search for: meteorologicas

Dear list users, let me ask you this trivial question. I worked on that for a long time, by now. Suppose to have a data frame with NAs and to sum some columns with rowSums: df <- data.frame(A = runif(10), B = runif(10), C = rnorm(10)) df[1, ] <- NA rowSums(df[ , which(names(df) %in% c("A","B"))], na.rm=T) If all the elements of the selected columns are NA, rowSums

Buen día para todos. Tengo un pequeño problema en el quisiera que me colaboraran. Estos días estoy trabajando en la lectura de una gran cantidad de archivos de extención .csv, se trata de una lista de documentos de 11 estaciones meteorologicas. Cada estación esta clasificada por meses y cada mes por dias, asi que tengo un archivo cada día. Por ejemplo tengo un archivo .csv para el día uno del mes de enero, otro archivo para el día dos del mes de enero, otro para el día tres del mes de enero y así sucesivamente hasta completar todos los m...

On 21/03/2018 11:44 AM, Stefano Sofia wrote: > Dear list users, > let me ask you this trivial question. I worked on that for a long time, by now. > Suppose to have a data frame with NAs and to sum some columns with rowSums: > > df <- data.frame(A = runif(10), B = runif(10), C = rnorm(10)) > df[1, ] <- NA > rowSums(df[ , which(names(df) %in%

Dear R users, I need to produce rainfall maps using R. I know that this is possible, I looked though the web, I found the example below reported (the author is Andrew Tredennick). I would ask you if this is the most performing way to make rainfall maps; if yes would someone be able to give me an example of how file.asc and pointfile.csv should be? If no would somebody please show me another way

What do you mean by "should not"? NULL means "missing object" in R. The result of the sum function is always expected to be numeric... so NA_real or NA_integer could make sense as possible return values. But you cannot compute on NULL so no, that doesn't work. See the note under the "Value" section of ?sum as to why zero is returned when all inputs are removed.

Should not the result be NULL if you have removed the NA with na.rm=TRUE ? B. > On Mar 21, 2018, at 11:44 AM, Stefano Sofia <stefano.sofia at regione.marche.it> wrote: > > Dear list users, > let me ask you this trivial question. I worked on that for a long time, by now. > Suppose to have a data frame with NAs and to sum some columns with rowSums: > > df <-

Hi, You might get more help from the R-sig-geo list, which is devoted to spatial topics. However. The *.asc file is an ArcGIS raster export format. You should use whatever the appropriate import commands are for your own gridded rainfall data. If you have a different format, you might or might not be able to import it directly with raster. ?raster will tell you more about the kinds of formats

Fwiw the engine behind geom_raster needs explicit observation-per-row form for input (with no structural normalization), so conversion to points is perfectly proper here, albeit confusing in context. (It's closer to what graphics devices actually use ultimately, but the expansion is laid out very early in ggplot2 because there's no standard for intermediate forms.) Cheers, Mike On Wed,

No. The empty sum is zero. Adding it to another sum should not change it. Nothing audacious about that. This is consistent; other definitions just cause trouble. -pd > On 21 Mar 2018, at 18:05 , Boris Steipe <boris.steipe at utoronto.ca> wrote: > > Surely the result of summation of non-existent values is not defined, is it not? And since the NA values have been _removed_,

Surely the result of summation of non-existent values is not defined, is it not? And since the NA values have been _removed_, there's nothing left to sum over. In fact, pretending the the result in that case is zero would appear audacious, no? Cheers, Boris > On Mar 21, 2018, at 12:58 PM, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: > > What do you mean by

...es] Leer archivos con read.csv > > Buen día para todos. > > Tengo un pequeño problema en el quisiera que me colaboraran. > > Estos días estoy trabajando en la lectura de una gran cantidad de archivos > de extención .csv, se trata de una lista de documentos de 11 estaciones > meteorologicas. Cada estación esta clasificada por meses y cada mes por > dias, asi que tengo un archivo cada día. Por ejemplo tengo un archivo .csv > para el día uno del mes de enero, otro archivo para el día dos del mes de > enero, otro para el día tres del mes de enero y así sucesivamente hasta > c...

Thank you Sarah and Mike for your explanations. My final objective is to produce maps (png image or any kind of extension I can import in LaTeX) where rainfall data are interpolated, using the Inverse Distance method or Kriging. My input file (pointfile.csv in the reported example) reports the station code, lat and long of the meteorological station and the rainfall value (which might be the

I see: consistency with additive identity. That makes sense. Thanks. B. > On Mar 21, 2018, at 1:22 PM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > No. The empty sum is zero. Adding it to another sum should not change it. Nothing audacious about that. This is consistent; other definitions just cause trouble. > > -pd > >> On 21 Mar 2018, at 18:05 , Boris

"I see: consistency with additive identity. " Ummm, well: > 1+NULL numeric(0) > sum(1,NULL) [1] 1 Of course, there could well be something here I don't get, but that doesn't look very consistent to me. However, as I said privately, so long as the corner case behavior is documented, which it is, I don't care. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with