search for: methodized

Hi, I am new to clustering and was wondering why pvclust using "maximum" as distance measure nearly always results in p-values above 95%. I wrote an example programme which demonstrates this effect. I uploaded a PDF showing the results Here is the code which produces the PDF file: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- s <-

A general goal for the next version of R is to make S4 and S3 play better together. As mentioned in a previous thread, one limitation has been that S3 generic functions, specifically the UseMethod() call, did not make use of S4 inheritance when dispatching on general S4 objects. This has been fixed in a version committed today (updated to rev 52267). The code change is not large, but it

Methods in OCaml which don't take any parameters don't require the dummy unit arg, ie writing: method foo = ... is fine. The reason you might need the unit arg is if you need to create a closure from the method without calling it, for example if you need to use the method in a callback. In lablgtk2 the convention is to use unitless methods if either: the method shouldn't be used

I've just installed CentOS 4.2 on a brand-new PC. It appears to be working fine except for one thing: When the system is first powered on, the boot sequence hangs after Starting udev: Initializing hardware ... storage network audio If I then hit the reset button, it reboots and successfully proceeds. Looking at rc.sysinit and the output of kmodule, it would appear that the problem is

Bugs item #7549, was opened at 2007-01-03 05:19 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=218&aid=7549&group_id=35 Category: None Group: current Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Nobody (None) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: missing ''methods'' section in some class documentation Initial Comment: The

All, I am attempting to do some custom validation on my object. Here is my validate method: protected def validate puts "Do I have the target_list_ids method? " + self.methods.include?(''target_list_ids'').to_s if target_list_ids.nil? || target_list_ids.length == 0 errors.add_to_base("You must choose at least one target list for this job")

Description of what I am trying to do: I am using the xyplot code below to plot the variable ?MeanBxg? against the variable ?PercentVarExplained? for all 9 possible combinations of variables ?bdg? and ?bdx?. Within each of these 9 scenarios I am plotting a separate line for each of up to 9 different methods that I used to estimate the variable MeanBxg. These methods are identified by the numeric

Dear all, I'm trying to understand the S4 way of object-oriented programming, but I still can't grasp completely what R is doing. I have a class definition for a class called PM10Meteo, and I set a initializer function. next, I include a show method and a print method as shown below. setClass( Class="PM10Meteo",...) # end setClass setMethod

I define the following function: (Please don't wonder about the use of this function, this is just a simplified version of my actual function. And please don't spend your time in finding an alternate way of doing the same as the following does not exactly represent my function. I am only interested in a good explanation) > f1 =

In commit c306fa93ab and neighbors (v1.15.1), a concerted effort went into caching the results of .can_FOO callbacks, with commit messages demonstrating that a plugin with a slow callback should not have that delay magnified multiple times. But nothing was added to the testsuite at the time, and with the sh and eval plugins, we still have two scenarios where we did not take advantage of the

Dear list, just to make sure that I understand 'unregistering' methods for S4 reference classes correctly: If I registered a method and want to 'unregister' (i.e. remove) this method again, objects/instance created of the respective class still feature the removed method until I do an explicit reassign ('my.instance <- getRefClass("Classname")$new()'), right?

Esteemed R UseRs, Regarding specifying arguments in functions and calling functions within functions: ## beginning ## ## some data ex <- rnorm(10) ex[5] <- NA ## example function Scale <- function(x, method=c("mean", "median")) { scl <- method scl(x) } ## both return NA Scale(ex, method=median) median(ex, na.rm=FALSE) ## both return the median Scale(ex,

(a new thread, on purpose) >>>>> "RobG" == Robert Gentleman <rgentlem at fhcrc.org> >>>>> on Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:55:50 -0700 writes: RobG> Hi, I just committed a change to R-devel so that if RobG> debug is called on an S3 generic function, all methods RobG> will also automatically have debug turned on for them RobG>

Hello. I have a UsersController and a Model called User with a "new" method, like this: class User < ActiveRecord::Base def test return 1 #I can do anything and return any data, the problem continues. end end The problem is that I cannot access my "test" function from the controller. It says that the method doesn''t exists. class

Hi, I have an array with objects and I want to generate an XML like: <objects> <object> <category_id>1</category_id> <helper-method>result 1</helper-method> </object> <object> <category_id>2</category_id> <helper-method>result 2</helper-method> </object> </objects> The helper

Hello, In an effort to help LLVM-style projects save memory, I’ve been toying with some macros that provide an alternative to C++ vtables that use LLVM-style RTTI design patterns instead. Is this something that LLVM or sub-projects think is worth pursuing? Or are the macros below too ugly/problematic? Feedback would be appreciated. Thanks, Dave //===- llvm/Support/VTable.h - LLVM-style

Helo all, Yesterday dovecot began droping connections and there is nothing conclusive in the log file, just the messagens below: Sep 2 11:43:57 relay01 dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected: Inactivity: method=PLAIN, rip=200.152.100.77, lip=10.0.3.1 Sep 2 11:44:02 relay01 dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected: Inactivity: method=PLAIN, rip=200.204.69.20, lip=10.0.3.1 Sep 2 11:44:19 relay01 dovecot:

I have a template that belongs to a certain model (model A). I need to call a helper method of a different model (model B). Then I need the helper method of B to call a helper method of model C. I tried using "include" and "require" and using namespaces, but I got "undefined method". What is the way to do it? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, we have some questions concerning the definition of new arithmetic methods. In our package "distr" (on CRAN) we define some new arithmetic methods for "+", "-", "*", "/". After loading "distr" the corresponding arithmetic methods work. Now, if we define a new class and also a new method for one of the arithmetic methods

I''m having trouble with my routing, and was wondering if anyone else had seen something similar. I''ve got these two routes: map.login ''/login'', :controller => ''sessions'', :action => ''new'', :requirements => { :method => :get } map.connect ''/login'', :controller => ''sessions'',