search for: metasystema

> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:16 -0600, Richard Laager wrote: > > I see you've added a Reply-To header later. The canonical response in > > this case is for someone to reference: > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > Yes, I've read that page. It says basically that it makes replying > privately to the sender difficult. I'm sure it does, but

I just added 802.1Q VLAN support to redhat initscripts. And after support was ready, I tried to restart shorewall. Well it blew into pieces. Seems like shorewall can''t handle device names like: eth0.3 very properly. That''s default naming of vlan devices. eth1 is master device and 3 is id of my test vlan. So when I added to interfaces line: home eth0.3 detect seems like

Any know what Digium hasn't released the DS3 card? It was supposed to be out a while ago. -Matt