90% power factor, considers this same load to be 43% load. I wasn't

...o 3KVA), wqhich operates at a 90% power > factor, considers this same load to be 43% load. > > I wasn't expecting that much of a reduction. So... 50% load +/- 10% :-) (The use of the term "calibration" for an UPS is slightly unfortunate - it's certainly not a traceable metrology-style calibration. I would not be surprised if most of the passives were 5-10% tolerance, and not temperature compensated.) > I have the snmp-ups driver working with it, have not enabled upsmon yet, > but upsc seems to get a rather limited set of data from it: ... > In particular, no load...

...usr/local/samba/bin/smbclient -L Israel-is Ld.so.1: /usr/local/samba/bin/smbclient: fatal: libreadline.so.4: open filed: No such file or directory Killed Please, could you explain me, what is it and what I did wrong? Thank you your answer. Kind regards Evgeni Golub System Administrator Optical Metrology Tel: 972-4-6449-406 Fax: 972-4-6449-418 Callular : 972-56-317415 Ivgeni.Golub@kla-tencor.com

hello I work on the probabilities of bivariate normal distribution. I need integrate  the following function. f (x, y) = exp [- (x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 + x * y)] with - ∞ ≤ x ≤ 7.44 and - ∞ ≤ y ≤ 1.44   , either software R or  matlab Version R 2009a Thank you for helping me Regards Mezouara hicham PhD in Metrology Hicham_dess @ yahoo.fr [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Naming policies are always tricky. The one proposed by Hadley, as the one proposed by Google, are usable but not optimal according to most common needs, that are 1. Name a package 2. Name a class 3. Name a function 4. Name a parameter of a function 5. Name a variable My approach is the following 1. Package names should be made of lowercase characters, dash, dot and underscore 2. Class names

...wer >> factor, considers this same load to be 43% load. >> >> I wasn't expecting that much of a reduction. > > So... 50% load +/- 10% :-) > > (The use of the term "calibration" for an UPS is slightly unfortunate - > it's certainly not a traceable metrology-style calibration. I would not > be surprised if most of the passives were 5-10% tolerance, and not > temperature compensated.) Oh, I know. But it should give the UPS a better idea of how long it can *actually* support that load, and for this purpose that's good enough for me. >>...

Hi Sven, Ok, before i back to my packaging, i reviewed the changes. You still missed a bit but it looks much better already, your completely there, but we will get there. And you really need to be more precise, why im telling that... Well the review. ( thats not all, im still reviewing the base only) ... https://up.tao.at/u/samba/graz-file.info2.txt Checking file: